A man is a rape supporter if
- Thread starter CUBert
- Start date
Two thoughts.
1. You seem to be hung up on the conscious consent issue, while the article posted here was written before that ruling came out. It's not about that ruling. It's all about how men are just pure evil and support rape just by breathing.
2. If you are going to get serious about the hypothetical you just posed, saying that you want to do something, doesn't give someone else consent to do it, so it's a moot point all around. If I say I want to cut my hair, it doesn't mean you can cut my hair for me.
My apologies to all and yes CUBert that in particular means you for the post I made that was removed and the last post as well.
Again, my apologies.
In the scenario you present it is murder for consent was not given.
Consent must be explicit and cannot be taken as valid when the person uttering the words is under the influence of drugs, alcohol, shock and/or other extremes of stress for one is not in their right mind during those times.
What you suggest is still murder in Canada even if consent is given with clarity as euthanasia is illegal here.
People say things they do not mean all the time so be very cautious on what you consider to be consent.
As a woman should you hear me say, "I want to have sex." This WOULD NOT BE CONSENT.
Why? Because I did not say, "I want to have sex with you." It was vocal thought - not an invitation.
Being a man-hating feminist who thinks nearly any act a man commits is akin to supporting rape is politically correct?
I think the reactions of a forum full of people have proven it's very much not. so far I haven't heard one person agree with her.
Your the one that attacked first m8. If you think I need help just cause I have big healthy ballz where's the respect in that? If your body produces less testosterone, maybe your just not cut out to be alpha male, The world can use plenty of runts. This is where in Real natural life we would proceed to a fight to the death, to settle it once and for all.
More then ever.
USA act's exactly like the alpha male of the world. Tribal instincts still is very much alive in todays globalized world, Don't fool yourself. Just the fact we still have Country's is a direct indication of our tribal past. Our law's are a attempt at domestication of the human race. Its a mass population control tool.
Just cause we live in a self domesticated country today doesn't mean that millions of years of evolution and survival is going to just vanish without a trace. we still remain animals with everything that go's along with that, even if we teach our kids to act in a certain way, with religion, code's of conduct, and law's. Police is still mostly Alpha males enforcing the rule.
Thats why most men in this society have to control them self everyday or often depending on there situation. Its no fun, but we still do it. My Pointe is, Women should appreciate that, Not spit on it.
Yes
I appriciate women looking at me as equals, unlike this lady that wrote the original, subject of the tread.
I control myself. why is she looking down at me for being what I am. a Male.
So you control these inner emotions that as you stated you have a high level of the Male hormone - they all should appreciate that you do not throw them down on the floor and go at it.You stated you have really high levels of the male hormone as you stated to another member. No not that member, the other one.
So how do you control these urges?
By simply not doing it.
My question is.
If that women doesn't look at me as equal why should I?
Thoughout 60 years upon this planet I have have had cause to speak with, associate or cope with men of many races, cultures, ethnicities, ideologies, ages, classes, education, judgments, and habits.
I left home just before turning 17 in 1967 and must report that the average man, in my experience, is a person in control of his urges, intelligent, thoughtful, strong, of good character and polite.
I was raped as a teen hitch-hiking across the USA and had a few try it in Canada too during the 1070s. I did not hold on to the experience and allow it to colour my life. In fact, I grew to admire men and their accomplishments. Why hold onto a bad experience?
I would not want to live in a world without men.
Only a small percentage of men are rapists. Good grief! There are 7 billion plus people on the planet. If all men were slaves to their testosterone and acting out their primitive urges upon women and children without thought we would not even exist!!!
The human race would have expired in its infancy.
To generalize men as active or potential rapists is to define women as manipulative, greedy, destructive, shallow, weak and of low intelligence. Unfortunately, too many women do display these unpleasant characteristics today - but - most do not.
I left home just before turning 17 in 1967 and must report that the average man, in my experience, is a person in control of his urges, intelligent, thoughtful, strong, of good character and polite.
I was raped as a teen hitch-hiking across the USA and had a few try it in Canada too during the 1070s. I did not hold on to the experience and allow it to colour my life. In fact, I grew to admire men and their accomplishments. Why hold onto a bad experience?
I would not want to live in a world without men.
Only a small percentage of men are rapists. Good grief! There are 7 billion plus people on the planet. If all men were slaves to their testosterone and acting out their primitive urges upon women and children without thought we would not even exist!!!
The human race would have expired in its infancy.
To generalize men as active or potential rapists is to define women as manipulative, greedy, destructive, shallow, weak and of low intelligence. Unfortunately, too many women do display these unpleasant characteristics today - but - most do not.
Last edited:
The problem with radical feminism, with radical anything, is that it deals with absolutes only. It is full on black vs white with absolutely no shades of grey. Individual human beings are all about our shades of grey, that's what makes us individuals. People are more than the sum of their parts, whether that "part" is their genitalia or the predominant hormone in their body.
The author of this piece asserts, from what I can gather in her blog, that her target audience is others in the radical feminist community. So how does that make it any different than a neo-nazi group or al-queda group propagating their own views amongst each other? Now, please understand, I am not equating the different groups here. I'm merely pointing out what I see as a similarity in the primary purpose of the material. This list does absolutely nothing to address rape as a violent crime, to work on changing attitudes within society regarding rape, or to either help victims of rape or identify perpetrators of rape. Instead all it does is assign absolute blame on an entire gender.
It is not about the individual points , some of which may have some merit, many of which do not, nor about the collective point being made. Even in the comments, the author dismisses the substitution of "A woman is a rape supporter if". So the purpose of this list is merely propogating the idealist agenda of the author. Hey she's entitled to her views, we all are. But again it does nothing to address the actual issue of rape.
Rape is an act of violence, sex is merely the weapon. It is 100% completely different and separate from any kind of sexual activity. If there is a misconception in society of what rape truly is, which I do believe there is, then assigning blame does nothing to change that.
The author of this piece asserts, from what I can gather in her blog, that her target audience is others in the radical feminist community. So how does that make it any different than a neo-nazi group or al-queda group propagating their own views amongst each other? Now, please understand, I am not equating the different groups here. I'm merely pointing out what I see as a similarity in the primary purpose of the material. This list does absolutely nothing to address rape as a violent crime, to work on changing attitudes within society regarding rape, or to either help victims of rape or identify perpetrators of rape. Instead all it does is assign absolute blame on an entire gender.
It is not about the individual points , some of which may have some merit, many of which do not, nor about the collective point being made. Even in the comments, the author dismisses the substitution of "A woman is a rape supporter if". So the purpose of this list is merely propogating the idealist agenda of the author. Hey she's entitled to her views, we all are. But again it does nothing to address the actual issue of rape.
Rape is an act of violence, sex is merely the weapon. It is 100% completely different and separate from any kind of sexual activity. If there is a misconception in society of what rape truly is, which I do believe there is, then assigning blame does nothing to change that.
Really now?
What is your definition of "Pushed too Far?"
Where is the line when someone would be pushed far enough to resort to that specific action?
I regards to the term "Kill" does that mean "Murder" "Suicide" "Assisted Suicide" or "Self Defence" or all of the above, or none of the above & select "Other"??
Pushed too far, and Kill, are a bit generalized in explanation.
I agree, it makes about as much sense as claiming we're all sinners the moment we're born, ala RC Church & the Gang.
When the right wing darling Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska she supported a law that forced women rape victims to pay for their own rape kits. I guess that shows there are certain women who are rape supporters as well.