Fake CNN video on 9-11

[lone wolf]

Building and smoke would be in the way of a projection beam ... and you would need three cyclic beams (X axial, Y axial and Z axial - or vertical, horizontal and lateral) - that means THREE projection points - and something from which to rebound (ie: cloud, prism) for a 3D image. Hell. that's probably the news chopper who was taking the pictures of the plane that doesn't exist.

Wolf

 

[Just the Facts]

You are wrong, there is nothing at all, we can see the boat on the water, very easily which they are smaller, the news reporter doesnt see nothing at all, so get real.

Nice try. At about 10 seconds into the video you can see the plane come into the picture from the top of the frame, between the spire of the North Tower and the right edge of the picture. It's very faint but you can actually follow it from the top right of the picture cutting down towards the center of the picture where it disappears behind the tower, then at just the right amount of elapsed time you see the fireball.

That's as real as it gets.

 

[TenPenny]

Explain to me why on this video there is no plane?

Umm, I hate to tell you, but the government must have messed with youtube, because in that video I can see the plane come in from top right.

You either need glasses, or a better monitor.

 

[lone wolf]

Lots easier to see if you go full screen....

Wolf

 

[Toro]

It took me a few times, but I did see it. It is pretty faint.

It looks like it was edited out.

And by "it," I mean the hologram.

 

[wallyj]

Logic,I am still waiting for the name of someone involved in this crime/cover-up,JUST ONE NAME.Can't do it ,can you?

 

[I think not]

ITN saw an Hologram

:lol:

Man I give up!

 

[lone wolf]

Did you hear it too? Holograms are silent (unless someone out there has a really boss set of Telefunkens)

Wolf

 

[Just the Facts]

Did you hear it too? Holograms are silent (unless someone out there has a really boss set of Telefunkens)

Wolf

Yeah the sound system was in WTC 7 :smile:

 

[Toro]

With Logic's "Hologram Theory," I'd just like to thank Logic for boosting the credibility of us non-conspiracists far better than I ever could.

 

[Logic 7]

Umm, I hate to tell you, but the government must have messed with youtube, because in that video I can see the plane come in from top right.

You either need glasses, or a better monitor.

Wow, you guys must be super human eyes, even the reporter doesnt see a plane, she report it like it is an explosion , get real

 

[Logic 7]

Building and smoke would be in the way of a projection beam ... and you would need three cyclic beams (X axial, Y axial and Z axial - or vertical, horizontal and lateral) - that means THREE projection points - and something from which to rebound (ie: cloud, prism) for a 3D image. Hell. that's probably the news chopper who was taking the pictures of the plane that doesn't exist.

Wolf

That is why BUilding 7 was destroyed, all secret service offices were there + there was about 5 o 6 chopper + other plane.

 

[Logic 7]

Nice try. At about 10 seconds into the video you can see the plane come into the picture from the top of the frame, between the spire of the North Tower and the right edge of the picture. It's very faint but you can actually follow it from the top right of the picture cutting down towards the center of the picture where it disappears behind the tower, then at just the right amount of elapsed time you see the fireball.

That's as real as it gets.

You don't see a plane, first of all you see a black object coming very fast, the plane is supposed to be white, not black,+ it is way too small to be a comercial airliner, , nice try though.

 

[wallyj]

You don't see a plane, first of all you see a black object coming very fast, the plane is supposed to be white, not black,+ it is way too small to be a comercial airliner, , nice try though.

Hey logic,it is me again. I have been waitng for a name of someone who admits being involved in the planning,implementation, and cover-up of 9/11. JUST ONE NAME. I will make it easier for you,one name of your hologram experts will suffice. I will be waiting with bait on my breath. (goin fishing).

 

[lone wolf]

Wow, you guys must be super human eyes, even the reporter doesnt see a plane, she report it like it is an explosion , get real

The reporter, just like everybody who was watching, was focussed on the fire. Why would she be checking a horizon - other than the most rudimentary of scans - when WTC was her point of interest? Owing to distance, the plane first appears as a speck. Owing to the fact, during the final seconds of its flight, it was hidden by a building, it couldn't be seen from her point of vantage.

The colour of the plane? That's as much a source of contradiction as the pod slung beneath it. Both aircraft were quite real - just as real as the twin towers. Two planes went boom. Two buildings fell under mysterious curcumstances. Three thousand innocent lives were lost - for who's purpose?

Somewhere in between Uncle Sam's cries of foul and the ravings of the science fiction crowd lays the truth. The broader the spectrum, the harder it will be to discover. One thing is certain. We all heard a lot of deception.

Wolf

 

[EagleSmack]

:lol:

Man I give up!

Face it ITN... you saw a hologram.

 

[Logic 7]

Hey logic,it is me again. I have been waitng for a name of someone who admits being involved in the planning,implementation, and cover-up of 9/11. JUST ONE NAME. I will make it easier for you,one name of your hologram experts will suffice. I will be waiting with bait on my breath. (goin fishing).

Well this guys was an MI5 officers, he has left secrets services because he joined them to stop terrorism, not become part of the game,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5403286136814574974



you must tell yourself, he isnt real, well this is the proof , he is not a joke, he left secrets service to tell the story to the news, he did, and was arrested and put in jail, to have revealed secret document to the public.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/216877.stm

 

[DurkaDurka]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/216877.stm

That story doesn't even mention 911, Logic. You really are grasping at straws aren't you?

 

[Logic 7]

The reporter, just like everybody who was watching, was focussed on the fire. Why would she be checking a horizon - other than the most rudimentary of scans - when WTC was her point of interest? Owing to distance, the plane first appears as a speck. Owing to the fact, during the final seconds of its flight, it was hidden by a building, it couldn't be seen from her point of vantage.

The colour of the plane? That's as much a source of contradiction as the pod slung beneath it. Both aircraft were quite real - just as real as the twin towers. Two planes went boom. Two buildings fell under mysterious curcumstances. Three thousand innocent lives were lost - for who's purpose?

Somewhere in between Uncle Sam's cries of foul and the ravings of the science fiction crowd lays the truth. The broader the spectrum, the harder it will be to discover. One thing is certain. We all heard a lot of deception.

Wolf

the plane were real? how do you know? why cnn had to show a fake video?
how come fox, and many others had to zoom to see the plane going to the wtc? like this one.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=eLAMoHUtct8&mode=related&search=




The plane went boom and there was no debris from the plane on the ground, just this fact, is just impossible, you look at the plane going to the building, the buildings swallows it, again just impossible.

There is many witnesses who called cnn, and tell them they saw the explosion, but with absotly no plane, + fake video provided by cnn, why?

 

[Logic 7]

That story doesn't even mention 911, Logic. You really are grasping at straws aren't you?

i am laughing really hard at you right now, thankx, the first link the same guy talks about 9-11, the second link, is to show, that what this guys is saying is real, nice try.