Fake CNN video on 9-11

[DurkaDurka]

i am laughing really hard at you right now, thankx, the first link the same guy talks about 9-11, the second link, is to show, that what this guys is saying is real, nice try.

I don't have the time to watch everyone one of your crackerjack YouTube movies Logic. So he talks about 911 in the first movie and the second link, which portrays him as a traitor makes him credible somehow?

You need to get your self a hobby dude, your obsession with 911 is pathetic at best.

 

[Logic 7]

I don't have the time to watch everyone one of your crackerjack YouTube movies Logic. So he talks about 911 in the first movie and the second link, which portrays him as a traitor makes him credible somehow?

You need to get your self a hobby dude, your obsession with 911 is pathetic at best.

You don't have time to watch what i bring, but you come with an opinion on it, and You call a guy a traitor to have revealed secret document to the public? are you in complete control of your brain or what?

 

[lone wolf]

http://youtube.com/watch?v=k70Jr1oQ8bY&mode=related&search=

No zoom until after the hit....

Don't forget, Logic7.... Every eyewitness was also an ear witness. Holograms are created with light - NO SOUND. I'm a "how-do-they-do-that" kind of guy. Can you give me an explanation of how they created a hologram - realistic from every angle - that creates sound (with the appropriate doppler effect no matter where one stood) and can be tracked on radar?

Yes, there are a lot of truths being distorted about 911. There is a lot of denial. I doubt that a person who can't even fly a Cessna on VFR could take over a commercial jet thousands of feet up and navigate it anywhere but straight into the ground. Auto pilot just doesn't work that way and a Boeing is not designed for seat-of-the-pants flight. I doubt that unevenly distributed fire would cause every component of a structural steel building to fail at the same time so it could fall straight down.

These are real points to ponder. Holograms and black magic are just as "out there" as the government fairy tale.

Wolf

Edit: You havin' fun with this ain'cha?

 

[EagleSmack]

http://youtube.com/watch?v=k70Jr1oQ8bY&mode=related&search=

No zoom until after the hit....

Don't forget, Logic7.... Every eyewitness was also an ear witness. Holograms are created with light - NO SOUND. I'm a "how-do-they-do-that" kind of guy. Can you give me an explanation of how they created a hologram - realistic from every angle - that creates sound (with the appropriate doppler effect no matter where one stood) and can be tracked on radar?

Yes, there are a lot of truths being distorted about 911. There is a lot of denial. I doubt that a person who can't even fly a Cessna on VFR could take over a commercial jet thousands of feet up and navigate it anywhere but straight into the ground. Auto pilot just doesn't work that way and a Boeing is not designed for seat-of-the-pants flight. I doubt that unevenly distributed fire would cause every component of a structural steel building to fail at the same time so it could fall straight down.

These are real points to ponder. Holograms and black magic are just as "out there" as the government fairy tale.

Wolf

Edit: You havin' fun with this ain'cha?

I don't think he can give you an explanation of how they did the hologram... all he knows is that it IS a hologram and that is that. The mechanations and the technology to create a hologram, i.e how it is done and how impossible it is to create a hologram from all of those different angles, the sound of the jets, no... the moving sound of the jets, the missing jets, the missing people that were on those jets, are all irrelavent.

To Logic... it was a hologram. No facts, no evidence to the contrary, no eyewitness will sway him. That is that, end of discussion.

This weekend I met the brother of a woman who was on the flight that hit WTC1. That was the first plane strike of the morning. I met him at my wife's company picnic where the woman worked as her family gets invited every year still. She was real... and she was killed that morning. She did not ride a hologram into WTC 1.

Logic... did you know that remains from the flight have been identified and not every person was vaporized that morning? If they got on planes in Boston and their remains ended up in NY... how did they get there? A hologram?

 

[DaSleeper]

Rosie O'Donnell agrees so it must be true see ROSIE

 

[DurkaDurka]

Rosie O'Donnell agrees so it must be true see ROSIE

Besides the fact that Rosie is one sexy Mama... she is also delusional.

 

[Logic 7]

http://youtube.com/watch?v=k70Jr1oQ8bY&mode=related&search=

No zoom until after the hit....

Don't forget, Logic7.... Every eyewitness was also an ear witness. Holograms are created with light - NO SOUND. I'm a "how-do-they-do-that" kind of guy. Can you give me an explanation of how they created a hologram - realistic from every angle - that creates sound (with the appropriate doppler effect no matter where one stood) and can be tracked on radar?

Yes, there are a lot of truths being distorted about 911. There is a lot of denial. I doubt that a person who can't even fly a Cessna on VFR could take over a commercial jet thousands of feet up and navigate it anywhere but straight into the ground. Auto pilot just doesn't work that way and a Boeing is not designed for seat-of-the-pants flight. I doubt that unevenly distributed fire would cause every component of a structural steel building to fail at the same time so it could fall straight down.

These are real points to ponder. Holograms and black magic are just as "out there" as the government fairy tale.

Wolf

Edit: You havin' fun with this ain'cha?

At least you don't take the us official story as a fact,You are honestly the first one who really try to understand.

Here is a witness who didnt see a plane, listen carefully

http://youtube.com/watch?v=PVcc5AxE5M0&mode=related&search=


here is another one......

