What's a semite?
The term Semite refers broadly to speakers of a language group which includes both Arabs and Jews.
What's a semite?
The USA doesn't care what the rest of the world thinks.
I don't run my life based on what people think of me.
And FYI Afghanistan is having success there.
Iran is a rogue force, wants to exterminate the Jews and Americans.
They cannot and by the world force will not get nuclear bombs.
They are showing to much defiance, and if they don't surrender the Brit. troops, it will go to war.
what iran did in the last 20 years?
They did beat a Canadian reporter to death for taking pictures of a prison and then lied about what really happened for months, claiming she died of a stroke.
http://www.scrappleface.com/?p=2543Iran announced today that it would release immediately the 15 British soldiers and marines it took hostage last week to avoid further “cordial pressure and devastating pleasantries” from British Prime Minister Tony Blair. “In this test of wills,” said Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, “we acknowledge the superior power of the adversary. We cannot withstand another onslaught of polite diplomatic language nor the withering, if unspoken, consternation we detect in the eyes of Tony Blair.”
:smile:
Were there injuries and other deaths also in that student protest? I originally thought she was taken into custody for taking photo's of the prison itself.
not necessarily correctly. Listen to me, i'm giving you a conspiracy theory. you like those
Herm, I believe you've made a funny. It's not as apparent as you would like to believe which of us is more inclined to believe common conspiracy theorys, for instance the popularly mislabled 9/11 conspiracy theory of building destructions. The official story dosn't hold water in so many ways, particularly the physics is not supported in any way by that official story. Like many people you are not approaching the subject with the scientific detachment necessary to arrive at any objective conclusions. Even the obvious video evidence clearly indicates that the aircraft that struck the towers were not the same make or model of aircraft reportedly hijacked. No collapse of similar buildings has ever happened, and no building (wtc7) has ever collapsed in sympathy. If you examine just the coincidental evidence of that day you have a seris of miraculous events that simply could not have occured. In conclusion it's clearly not me that has a problem with conspiracy theories.You are not alone in being unable to objectively examine the evidence.:smile:
You do know that they had 'strayed' into Iranian waters right?
wrong
You seem to have left this part out in your post. Even when apprehended in another countries waters the British 'insisted on their immediate release'. They were in Iran illegally.
they were in Iraqi waters, no business of Iran
The British weren't even in Iran. They were in Iraq - under a UN resolution.
The Iranians broke the law by stealing foreign troops from a foreign country.
I am not surprised, another lame try at an excuse for an attack on Iran.
#You havent learned nothing from iraq war?
and on top of it, you are telling them they are idiot, that is very funny.
I have been reading through the Guardian and have not come across any editorials calling for a war against Iran.
That's doesn't surprise me about the Left-Wing Guardian.
The Guardian is so Left-Wing, anti-war, anti-white male, politically correct, pro-Islamlofascist , pro-Sharia Law, pro-Irish Republican that in Britain anyone who appears to be a Left-Wing, liberal, soppy, politically correct person is automatically labelled a "Guardianista."
A Guardianista is a Left-Wing, hand-wringing liberal who worries about melting polar ice-caps who wears T-shirts saying "Save The Vegetarian Whales From Global Warming" whilst reading the Guardian or Independent which are both made of recycled paper whilst listening to a BBC reports about the "benefits" of the EU whilst drinking coffee made from environmentally-friendly beans in a cup made of splinter-free sustainable wood and who eats tofu.
There are quite a few Guardianistas on this thread.
The British weren't even in Iran. They were in Iraq - under a UN resolution.
The Iranians broke the law by stealing foreign troops from a foreign country.
Since nobody has provided any maps, like the course the freighter in question was on. Have you even heard if it was entering or leaving the area, to/from which port? If it wasn't headed to Iraq how would any UN resolution concerning smuggling into Iraq affect if the ship could be stopped and searched. Stolen cars would seem to be a matter for the port authorities when a ship is unloaded.
What rules are in place that dictates which ships can be boarded, being as (the UK) is acting for the Government of Iraq, and not as an UN agent for smuggling in the whole area? One UN document would have more specifics on that particular aspect. I don't have a copy of that. An article that deals with this a bit is at the link below.
http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-20/0703262243164630.htm
"Iran's arrest of sailors was legitimate, says former UK envoy
London, March 26, IRNA
UK Sailors-Iran Arrests
Former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray Monday supported Iran's decision to arrest 15 UK marines in the Persian Gulf last week."
And you are tryping to make me believe we should blindly believe the British! A government that was too stupid to think for themselves and joined in an unjustiied war in Iraq! Didn't the British secret service supply some false information to Bush and his gang that helped in the start of the war?Was it not Iran who started the whole thing by illegally taking British sailors?
What do you expect the British to do? Stand back and do nothing as Canada would in this situation?