Yeah, I know all about it, we've both had to take it as part of our employer's ideas on useful training, and I've researched it a fair bit on my own as well. We both scored very similarly, but trust me, you do not want to get this hard-nosed old skeptic started on that subject.
LOL okay, I can respect that although I fully disagree with your conclusions.
The kindest thing I can say about it is that I think, in common with most personality profiling techniques I've encountered, it's shallow and artificial.
Once again, I can respect your conclusions but must say, that has not been my experience at all.
And one of the reasons you don't want to get me started on it is because the people who own the rights to the name and the tests are very litigious. In fact if they saw your mention of it you'd probably get a nasty letter telling you the name is trade marked and you must write it this way: Myers-Briggs ™.
While it may well be their trademark you can find various forms of it all over the internet. The interpretations are fairly similar. I do not believe we can ever fully define another by their test scores on things. While I have taken courses in Myers Brigg and
adore Jung (I truly believe he was brilliant) who came up with his own personality profile which was very similar at the same time as the ladies did, skepticism is healthy. Everything is merely a guideline. If used correctly it can help us to understand varying personality types and how they think. If used incorrectly it can pigeon hole people and leave us more ignorant than we began.
Everything is about what WE do with it. How WE use it.
For the record my Myers Brigg personality score is one profile for work and almost opposite for my personal preference in daily life. I like that as work and personal life are opposite in approach for me.
This is merely preference folks,
preference.... it's not written in stone. If we chose to view it that way though, of course it is.