Every kilogram was accouned for. It's all there on the ground Smack every bit that didn't burn and blow away.
Funny how you prove my point!
But can you see a plane? No...It had to be a missle and a conspiracy.
Every kilogram was accouned for. It's all there on the ground Smack every bit that didn't burn and blow away.
Funny how you prove my point!
But can you see a plane? No...It had to be a missle and a conspiracy.
Unless cars can fly they won't be tossed about. Ever see videos of planes landing directly over beaches...not a person is disturbed.
Apparently you lost because you've resorted to silly unreason again.
Funny thing about airplanes. In flight, they to push air out of the way. Should they bump into the ground at anything other recommended practice, they tend to distort ... but the original mass is still there. It's something like a bullet fired into a Marine's ass: can't see the projectile so is the goldbricker lying about it?
Once you've seen enough of those hollywood disaster flics with all the special effects,real life disasters seem too dull to be believed. Just my thoughts on some of the 9/11 doubters:smile:
Would government employees lie? Where is da videos?
At what speed does your official story say this plane was flying?
The United plane video has the car directly behind it. That is why I said if cars could fly they would have been tossed. Mind you this thing was flying.
Were these government employees?
Where is the video of the supposed Iranian C-130 crash? It must be a missle then. In fact I would go so far as to say that every crash that isn't on video is a missle and the ones that they do catch on video are clearly faked or holograms.
Smack, if it's so ****ing obvious that a plane hit the pentagon why do you suppose most of the planet can't see it and dosn't believe any of the official report. Why not just do the right thing and surrender to reason and common sence. I'm sorry but there simply was no aircraft Smack and there is nothing really that you can do to change that old sport.
Yes ... this thing was flying - which means you would have wingtip vorticies compressing with the ground (ground effect) forcing the fuselege to lift. That, in short, is why it is physically impossible for a high lift wing to maintain straight and level flight at high speed at less than half its wingspan above the ground.
Also, thrust from those engines spreads in a conical shape. If the plane approached on a descending flight path, it it possible. Your official story maintains the final mile of flight was straight and level at an altitude low enough to shear the lights of standards thirty feet high - and only recently did the official story change so that it wasn't an inexperienced pilot on the helm. Fly by wire could not have been over-ridden by a flight school washout so your pilot would have to be expert in his field.
I was on an aircraft carrier...you are correct about the conical shape jet blast. However you have to be directly behind it to get hit with the full force.
Figure out the mass of that aircraft because that is the mass of the compressive wave and multiply it by the speed of that aircraft and you will have computed the hit those light standards and any vehicle on that road took ... and it only trimmed tops off poles? No crushed cars? No cars tossed behind by about 70 thousand pounds of thrust from two jet engines running at full tilt?
No cars tossed behind by about 70 thousand pounds of thrust from two jet engines running at full tilt?
I'm pretty sure that whole compressive wave thingy has been incontrovertibly refuted. I'm no physicist but it seems to me if one can stand in a hurricane....