Search results

Yup. He's a loon. He also claims to have a cure for HIV/AIDS in the works. It's funny to me too. Take some of the deniers we have on this forum. If you were to go through their posts, I'm sure you would even find contradictory arguments. Like the greenhouse effect has been falsified, and...

I wouldn't know, no person is infallible in my book. But that's me.

IPCC clearly overestimates the extent of Arctic sea ice minimums:

And in English it's called gossip. It certainly doesn't belong in this thread, but I guess in the minds of deniers anything Gore=climate change...

I've watched most of it. I skipped the introductions. You can watch the entire presentation here: John Abraham's reply to Lord Christopher Monckton

I found this, but the data stops in 1990: Here's what I get in excel, with a trend line: The trendline is rising at about 0.3°C per decade. That's about double the global trend.

He ripped Monckton pretty good! The telling thing to me, and what makes Monckton a firm denier, is that even when he's made aware that he's misinterpretted someone's work, or when he's caught outright making stuff up, he doesn't remove that material from his presentations. I mean even Gore...

Yes, that's what I was looking at. Specifically I wanted to see how the climate has changed since the 60's. It's not which year was the hottest or coldest on this day that matters for climate, but the long term average weather.

You're just replacing one authority with another. Selective doubt. Not very objective.

Van, if I was going to check the weather near you, which weather station would that be?

Right, because some crackpot said so is apparently good enough for you ehh? How is that any different than the yobs who eat up the crap spewed out on television beav? Mr. Kettle, hows the fish?

Do you know the difference between signal and noise?

Sure he does. Now show us how many clues you have, and explain why you think a change over two years is noteworthy? Is it even outside the standard deviation of the long-term trend?

Well it didn't take ten years to build all the infrastructure we have now. The difference is, if you accept that something needs to be done, then it needs to be done much more quickly. Leveling off atmospheric concentrations is the goal. They should look at what works in other countries then...

If you don't worry about it, how is it you post so much of this tripe? You have to be looking to find it...

Spectroscopic evidence says otherwise. And regarding the ocean tides, global warming is also concomitant with ocean acidification, another huge problem.

The topic of this thread is what to do about global warming. Further deviations will lead to moved posts. There's plenty of threads on this forum discussing the physical basis of global warming and climate change.

Novel drug delivery. I know it pains the black helicopter crowd that they won't be able to harp on about thimerosal, but I'm sure they'll adapt with new stupid crap to peddle on their websites.

The University of Virginia is fighting back against the McCarthy tactics of Virgina Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli in his case against UVa and Michael Mann. In their response to the court, the UVa petitions for the civil investigative demand (CID) to be set aside. In their court documents...

We're prolific posters here! If you show up infrequently you get buried. ;-)