$10 a Day Child Care

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Ya.... In reading your bait, it's easy to see how dumb kids turn out - whether they're fuking or not

We threw kids under the bus a long time ago in this country. The whole system is based on our kids paying for our expenses.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
I certainly thought so, but perhaps you could fill me in on what you don't understand. I really thought it is quite straight forward!

Here is my question. If the whole system is based on our kids paying off all the services we are enjoying today. Don't you think its only fare to kids that we support every possible way of stimulating population growth that it be birth rates or immigration?

Because dealing with the debt we are going to leave them will be much easier to pay if they are 5 times more kids paying it.

Or should we just say. Fuk them and throw them under the bus? Why should we care how hard it is for them to pay for our debt?

Because if we only birth half of the anticipated population needed to pay the debt we are producing because no one can afford the cost of having kids. We both know the few kids we have are totally fuked.

May as well throw them in the wood chipper now. It will be more human to do so then to let them be stuck living in endless financial slavery. One their parents enjoyed on the backs of to few kids promised to repay
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
And here is why, I have no respect for elders and never will have any. Our whole Canadian system is based on making our kids pay for it. Buying & then selling the whole thing to kids for 5 times the price they bought the things.

Boomers can all go fuk themselves. A bunch of scamming dickheads all of them. The world will be a better place once they are all dead.

Retirement money is all based on 7 kids for each person paying it off.

So if we only make one kid instead of 7, think it's fair for that one kid?

I know, right? Who gives a shit about kids. Throw them under the bus you fuking dickhead boomers

Hey here is a idea. Lets all benefit from all the services we enjoy based on a accounting strategy of being able to have 7 of our kids pay it off, But wait!!!!! Fuk everyone having kids. They can pay for them.

Meanwhile. The only reason both parents have to work, is to pay off the house some dumb fuk boomer sold them for 10 times what they bought it for.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
And here is why, I have no respect for elders and never will have any. Our whole Canadian system is based on making our kids pay for it. Buying & then selling the whole thing to kids for 5 times the price they bought the things.

Boomers can all go fuk themselves. A bunch of scamming dickheads all of them. The world will be a better place once they are all dead.

Retirement money is all based on 7 kids for each person paying it off.

So if we only make one kid instead of 7, think it's fair for that one kid?

I know, right? Who gives a shit about kids. Throw them under the bus you fuking dickhead boomers

Hey here is a idea. Lets all benefit from all the services we enjoy based on a accounting strategy of being able to have 7 of our kids pay it off, But wait!!!!! Fuk everyone having kids. They can pay for them.

Meanwhile. The only reason both parents have to work, is to pay off the house some dumb fuk boomer sold them for 10 times what they bought it for.


wow, didn't think that anyone could get so much wrong and still have the brain power to use a computer.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
:laughing3: At least im not a boomer or a feminist. Im better then both of you dickheads
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Did you have 7 kids to pay off you're benefits you enjoy?


As a matter of fact, yes, we had 7 kids. age 22 to 38. I also own a small 3 bedroom house that I just bought 3 years ago and we are basically a single income family, mine. I am a Boomer. Unlike you, though, I have worked my ass off my entire life to pay for what I have and I don't whine and bitch, like you do, about how hard I have had or have it. 5 out of my 7 kids own their own homes with my 2 youngest owning and single, so that would be a single income also.

:laughing3: At least im not a boomer or a feminist. Im better then both of you dickheads


No, you're a whiny assed, uneducated, moron.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Here is my question. If the whole system is based on our kids paying off all the services we are enjoying today. Don't you think its only fare to kids that we support every possible way of stimulating population growth that it be birth rates or immigration?

Because dealing with the debt we are going to leave them will be much easier to pay if they are 5 times more kids paying it.

Or should we just say. Fuk them and throw them under the bus? Why should we care how hard it is for them to pay for our debt?

Because if we only birth half of the anticipated population needed to pay the debt we are producing because no one can afford the cost of having kids. We both know the few kids we have are totally fuked.

May as well throw them in the wood chipper now. It will be more human to do so then to let them be stuck living in endless financial slavery. One their parents enjoyed on the backs of to few kids promised to repay


I wouldn't have a clue what the correct answer is. Probably as many different answers as there are people is as good as any. I suppose once there were 5 times as many educated and fully employed kids paying the debt it would help. Tell me something, how would the average person today raise and educate 10 kids?
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
As a matter of fact, yes, we had 7 kids. age 22 to 38. I also own a small 3 bedroom house that I just bought 3 years ago and we are basically a single income family, mine. I am a Boomer. Unlike you, though, I have worked my ass off my entire life to pay for what I have and I don't whine and bitch, like you do, about how hard I have had or have it. 5 out of my 7 kids own their own homes with my 2 youngest owning and single, so that would be a single income also.

I can respect that.