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-zw1CMJnYgg&mode=related&search=



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqjKeBS1JwE&mode=related&search=



And hologram on 9-11 werent perfect, here is the proof.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1rsfXeyH2Y&mode=related&search=

Now press pause and look at the plane, the wings are mostly not there, and since the camera almost doesnt move, there is no reason for the wings to disapeer.

 

[hermanntrude]

At least you don't take the us official story as a fact,You are honestly the first one who really try to understand.

Here is a witness who didnt see a plane, listen carefully

http://youtube.com/watch?v=PVcc5AxE5M0&mode=related&search=


here is another one......

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-zw1CMJnYgg&mode=related&search=

so what about the witnesses who DID see a plane, heard it, smelt the dust of the wreckage?

what about the people who lost relatives ON those planes, and what about the dead bodies of the people who were In those planes?

don't tell me.... holograms

 

[EagleSmack]

so what about the witnesses who DID see a plane, heard it, smelt the dust of the wreckage?

what about the people who lost relatives ON those planes, and what about the dead bodies of the people who were In those planes?

don't tell me.... holograms

Good luck getting an answer.

 

[hermanntrude]

ha. The only reason I question Logic is to try and figure out whether he really believes his bull**** or he's actually a troll.

 

[Toro]

so what about the witnesses who DID see a plane, heard it, smelt the dust of the wreckage?

what about the people who lost relatives ON those planes, and what about the dead bodies of the people who were In those planes?

don't tell me.... holograms

Yes, that's what Logic is saying.

 

[TenPenny]

You don't see a plane, first of all you see a black object coming very fast, the plane is supposed to be white, not black,+ it is way too small to be a comercial airliner, , nice try though.

You are one funny lunatic. I didn't see anything black, I saw a blurry (for you = moving FAST) outline of an aircraft come into the picture. In case you don't understand that part, things that move quickly are blurry.

I'm glad you're enjoying your delusions, they certainly provide lots of entertainment for the rest of us.
I can't wait for your next installment, but then again, I'm being paid by Bush's secret fund.

 

[Toro]

I pretty sure you could only see a fuzzy outline because of the amateur editing job created to fool people like Logic.

 

[lone wolf]

I pretty sure you could only see a fuzzy outline because of the amateur editing job created to fool people like Logic.

Amateur editing? Naww ... it has more to do with focus. These guys explain better than I can:
http://www.dummies.com/WileyCDA/DummiesArticle/id-868.html

Wolf

 

[Toro]

Thanks wolf.

 

[Cosmo]

Wow, you guys still on this??

I've been busy watching, reading and checking everything I can find on the topic of 9/11. No, I stayed away from The Onion, for those who might ask!

Something is askew. Some of the reporting is bullcrap.

I believe there were 2 planes, although whether they were the planes stated or not, I am unable to decide. But there is something going on with the coverage. Somebody is lying somewhere. I can't figure out the "why" of it but in light of the Bush administration's actions in most things, it would not surprise me to discover they are covering butt. Perhaps it was foreknowledge. Perhaps something else. Who knows why they do what they do? It's piled so deep and high around Bush that it's tough to get a glance at the truth.

Logic, there is no way to convince folks. "He convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still." Can't recall who said it, but it's been a staple in my "Ain't It The Truth" book. People (me included) really don't want to believe that the leaders of such a powerful nation are inept and dishonest. It scares the crap outta me living next door! Kinda like living next door to a pit of cobras. Easier to pretend they're garter snakes if you want to sleep at night.

 

[lone wolf]

Something stunk about 911 right from the beginning. While even the emergency response teams are going WTF, street level "experts" already had it clear why the towers collapsed. The real experts are still at losses to understand, much less explain - and only a small percentage of the debris is on hand for examination. Explosive demolition? Structural failure due to fire? What little evidence remains is decaying with time.

Official story says the planes were hijacked, then flown to their targets - except for 93 - by the terrorists. If they were experienced pilots and knew how to reprogram the plane's guidance system (can't see landmarks, can't navigate VFR) I could believe. That final mile to the Pentagon? Unbelievable! Allegedly, every one of these guys washed out of primary flight school. Remote control? Flight school ineptness was a ruse? The terrorists were not actually who we are led to believe?

Could cell phones of the day actually reach a tower seven miles down and God knows how far away on the ground? Even so, at 350+ MPH, transition from tower to tower would have made it nearly impossible to maintain a connection. Even so, we are expected to believe 19 clear calls of over a minute in duration were made. Wreckage? Fire on the ground? The "earthquake bomb" theory (when a plane nose-dives in, everything follows the path of fall straight down the hole then is buried as the hole collapses) makes sense - if one can actually detect metal under the surface. Shanksville? Nothing.

Holograms, Cloaking devices? To my mind, they're too way out there to consider anything but Star Trek. Buck Rogers was the same thing to my Dad. The truth is something real. How political? How money-oriented? Those behind it won't say peep - for now.

Wolf

 

[Cosmo]

I agree, Wolf. It's not something unrealistic but there is some credibility issues for sure.

 

[DaSleeper]

Conspiracy theories make entertaining movies and even documentaries......it even makes for good forum fodder..... do I believe in it?.....Naah!!.....

Do I believe the Bush administration responsible as some folks do.....not at all....but they have used it to score political points and to invade Iraq and it backfired.

 

[lone wolf]

I think Dubya and his people were just as duped by the "terrorist attack" as they were by information about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The question is who is really behind it all?

Wolf