9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked - Video

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
How many years ago was that? The CT never caught on, remote hijacking is the current theory. Seems to me there are more than a few family members of 911 that would like a more in-depth investigation (rather than take the cash settlement in which they would drop the demand for any further investigation) The Gov should be supporting that investigation instead of making one impossible. So you might have given up double-checking all the 'events' but not all of your countrymen have taken that route. Sent these one the last line in your post, I'm sure they would love to have your input..
.

Your version of events please?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I meant that things changed in a big way, regardless of whether or not it was an
inside job. Proving whether or not it was an inside job doesn't change the fact that
it happened, & our altered perceptions of safety after it happened.

What happened? A snapshot of the post event results is not a snapshot of the event itself. So all we know is the immediate visable results of an undefined event and not the precipitating event itself. That's key to prevention of repeat events, which is and has been stressed ad nauseum, despite the cheap slack contrived investigation afforded the matter. The inventors and practitioners of game theory should be on the case like flies. "Altered perceptions" was the desired and expected result notwithstanding the clients, in that way the event was a stunning if barbaric success. Who advances over the chequerd board?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
All those conspiracy theorists.........I think their time would be better spent athttp://www.redtube.coadd an (m) if you are over 21:lol:

Many people are concerned about the welfare of conspiracy theorists, this is not disputed, however the numbers of people concerned with those people who don't think about things (the dead) is very low as we might expect, their time cannot possibly be better spent. :lol:
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Are you sure you have the right country? Iraq was the false-flag WMD story. (which nobody remembers) I think you are overestimating the number it would take and the influence threat of death can have on some people who need more incentive than just raw power.
Case in point, painting some key joints, would take a crew of 20 a few weeks, ie Blackwater types.
So? That's just one thing. Then there is planning the whole thing and making sure that no-one leaked or at least that no-one leaked anything believable, rigging the planes to be controlled from a distance, conning the military into not having anything nearby that might shoot down the planes, and so on and so on. If this all happened according to the conspiracies, it took a few more than one crew of 20 people. Just screening these people to be the right sort of people that would do as you wished without spilling the beans would take a while. And you'd be bound to have a few people that you screened that actually wouldn't pass the screening. How would you keep them clammed up about the screening even let alone what they were being screened for?
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Sending Pete and Repete on a mission of any importance is a task even Vegas won't comment on. lol
Hey, we have a whole pile of people we can conspire with to do it. Maybe even the military and cops, oh thou of limited scope.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
So? That's just one thing. Then there is planning the whole thing and making sure that no-one leaked or at least that no-one leaked anything believable, rigging the planes to be controlled from a distance, conning the military into not having anything nearby that might shoot down the planes, and so on and so on. If this all happened according to the conspiracies, it took a few more than one crew of 20 people. Just screening these people to be the right sort of people that would do as you wished without spilling the beans would take a while. And you'd be bound to have a few people that you screened that actually wouldn't pass the screening. How would you keep them clammed up about the screening even let alone what they were being screened for?
Why do you even entertain her delusions? Painting thermite on key joints?

She has got to be kidding.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Many people are concerned about the welfare of conspiracy theorists, this is not disputed, however the numbers of people concerned with those people who don't think about things (the dead) is very low as we might expect, their time cannot possibly be better spent. :lol:
You're right. The dead don't think. The people that would be concerned about the dead not thinking is probably equal to the number of dead who think.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
So? That's just one thing. Then there is planning the whole thing and making sure that no-one leaked or at least that no-one leaked anything believable, rigging the planes to be controlled from a distance, conning the military into not having anything nearby that might shoot down the planes, and so on and so on. If this all happened according to the conspiracies, it took a few more than one crew of 20 people. Just screening these people to be the right sort of people that would do as you wished without spilling the beans would take a while. And you'd be bound to have a few people that you screened that actually wouldn't pass the screening. How would you keep them clammed up about the screening even let alone what they were being screened for?

Good team work. Positive results every time. If Al-Quada could satisfy all the requirements for a successful event isn't it a bit disingenuous to insist that the most powerful empire on earth could not? Certainly it is, your argument is stoopid.:lol:

PS; because the event did happen, it is a proven masterpiece of conspiracy, of that there is absolutely no doubt
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Good team work. Positive results every time. If Al-Quada could satisfy all the requirements for a successful event isn't it a bit disingenuous to insist that the most powerful empire on earth could not? Certainly it is, your argument is stoopid.:lol:
roflmao, you don't think a few people could plan to run a couple planes into buildings? roflmao That's even stupidER.
Why would they need to go through all the nonsense that you conspiracists say happened?