Hamas attacks Israel

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,617
3,688
113
Netanyahu submits request for a pardon during his ongoing corruption trial
The president's office called it an "extraordinary request," carrying with it "significant implications."

Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Sam Mednick
Published Nov 30, 2025 • Last updated 14 hours ago • 4 minute read

Israel Politics
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses lawmakers in the Knesset, Israel's parliament, in Jerusalem, Monday, Nov. 10 2025.
TEL AVIV (AP) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday asked the country’s president to grant him a pardon from corruption charges, seeking to end a long-running trial that has bitterly divided the nation.


Netanyahu, who has been at war against Israel’s legal system over the charges, said the request would help unify the country at a time of momentous change in the region. But it immediately triggered denunciations from opponents, who said a pardon would weaken democratic institutions and send a dangerous message that he’s above the rule of law.


Netanyahu had submitted a request for a pardon to the legal department of the Office of the President, the prime minister’s office said in a statement. The president’s office called it an “extraordinary request,” carrying with it “significant implications.”

Netanyahu is the only sitting prime minister in Israeli history to stand trial, after being charged with fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in three separate cases accusing him of exchanging favors with wealthy political supporters. He hasn’t been convicted of anything.


Netanyahu rejects the allegations and has described the case as a witch hunt orchestrated by the media, police and judiciary.

Trump’s request

His request comes weeks after U.S. President Donald Trump publicly urged Israel to pardon Netanyahu, turning to President Isaac Herzog during his speech to Israel’s parliament last month. Earlier this month, Trump also sent a letter to Herzog calling the corruption case “political, unjustified prosecution.”

Herzog is a former political rival of Netanyahu, but the men have a good working relationship. Later Sunday, Israeli media reported a small protest outside Herzog’s home, including a pile of bananas with a sign saying a pardon equals a banana republic.

In a videotaped statement, Netanyahu said the trial has divided the country. He also said the requirement that he appear in court three times a week is a distraction that makes it difficult for him to lead.


“The continuation of the trial tears us apart from within, stirs up this division, and deepens rifts. I am sure, like many others in the nation, that an immediate conclusion of the trial would greatly help to lower the flames and promote the broad reconciliation that our country so desperately needs,” he said.


Case delays
Netanyahu has taken the stand multiple times over the past year. But the case has been repeatedly delayed as he has dealt with wars and unrest stemming from the Hamas-led militant attacks on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

Netanyahu’s pardon request consisted of two documents: a detailed letter signed by his lawyer and a letter signed by Netanyahu. They’ll be sent to the Justice Ministry for opinions and will then be transferred to the legal adviser at the president’s office, which will formulate additional opinions for the president.


Legal experts say the pardon request isn’t able to stop the trial.

“It’s impossible,” said Emi Palmor, former director-general of the Justice Ministry.

“You cannot claim that you’re innocent while the trial is going on and come to the president and ask him to intervene,” she said. The only way to stop the trial is to ask the attorney general to withhold the proceedings, she said.

In rare cases, the system could pardon Netanyahu. Experts say the president has broad discretion to grant one, and oversight is limited.

However, “as a rule, the president reviews a pardon request only after all legal proceedings have ended. The possibility of a preconviction pardon … is extremely rare,” the Israel Democracy Institute wrote earlier this month. “A pardon before conviction, while legal proceedings are ongoing, threatens the rule of law and seriously undermines the principle of equality before the law.”


Netanyahu portrays himself as victim
In 2008, as opposition leader, Netanyahu called on then Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to step down as he faced a growing corruption scandal. At the time, Netanyahu said that a prime minister “up to his neck” in scandal did not have a mandate to lead the country, and there was a risk that Olmert would make decisions that served his personal interests and not those of the nation.

Olmert resigned even before he was indicted that year and would later serve 16 months in prison.

Netanyahu has struck a different, defiant tone since his own legal problems began. He has portrayed himself as the victim of a “deep state” conspiracy trying to oust him from office.

Shortly after forming his current government in late 2022, Netanyahu launched a plan to overhaul Israel’s justice system.


Netanyahu presented the plan as a much-needed reform. But his opponents accused him of trying to weaken the justice system, damaging the country’s system of checks and balances and having a conflict of interest at a time when he was on trial.

