9/11 Truth Manifesto

[jimshort19]

Lone Wolf, :"...more coincidences that have happen in relevance to the matter that the odds number is astronomical."

And that's an lot of coincidenceses! Relevanting to the matter! That odds numbers is astromological!

My goodness you demand much of your mentors1 Lone Wolf, you are working too hard. And I have no-one to pick on. If you would but bare your own throat, I'd bite.

 

[lone wolf]

Lone Wolf, :"...more coincidences that have happen in relevance to the matter that the odds number is astronomical."

And that's an lot of coincidenceses! Relevanting to the matter! That odds numbers is astromological!

My goodness you demand much of your mentors1 Lone Wolf, you are working too hard. And I have no-one to pick on. If you would but bare your own throat, I'd bite.

Ahh.... I'm not much of a gambler any more. Something has that familiar odour about it and the safe money says it fell from the south end of a northbound bull. Putting the pieces together (and pizzin the odd folk off along the way) keeps this mind sharp.

Woof!

 

[Stretch]

Michelle Malkin a 9/11 Truther?
Then there's the eight-minute gap from the time all cell phone calls from the plane ceased and the time it crashed. Although both the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder were recovered, not a single scrap about what was on the black boxes has been officially released. This despite the government's otherwise routine release of such information. (Recall that after American Airlines Flight 587 crashed in New York last November, the feds released detailed information from one of the black boxes within less than two days.)
Posted Jan 3, 2008 10:31 AM PST
Category: 911
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8801

 

[Avro]

Geez, I'm not which is worse, a 9/11 truther or a climate change denier.

 

[Stretch]

Geez, I'm not which is worse, a 9/11 truther or a climate change denier.

meaning?

 

[darkbeaver]

Meaning it missed a word, the twit can't even troll properly.:lol:

 

[darkbeaver]

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18999.htm

The NIST Report on the World Trade Center Collapse one year later: ​

Still Dead On Arrival​

By Mark H. Gaffney​

A note to the reader: In December 2006 Mark H. Gaffney posted a scathing critique of the US government’s official report about the WTC collapse on 9/11. One year later, the case is stronger than ever. * *
01/04/08 "ICH " -- - -In August 2002 the US Congress authorized the National Institute for Safety and Transportation (NIST) to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. The official instruction was not limited to conducting a building performance study, as some have claimed.[1] The primary stated objective of the investigation was to determine the cause of the collapse–––no less.[2]


When NIST released its final report in September 2005, critics charged that the agency had ignored evidence of explosions in the towers. The agency responded by asserting its scientific laurels. NIST insisted that its “200 technical experts” had conducted “an extremely thorough investigation.” NIST boasted that its staff “reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations,” yet, found “no corroborating evidence for a controlled demolition.” NIST also claimed that it had considered “a number of hypotheses for the collapse of the towers.”[3]

No doubt, many Americans were persuaded by this snow-job. Sad to say, few of our countrymen (or women) bother to read official reports, especially when they run to 10,000 pages. The persistent individuals who do, however, know that there are sound reasons to question all of the above; because a close reading of the NIST report shows that the agency assumed from the beginning that the Boeing 767 impacts and subsequent fires were responsible for the collapse of the twin towers. The report gives no consideration whatsoever to alternative hypotheses, including the possible use of explosives, the leading candidate. Far from exploring other scenarios, NIST simply took it for granted that the impacts set in motion a chain of events leading to a catastrophic structural failure. Working backwards, NIST scientists searched for evidence that supported their predetermined conclusion. Everything else was ignored or excluded. If it is not already evident to the reader, this is no way to conduct a scientific investigation. NIST then had the audacity to imply that it arrived at its favored collapse model through an exhaustive process of elimination. Most readers who merely browsed NIST’s 2005 Executive Summary probably were not aware that NIST’s stated conclusion was really an assumption. Consider this passage, for example:
“The tragic consequences of the September 11, 2001 attacks were directly attributable to the fact that terrorists flew large jet-fuel laden commercial airliners into the WTC towers. Buildings for use by the general population are not designed to withstand attacks of such severity; building codes do not require building designs to consider aircraft impact.”[4]

The above comment about building codes is deceptive–––NIST readily concedes in its report that the towers survived the initial impacts. In fact, John Skilling, the structural engineer who designed the WTC, always claimed that they would. The towers survived, despite serious damage, because they were hugely overbuilt, redundant by design. Although the WTC’s soaring lines gave the im

 

[Stretch]

9/11 - 2/1/2006 BYU Professor Steven E Jones WTC Lecture UVSC
BYU Physics professor and founder of SCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH Steven E Jones presents his presentation on the collapse of WTC Buildings 1,2, ... all » and 7 on 9/11. A very informative and scientific presentation that raises serious questions about the official account of the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7
Posted Jan 13, 2008 04:48 PM PST
Category: 911

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=964034652002408586

 

[darkbeaver]

Main Japanese Opposition Party Questions 9/11 in Parliament Broadcast on Japanese public TV
- 2008-01-15
This incident is telling.

Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 - by Alan Miller - 2008-01-15

 

[jimshort19]

Japan financed a good portion, 16 billion dollars, of the first Persian Gulf war. This kind of thing is not new.

