Israel defends its borders.
![]()
What a stoopid thing to say. Yer a racist.We will finally have Peace when it's all white.
Brings up nazisYeah, like I also am supposed to shed tears for the Nazis my uncle killed in World War Two.
Funny how you drooling morons call anyone to the right of Che Guevara a "Nazi", but those who declare their commitment to the complete genocide of Jews are "victims"
****ing idiots.
Brings up nazis
Complains about people bringing up nazis
have literally never brought up nazis in any context everDear Dimwit,
Please excuse the greenie. It was awarded by accident. Mind you, I am much more apt to give greenies than red, as I prefer throwing rose petals over throwing muck. But, this one was in error.
This little note is just meant for one purpose, to point out something that is really quite simple, like yourself.
When I bring up Nazis, I am talking about Nazis, you know......real ones. Admirers of Adolph, haters of Jews.
When you or your idiot buddy bring up Nazis, you could be talking about anyone......conservatives, classical liberals, believers in free speech, gun owners, etc etc etc.
Now, I do recognize that your limited cognitive abilities do not allow you to differentiate, so I thought I would provide you this small bit of guidannce.
You're welcome.
Yours Sincerely, Colpy
Jinentonix; said:You're f*cking high, right? Palestine declared a war of extermination against Israel in 1946 along with other Arab/Muslims states. Palestine has STILL not rescinded that declaration and yet here you are whining about how hard done by Israel they are? Gimmie a goddam break. Instead of engaging in mental masturbatory fantasies, go learn the history of the conflict. The REAL history, not the white-washed revisionist bullshit you've obviously been spoon-fed.
I'd suggest starting with the UNSCOP report from 1946. You may have to so some searching for it. I used to have a link but someone obviously doesn't want that link to get around because the last time I went to post it in here, my security software went ape shit when I went to the site. I guess too many facts spoil the narrative.
Whatever . Around and around they go .F guns just blow them to smitherenes .What the fǜck are you droning on about? UNSCOP? All Arab countries boycotted that shít. After all, who gave those pieces of shít the authority to give away Palestinian lands?
Every day we have posts made by right wingers on this forum in which they say everybody has a right to keep and bear arms in order to protect themselves from tyrannical government. We all know that what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Therefore, it logically follows that if people have unlimited rights to arms in the USA then people overseas should have that same fǜckin right.
What a great irony it would be if Americans somehow reserve gun rights exclusively for themselves but deny that right to others. It would invalidate everything they stand for.
So let's hear it forum right wingers -- LET'S SEE YOU DEMAND THAT PALESTINIANS BE FULLY ARMED with every manner of weaponry I mentioned before. This would validate what you have stood for all this time. Your failure to endorse the idea hereby permanently and unalterably invalidates it all.
Whatever . Around and around they go .F guns just blow them to smitherenes .
Why not . It is up to the Palestinian’s to determine if they have guns or not . If they aim and fire those guns at or into Israel expect return fire . Is that a yes ?Give a clear answer - do you demand that Palestinians have the same right to weapons as Americans do under the 2d Amendment and to use them as they wish to protect themselves from Israeli tyranny - yes or no?
A one word answer is what I'm looking for.
Why not . It is up to the Palestinian’s to determine if they have guns or not . If they aim and fire those guns at or into Israel expect return fire . Is that a yes ?
Gazans Have the Right to Invade Israel — At Least If You Believe One of Israel’s Justifications for the Six-Day War
By Jon Schwarz
May 16, 2018
https://theintercept.com/2018/05/16...of-israels-justifications-for-the-six-day-war
One of the key targets of the “Great March of Return” protests in Gaza, which began six weeks ago and culminated Tuesday, is Israel’s brutal, decade-long blockade of the small territory, which is about the size of Detroit. The siege has caused Gaza’s economy to shrink by one-half, and the United Nations has warned that it will soon render Gaza literally “uninhabitable.”
Gaza Could Become 'Uninhabitable' by 2020, U.N. Report Warns | Time
But there’s a stupendous historical irony to Israel’s manufactured outrage: Israel itself claimed that a far less stringent embargo by Egypt in 1967 was a legitimate casus belli for Israel to attack Egypt (which led to Israel seizing control of Gaza and eventually imposing the embargo on it).
Israel opened fire first during the Six-Day War on June 5, 1967, with an air and land attack on Egypt. But, Israel declared, Egypt had actually started the war several weeks before, when it blockaded the Straits of Tiran, which prevented Israel from shipping goods through the Red Sea.
But if it were legal for Israel to bomb and invade Egypt in 1967 and then occupy Palestinian land for decades, it logically follows that Palestinians in Gaza have had the right to attack and occupy Israel ever since the Israeli blockade began in 2007. Fair’s fair.
Israel’s 1967 legal stance can be found in a speech at the U.N. by the country’s then-Foreign Minister Abba Eban. Here’s the key paragraph:
"The blockade is by definition an act of war, imposed and enforced through armed violence. Never in history have blockade and peace existed side by side. From May 24 onward, the questions who started the war or who fired the first shot became momentously irrelevant. There is no difference in civil law between murdering a man by slow strangulation or killing him by a shot in the head. From the moment at which the blockade was imposed, active hostilities had commenced and Israel owed Egypt nothing of her Charter rights. If a foreign power sought to close Odessa or Copenhagen or Marseilles or New York harbor by the use of force, what would happen? Would there be a discussion about who had fired the first shot? Would anyone ask whether aggression had begun?"
https://theintercept.imgix.net/wp-uploads/sites/1/2018/05/idfwebsite-1526398565.jpg
Israel initially struck Egypt in 1967, after troop mobilizations and ferocious rhetoric on both sides, plus Egypt’s blockade of the Straits of Tiran. But in reality, the Straits of Tiran issue had had little impact on Israel. Only 5 percent of its trade passed through the straits, and Israel remained free to ship whatever it wanted, including goods that usually passed through the Red Sea, through its ports on the Mediterranean.
https://books.google.com/books?id=w1...ade%22&f=false
Moreover, the embargo appears to have been enforced quite lackadaisically.
In fact, Eban’s heartfelt denunciation of blockades seems far more applicable to the Israeli blockade of Gaza.
Palestinians aren't pawns of Hamas. They want freedom, just like anyone else.
Palestinian American human-rights attorney Noura Erakat says protesters in Gaza aren't pawns of Hamas; they are struggling for the freedom all humans want.
Washington Post
By Noura Erakat
May 16, 2018
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-have-no-choice-but-to-continue-the-struggle
(YouTube Video)