The plan triggered large street protests against the government, and critics have said the deep divisions sent a message of weakness to Israel’s enemies that encouraged Hamas to launch its 2023 attacks.

Netanyahu’s request also sparked backlash on Sunday, with an immediate response from the opposition and advocacy groups urging the president not to give in to his request.

“You cannot grant him a pardon without an admission of guilt, an expression of remorse and an immediate retirement from political life,” opposition leader Yair Lapid said.


The Movement for Quality Government in Israel said that granting a pardon to a prime minister accused of serious offenses of fraud and breach of trust would send a clear message that there are citizens who are above the law.

But some Israelis expressed support for Netanyahu’s request.

“Bibi Netanyahu did totally the right thing requesting the pardon,“ said Lior Gal, a Jerusalem resident, referring to the prime minister by his nickname. ”He deserves to be pardoned. This chapter should be over and to remain united people and carry on.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,617
3,688
113
Prime Minister Mark Carney's jet charter to attend Gaza peace treaty cost $736Gs
Due to the last-minute decision to attend the summit, no RCAF aircraft were available to ferry PM to Egypt

Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Dec 11, 2025 • Last updated 5 hours ago • 3 minute read

Prime Minister Mark Carney
Prime Minister Mark Carney leaves a bilateral meeting with Qatar's Amir on the sideline of Sharm El-Sheikh Peace Summit, in the Egyptian Red Sea resort town of Sharm el-Sheikh, on October 13, 2025. (Photo by YOAN VALAT/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
OTTAWA — Chartering a last-minute private jet so Prime Minister Mark Carney could attend October’s signing of the Gaza peace plan cost taxpayers $736,466.11.


That’s according to the response to an order paper question filed by Conservative MP Larry Brock seeking costs of the Oct. 13 trip.


When news of the trip first broke, the Prime Minister’s Office told reporters a private jet was chartered to attend the signing in the Egyptian resort city of Sharm El Sheikh because no Canadian Forces planes were available.

“With the summit being planned by the United States on an urgent timeline and invitations from the president being made so close to departure, overlapping existing operational needs resulted in the option of a Canadian Armed Forces airbus flight and related crews being unavailable for this transport,” the PMO said in a statement.

RCAF crew was available, aircraft wasn’t
According to the Department of National Defence, a crew from 412 Transport Squadron — the RCAF unit responsible for operating the government’s fleet of CC-144 Challenger business jets — was indeed available for the trip, but an aircraft was not.


“In this case, most crews were already committed, and while a Challenger crew was available, the aircraft could not meet the itinerary requirements,” the response read.

“There were also not enough crews for the larger Airbus aircraft because they were assigned to other missions, training, or rest.”

According to the RCAF website, 412 Squadron — a unit of 8 Wing Trenton based at Ottawa International Airport — “maintains a 12-hour notice-to-move posture 365 days a year in support of Government of Canada and Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) global transportation requirements.”

Using a Challenger for the same journey would have cost $198,800, based on an hourly operating cost of $7,100 and a one-way flight time of 14 hours.


Decision to attend was same day
According to the response, the trip was indeed made at the last minute.

“The decision made to attend was made at 8:30 a.m. on October 12, 2025, subject to various checks and confirmations throughout the day,” the response read.

The aircraft departed Ottawa International Airport at 6:45 p.m. on Oct. 12, landing in Sharm El Sheikh International Airport a little over 10 hours later.

A full itemized breakdown of costs was not included in the response, but it did say the PMO chartered a Bombardier Global 5000 from Toronto-based Chartright Air Group.


About the aircraft and flight
Chartright offers two Global 5000s for charter — one based in Toronto, and the other splitting its time between Regina and Scottsdale, Arizona.

Both aircraft are listed on the FAA’s Limiting Aircraft Data Displayed (LADD) database, which prevents them from being tracked by commercially-available flight trackers.

According to the documents, flight time from Ottawa to Sharm El Sheikh was 10 hours and six minutes, with the return flight taking 11 hours with one refuelling stop.

Chartright’s Toronto-based plane can fly 5,550 nautical miles (10,280 km) — capable of flying from Ottawa to Sharm El Sheikh without refuelling, but the documents indicate the return flight required at least one stop for fuel.