The 9/11 event should be more exhaustively investigated if only to prevent it from joining the JFK murder as a conspiracy theory that will not go away.

The article references trading that evidences foreknowledge of the disaster. I have never heard of this, and there is no other evidence of anything even like conspiracy mentioned in the article. Let us consider the evidence, such as it is. What is this evidence, this trading?

 

[darkbeaver]

Japan financed a good portion, 16 billion dollars, of the first Persian Gulf war. This kind of thing is not new.

The 9/11 event should be more exhaustively investigated if only to prevent it from joining the JFK murder as a conspiracy theory that will not go away.

The article references trading that evidences foreknowledge of the disaster. I have never heard of this, and there is no other evidence of anything even like conspiracy mentioned in the article. Let us consider the evidence, such as it is. What is this evidence, this trading?

Google 911 insider trading. Consideration of evidence always raises questions of conspiracy, by definition, see forensic investigation If you can after investigation arrive at conclusions not supported by forensic evidence, then your opinion can be safely relegated to the bottom of the resume pile. Maybe you need to aim your expectations a little lower in the job market Jim. You can't start at the top of the corporate ladder you know.:lol:

 

[Logic 7]

Do you know how many holes have been punched in all those theories?

If they were a bowl to begin with, they'ld be a collinder now.

For starters the WTC buildings were a revolutionary and exclusive design. No data on record to determine how that type of skeletal structure would react to such an event.

Then we have the first of its kind of event.

Never in the history of aviation or construction, has such an event of identicle circumstances taken place.

This video proves , withouth any doubt, that those who still believe 9-11 official story, are just retarded, .

 

[darkbeaver]

How ya doin Logic7? It's good times for our side what? Anyway we should be politically correct and not refer to the retards as retards. A more humane terminology would be those "severly mentally challenged twits" which is better than saying severly retarded twits when we refer to retarded official 911 therorist twits.:lol:

 

[Logic 7]

How ya doin Logic7? It's good times for our side what? Anyway we should be politically correct and not refer to the retards as retards. A more humane terminology would be those "severly mentally challenged twits" which is better than saying severly retarded twits when we refer to retarded official 911 therorist twits.:lol:

I undertstand what you mean,and i totally respect your behavior, however i have no problem calling people what they are deserve to be called.

It has been 5 years for 9-11, and they have still no evidence whatsover regarding the official story,US governement, and all fakes nist report can't even show how building 7 collapse, and those people are calling us conspiracy theorist,

 

[dirtylinder]

Geez, I'm not which is worse, a 9/11 truther or a climate change denier.

Climate change has and will continue to happen regardless of what humans do to the atmosphere...thank goodness there are 911 truther, there are enough deniars about it!

 

[darkbeaver]

I undertstand what you mean,and i totally respect your behavior, however i have no problem calling people what they are deserve to be called.

It has been 5 years for 9-11, and they have still no evidence whatsover regarding the official story,US governement, and all fakes nist report can't even show how building 7 collapse, and those people are calling us conspiracy theorist,

OK I guess they're just plain retarded, and or working for the bad guys.

 

[Stretch]

BREAKING 9/11 NEWS: FBI Says Barbara Olsen Did Not Call Ted Olsen. Bush Solicitor General LIED !!
We were fed a lie by Ted Olsen who served as Solictor General for the Bush Administration, when on 9/11 he held a press conference to tell America and the world that his dead wife had called him before her demise from the jet she was on that had just been hijacked. It was a lie. The [COLOR=blue! important][FONT=arial, sans-serif][COLOR=blue! important][FONT=arial, sans-serif]FBI[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] has reported that no such call between Barbara Olsen and Ted Olsen ever took place on 9/11/2001.

Posted Feb 20, 2008 05:13 PM PST
Category: 911
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_bill_dou_080219_breaking_9_2f11_news_3a_.htm

 

[Stretch]

[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Still unanswered miracles of 9/11 [/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]'Americans are not quite ready to look into the Pandora's Box of 9/11 because the implications are truly breathtaking and staggering but as each shocking abuse of power of the Cheney/Bush regime is revealed to America ~ the public becomes more open to the possibility of a monstrous deception beneath the unanswered 9/11 miracles.'[/FONT]​

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_allen_l__080219_still_unanswered_9_2f1.htm

 

[Toro]

This video proves , withouth any doubt, that those who still believe 9-11 official story, are just retarded, .

Oh, its good to see Logic back! I thought maybe THEY had come from for him/her.

I didn't click on the link Logic. Are there are tapes of planes edited out of the tape? Are there holograms? Is there anything by people who have no depth perception who try to point out where trees should/shouldn't be? Any spaceships?

I'd hate to watch the video if there wasn't anything interesting like that!

 

[Stretch]

911 Explosive laden van 2-3 arrests

Posted Feb 26, 2008 07:25 AM PST
Category: 911


Video confirming that [COLOR=blue! important][FONT=arial, sans-serif][COLOR=blue! important][FONT=arial, sans-serif]van[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] full of explosives was found on 9-11 and the occupants arrested.
From the way this story "went away",, one is left to conclude that these were more Mossad agents. "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.