True Dope's best move now. . . "We will drop all charges, lift all banking restrictions. . . and never mention this again. Deal?"
A reminder on how Harper handled the G20 protest in Toronto
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
Unfortunately though, he’s gotten away with too much for too long that I seriously doubt he’s capable of what you’re proposing, and even with a minority gov’t, he’ll have Jagmeet case the peanuts he throws around the room in exchange for political favours, but every time Jagmeet does this his odds of being anything but Justin’s Lackey get slimmer & slimmer, & that is pretty sad as I really expected more from Jagmeet Singh.
Naturally. . . in True Dope's time as PM, when have you ever seen him make the smart move?
The only reason he's still there is because the Tories put up even weaker candidates. To be honest, it staggers me that Canada, a country that slugs way above its weight, seems unable to produce a single smart, modest, intelligent candidate. I'm sorry, I don't mean this as an insult, but rather as commiseration. But this is coming from a citizen of a country that, in two consecutive elections, has managed to elect the crazy fat kid and a superannuated senator well past his sell-by date. When I'M feeling sorry for you, you got a problem.
Why would you have ? He has been consistent throughout .
Yikes Biden , Trump , Obama , look in the mirror , 350,000,000 of you .
Since you didn’t, I went looking for confirmation of your claim as it seemed too far fetched. Anyway, I got your link for you:
CCLA Reaction to the Revocation of the Declaration of Emergency - CCLA
We welcome the government’s decision to revoke the proclamation of emergency – it is overdue.From the outset, however, we have stated that the government did not meet the legal thresholds set out in the Emergencies Act.
ccla.org
Here’s what the CCLA says about your claim:
We welcome the government’s decision to revoke the proclamation of emergency – it is overdue.
From the outset, however, we have stated that the government did not meet the legal thresholds set out in the Emergencies Act.
We continue to believe that there was an insufficient legal basis for resort to the Emergencies Act and that the orders the government passed under this legislation were unconstitutional.
We also continue to believe that it is important for the courts to consider the legal threshold and constitutional issues so as to guide the actions of future governments.
Even though the orders are no longer in force, Canadians are left with the precedent that the government’s actions have set.
We will be consulting with our counsel over the next few days to determine what the next steps are in our litigation, but at this time we will continue our case.
CityNews
Legal action against use of Emergencies Act 'under consideration' by Sask. government
The Government of Saskatchewan is considering taking legal action against the federal government for its use of the Emergencies Act.
The above is from Wednesday 23rd, & today is Saturday 26th. You’re saying the CCLA is dropping their suit, then asking where’s the lawsuit? Seriously dude, pick a lane.
The CCLA states, 3 day ago, being there most recent release of information, “We will be consulting with our counsel over the next few days to determine what the next steps are in our litigation, but at this time we will continue our case.”
What do you think they’re stating?
CCLA Reaction to the Revocation of the Declaration of Emergency - CCLA
We welcome the government’s decision to revoke the proclamation of emergency – it is overdue.From the outset, however, we have stated that the government did not meet the legal thresholds set out in the Emergencies Act.
ccla.org
The above is from Wednesday 23rd, & today is Saturday 26th. You’re saying the CCLA is dropping their suit, then asking where’s the lawsuit? Seriously dude, pick a lane.
The CCLA states, 3 day ago, being there most recent release of information, “We will be consulting with our counsel over the next few days to determine what the next steps are in our litigation, but at this time we will continue our case.”
What do you think they’re stating?
CCLA Reaction to the Revocation of the Declaration of Emergency - CCLA
We welcome the government’s decision to revoke the proclamation of emergency – it is overdue.From the outset, however, we have stated that the government did not meet the legal thresholds set out in the Emergencies Act.
There's no statement of claim.
Wake me up when there is one.
Rather than giving you the punch that comment just begs for, I'll just say "Son, it hurts ME to see you leave yourself that open!"
I think we're both aware of the context so if others want to punch, then punch away.
Someone's gotta stand up for freeze peach in here.
Call it ignorance and indifference, but I do not know and do not care what you're pissing and moaning about.
Thanks.
From the outside looking in , I can’t see how no war , energy independence, Muddled East peace agreements and full employment are such terrible accomplishments. But that is just me . Of course spending his presidency fighting off trumped up charges in the media didn’t help , but who is to blame for that ?