Costs and quantity of fuel for the trip was not provided in the response.

carney trump
US President Donald Trump greets Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney during a summit on Gaza in Sharm el-Sheikh on October 13, 2025. (Photo by Evan Vucci / POOL / AFP) Photo by EVAN VUCCI /POOL/AFP via Getty Images
According to Chartright’s website, the plane can hold 12 passengers, has two lavatories, a “comprehensive entertainment system” and can sleep seven passengers.

Passengers on the flight included Carney’s chief-of-staff Marc-Andre Blanchard, policy advisor Scott Gilmore, Global Affairs Director Lisa Jorgensen, Carney’s official photographer Daniel Pereira, and PMO staffers Emily Grant and Kaitlin Power.

Passengers dined on “American breakfast and flavoured yogurt, caprese salad and Italian chicken,” according to the documents.

Canada was one of 30 nations and international organizations represented at the US-brokered treaty signing, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian PM Giorgia Meloni and UK PM Keir Starmer.

Representatives from Palestinian terror group Hamas did not attend the meeting, nor did any Israeli officials — despite early indiciations from Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu that he’d planned to attend.

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
X: @bryanpassifiume
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,345
14,668
113
Low Earth Orbit
Prime Minister Mark Carney's jet charter to attend Gaza peace treaty cost $736Gs
Due to the last-minute decision to attend the summit, no RCAF aircraft were available to ferry PM to Egypt

Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Dec 11, 2025 • Last updated 5 hours ago • 3 minute read

Prime Minister Mark Carney
Prime Minister Mark Carney leaves a bilateral meeting with Qatar's Amir on the sideline of Sharm El-Sheikh Peace Summit, in the Egyptian Red Sea resort town of Sharm el-Sheikh, on October 13, 2025. (Photo by YOAN VALAT/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
OTTAWA — Chartering a last-minute private jet so Prime Minister Mark Carney could attend October’s signing of the Gaza peace plan cost taxpayers $736,466.11.


That’s according to the response to an order paper question filed by Conservative MP Larry Brock seeking costs of the Oct. 13 trip.


When news of the trip first broke, the Prime Minister’s Office told reporters a private jet was chartered to attend the signing in the Egyptian resort city of Sharm El Sheikh because no Canadian Forces planes were available.

“With the summit being planned by the United States on an urgent timeline and invitations from the president being made so close to departure, overlapping existing operational needs resulted in the option of a Canadian Armed Forces airbus flight and related crews being unavailable for this transport,” the PMO said in a statement.

RCAF crew was available, aircraft wasn’t
According to the Department of National Defence, a crew from 412 Transport Squadron — the RCAF unit responsible for operating the government’s fleet of CC-144 Challenger business jets — was indeed available for the trip, but an aircraft was not.


“In this case, most crews were already committed, and while a Challenger crew was available, the aircraft could not meet the itinerary requirements,” the response read.

“There were also not enough crews for the larger Airbus aircraft because they were assigned to other missions, training, or rest.”

According to the RCAF website, 412 Squadron — a unit of 8 Wing Trenton based at Ottawa International Airport — “maintains a 12-hour notice-to-move posture 365 days a year in support of Government of Canada and Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) global transportation requirements.”

Using a Challenger for the same journey would have cost $198,800, based on an hourly operating cost of $7,100 and a one-way flight time of 14 hours.


Decision to attend was same day
According to the response, the trip was indeed made at the last minute.

“The decision made to attend was made at 8:30 a.m. on October 12, 2025, subject to various checks and confirmations throughout the day,” the response read.

The aircraft departed Ottawa International Airport at 6:45 p.m. on Oct. 12, landing in Sharm El Sheikh International Airport a little over 10 hours later.

A full itemized breakdown of costs was not included in the response, but it did say the PMO chartered a Bombardier Global 5000 from Toronto-based Chartright Air Group.


About the aircraft and flight
Chartright offers two Global 5000s for charter — one based in Toronto, and the other splitting its time between Regina and Scottsdale, Arizona.

Both aircraft are listed on the FAA’s Limiting Aircraft Data Displayed (LADD) database, which prevents them from being tracked by commercially-available flight trackers.

According to the documents, flight time from Ottawa to Sharm El Sheikh was 10 hours and six minutes, with the return flight taking 11 hours with one refuelling stop.

