2SLGBTQQIA+

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,835
2,725
113
New Brunswick
Women's shelters issue warning on violent trans sex offender

Author of the article:Brad Hunter
Published Jun 09, 2023 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

Stephanie Green is back in the saddle.


The registered sex offender who identifies as female, fresh from her ordeal in the Parry Sound jail, is once again looking for a roof and a warm meal.


Sounds heartwarming, doesn’t it? But women’s shelters around the province aren’t getting warm fuzzies about the 26-year-old, legally known as Shane Green.

Instead, the Toronto Sun has learned they are raising the alarm about the violent sex offender.

In August 2022, Green sexually assaulted a woman in a Parry Sound women’s shelter. There was also verbal harassment.

This past April, Green, of Mississauga of the Credit First Nation (formerly of Brantford), pleaded guilty to sexual assault and two counts of breaching probation.

“Particularly aggravating in these circumstances — and you heard [the victim impact statement] speak to that — that in a place of safety …. there was a violation of herself there and a violation of what the shelter stands for. It’s a place where people escape from severe traumas in their lives,” Crown Attorney Ellaree Metz told the court.


Green was sentenced to time served in jail of 235 days, juiced to 352 days’ pre-sentence custody, plus two years of probation with a condition to take counselling. DNA and a permanent spot on the federal sex offender registry were the sweeteners.

Fast forward to several days ago when a shelter in Southwestern Ontario issued an SOS to watch out for Green.

A memo obtained by the Sun offers this missive: “In the past two weeks this person has contacted REDACTED and REDACTED requesting space. They presented as a Transwoman, recently victimized by intimate partner violence, homeless, lost custody of two children (and wanted to regain custody).”

Arrangements were made for a ride from Brantford but Green allegedly never showed. Then, the shelter employees called cops to file a missing persons report. Cops then told them exactly who Stephanie Green is.


Officers told the shelter ladies: Green has no kids, is NOT homeless, also uses the name Kelsey Adams, presents to shelters as transgender but is male-identified. The trans trick is a ruse to get inside women’s shelters, cops said.

Oh, and Green has a history of sexual violence.

Bottom line? Green is very dangerous.

The memo adds: “They have called repeatedly over the past four days, requesting to speak with specific staff and asking inappropriate questions/comments.”

Several different police services “strongly advised shelter not to let this person into the shelter system. We have also been told that they are on the registered sex offenders list with a high likelihood of reoffending.”

At Green’s court appearance in April, their lawyer noted that coming out “has been a really big deal … to really live her truth and be upfront about it, open about it.”


It appears that “truth” thing remains a struggle.

“These are people who are progressive and really reluctant to speak out on this issue,” a source familiar with the situation told the Sun. “That will tell you how dangerous Shane Green is.”

That is the Shane Green who in 2018 was convicted of dragging a 15-year-old female McDonald’s employee into a bathroom stall. Green — a hulking 6-foot-2, 230-pounder — then attacked the victim.

So, we have Green 2.0.

As one law enforcement source told me last year, Green knows the ins and outs of the system. They also know that in these woke times, there’s a good chance they’ll get their way.

What shelter worker wants to deal with a star chamber, right?

Stephanie Green, coming soon to a town near you.

bhunter@postmedia.com

@HunterTOSun

POS needs to be kept in jail because he obviously will offend again.

And why do I 'misgender' him? Because he's not trans. Sadly, he's one of the few predators who uses the trans issue to get into places he shouldn't be, and then ruins it for real trans people who need help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoof Hearted

Hoof Hearted

House Member
Jul 23, 2016
4,477
1,173
113
I think the far Right secretly enjoy these news stories. It bolsters their position that trans people are at heart, deviant and dangerous individuals.

Newsflash:

There are assholes from all walks of life. If this person didn't exist, the far Right would have invented him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Serryah

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,726
3,534
113
Female-only spa with mandatory nudity ordered to let in trans women with male genitals
Author of the article:Denette Wilford
Published Jun 09, 2023 • Last updated 1 day ago • 2 minute read

A female-only spa in Washington state where nudity is mandatory must admit transgender women who still have their male body parts.


A judge ordered family-owned Olympus Spa to admit pre-op trans women with penises after an activist complained the owner previously banned them.


The Korean spa, which is modelled on Jjimjilbang, gender-segregated bath houses in Korea, rejected Haven Wilvich’s application in January 2020 and allegedly told her she wasn’t welcome, the Daily Mail reported.

Wilvich complained to the Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC), stating she was a transgender woman who was “biologically male” and had not undergone sex reassignment surgery.

She claimed that Olympus Spa told her “transgender women without surgery are not welcome because it could make other customers and staff uncomfortable.”



In March 2021, the WSHRC served spa owner Myoon Woon Lee and the spa’s president Sun Lee with a Notice of Complaint of Discrimination.

Sun released a statement standing by the spa’s decision, explaining the facility was a “women’s Korean traditional health spa” and nudity was required for certain treatments, according to the Mail.

“We firmly believe it is essential for the safety, legal protection, and well-being of our customers and employees that we maintain adherence to this adaptation of a females-only rule,” Sun wrote, adding the spa was “willing to consider a review of (its) current biological females only policy.”



The spa’s president and owner added that they are both Christian and said their faith was another reason they did not want to let biological males into the facility.

They also disputed Wilvich’s claims, saying there was no documentation they ever entered the spa.

The WSHRC, however, upheld their ruling and the spa is required to remove all references to “biological women” on their website and provide staff with inclusivity training, according to a settlement agreement that allows them to avoid prosecution.

The spa argued that their First Amendment rights had been violated, but the court didn’t back down and told Olympus they had 30 days to amend their complaint and refile.

They did but Washington District court Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein dismissed their lawsuit and upheld the WSHRC’s original ruling, explaining the measures taken to prevent the spa from having a female-only policy had been lawful.

Wilvich celebrated the initial WSHRC ruling in 2021, posting on Facebook.

“I did it! I worked with the WSHRC and got Olympus Spa (the main naked lady spa in the area) to change their policies and allow all self-identified women access regardless of surgery and genitals.”
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Taxslave2