Chartright’s Toronto-based plane can fly 5,550 nautical miles (10,280 km) — capable of flying from Ottawa to Sharm El Sheikh without refuelling, but the documents indicate the return flight required at least one stop for fuel.


Costs and quantity of fuel for the trip was not provided in the response.

carney trump
US President Donald Trump greets Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney during a summit on Gaza in Sharm el-Sheikh on October 13, 2025. (Photo by Evan Vucci / POOL / AFP) Photo by EVAN VUCCI /POOL/AFP via Getty Images
According to Chartright’s website, the plane can hold 12 passengers, has two lavatories, a “comprehensive entertainment system” and can sleep seven passengers.

Passengers on the flight included Carney’s chief-of-staff Marc-Andre Blanchard, policy advisor Scott Gilmore, Global Affairs Director Lisa Jorgensen, Carney’s official photographer Daniel Pereira, and PMO staffers Emily Grant and Kaitlin Power.

Passengers dined on “American breakfast and flavoured yogurt, caprese salad and Italian chicken,” according to the documents.

Canada was one of 30 nations and international organizations represented at the US-brokered treaty signing, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian PM Giorgia Meloni and UK PM Keir Starmer.

Representatives from Palestinian terror group Hamas did not attend the meeting, nor did any Israeli officials — despite early indiciations from Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu that he’d planned to attend.

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
X: @bryanpassifiume
They just sold off the Challenger fleet if memory abides.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,345
14,668
113
Low Earth Orbit
Netanyahu submits request for a pardon during his ongoing corruption trial
The president's office called it an "extraordinary request," carrying with it "significant implications."

Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Sam Mednick
Published Nov 30, 2025 • Last updated 14 hours ago • 4 minute read

Israel Politics
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses lawmakers in the Knesset, Israel's parliament, in Jerusalem, Monday, Nov. 10 2025.
TEL AVIV (AP) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday asked the country’s president to grant him a pardon from corruption charges, seeking to end a long-running trial that has bitterly divided the nation.


Netanyahu, who has been at war against Israel’s legal system over the charges, said the request would help unify the country at a time of momentous change in the region. But it immediately triggered denunciations from opponents, who said a pardon would weaken democratic institutions and send a dangerous message that he’s above the rule of law.


Netanyahu had submitted a request for a pardon to the legal department of the Office of the President, the prime minister’s office said in a statement. The president’s office called it an “extraordinary request,” carrying with it “significant implications.”

Netanyahu is the only sitting prime minister in Israeli history to stand trial, after being charged with fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in three separate cases accusing him of exchanging favors with wealthy political supporters. He hasn’t been convicted of anything.


Netanyahu rejects the allegations and has described the case as a witch hunt orchestrated by the media, police and judiciary.

Trump’s request

His request comes weeks after U.S. President Donald Trump publicly urged Israel to pardon Netanyahu, turning to President Isaac Herzog during his speech to Israel’s parliament last month. Earlier this month, Trump also sent a letter to Herzog calling the corruption case “political, unjustified prosecution.”

Herzog is a former political rival of Netanyahu, but the men have a good working relationship. Later Sunday, Israeli media reported a small protest outside Herzog’s home, including a pile of bananas with a sign saying a pardon equals a banana republic.

In a videotaped statement, Netanyahu said the trial has divided the country. He also said the requirement that he appear in court three times a week is a distraction that makes it difficult for him to lead.


“The continuation of the trial tears us apart from within, stirs up this division, and deepens rifts. I am sure, like many others in the nation, that an immediate conclusion of the trial would greatly help to lower the flames and promote the broad reconciliation that our country so desperately needs,” he said.


Case delays
Netanyahu has taken the stand multiple times over the past year. But the case has been repeatedly delayed as he has dealt with wars and unrest stemming from the Hamas-led militant attacks on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

Netanyahu’s pardon request consisted of two documents: a detailed letter signed by his lawyer and a letter signed by Netanyahu. They’ll be sent to the Justice Ministry for opinions and will then be transferred to the legal adviser at the president’s office, which will formulate additional opinions for the president.


Legal experts say the pardon request isn’t able to stop the trial.

“It’s impossible,” said Emi Palmor, former director-general of the Justice Ministry.

“You cannot claim that you’re innocent while the trial is going on and come to the president and ask him to intervene,” she said. The only way to stop the trial is to ask the attorney general to withhold the proceedings, she said.

In rare cases, the system could pardon Netanyahu. Experts say the president has broad discretion to grant one, and oversight is limited.

However, “as a rule, the president reviews a pardon request only after all legal proceedings have ended. The possibility of a preconviction pardon … is extremely rare,” the Israel Democracy Institute wrote earlier this month. “A pardon before conviction, while legal proceedings are ongoing, threatens the rule of law and seriously undermines the principle of equality before the law.”


Netanyahu portrays himself as victim
In 2008, as opposition leader, Netanyahu called on then Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to step down as he faced a growing corruption scandal. At the time, Netanyahu said that a prime minister “up to his neck” in scandal did not have a mandate to lead the country, and there was a risk that Olmert would make decisions that served his personal interests and not those of the nation.

Olmert resigned even before he was indicted that year and would later serve 16 months in prison.

Netanyahu has struck a different, defiant tone since his own legal problems began. He has portrayed himself as the victim of a “deep state” conspiracy trying to oust him from office.

Shortly after forming his current government in late 2022, Netanyahu launched a plan to overhaul Israel’s justice system.


Netanyahu presented the plan as a much-needed reform. But his opponents accused him of trying to weaken the justice system, damaging the country’s system of checks and balances and having a conflict of interest at a time when he was on trial.

The plan triggered large street protests against the government, and critics have said the deep divisions sent a message of weakness to Israel’s enemies that encouraged Hamas to launch its 2023 attacks.

Netanyahu’s request also sparked backlash on Sunday, with an immediate response from the opposition and advocacy groups urging the president not to give in to his request.

“You cannot grant him a pardon without an admission of guilt, an expression of remorse and an immediate retirement from political life,” opposition leader Yair Lapid said.


The Movement for Quality Government in Israel said that granting a pardon to a prime minister accused of serious offenses of fraud and breach of trust would send a clear message that there are citizens who are above the law.

But some Israelis expressed support for Netanyahu’s request.

“Bibi Netanyahu did totally the right thing requesting the pardon,“ said Lior Gal, a Jerusalem resident, referring to the prime minister by his nickname. ”He deserves to be pardoned. This chapter should be over and to remain united people and carry on.”
And fighting a public inquiry on Oct 7. Why?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,345
14,668
113
Low Earth Orbit
And fighting a public inquiry on Oct 7. Why?
ISRAEL: A committee of Israeli ministers has approved a bill that would give PM Netanyahu's government influence over the composition and mandate of a commission of inquiry into the events of October 7, 2023. The bill is now set to head to a Knesset vote on Wednesday.

Sources told Haaretz that Netanyahu said at the meeting that the government-controlled committee will investigate the 1993-1995 Oslo Accords and reservists' protests against his coalition's attempted judicial coup in 2023.

Attorney General Gali Baharav Miara said that the bill "prioritizes political considerations over the principles of an independent, impartial, and professional investigation" and is "riddled with fundamental flaws."

The "October Council," a group representing the bereaved families of October 7, protested outside Netanyahu's office against the proposal, saying that "the government of omission and cover-up must be investigated only by an impartial state commission of inquiry," adding that "any other commission is intended to throw sand in the public's eyes."

"The government doesn't intend to form a state commission of inquiry, whose members are appointed by the Supreme Court president, because it isn't interested in determining the truth, but in whitewashing it.

The opposition has rightly announced that it has no intention of cooperating with this. No legitimacy should be granted to a farce in which the people being investigated appoint their own investigators and also set limits on the investigation into their failure" – Haaretz Editorial


What does Bibi have to hide?
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,617
3,688
113
Ex-aide says Netanyahu tasked him with making a plan to evade responsibility for Oct. 7 attack
Speaking to Kan, Feldstein said "the first task" he received from Netanyahu after Oct. 7, 2023, was to stifle calls for accountability

Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Julia Frankel
Published Dec 23, 2025 • 2 minute read

JERUSALEM (AP) — A former close aide to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says that immediately following the October 2023 Hamas attack that triggered Israel’s two-year war in Gaza, the Israeli leader instructed him to figure out how the premier could evade responsibility for the security breach.


Former Netanyahu spokesperson Eli Feldstein, who faces trial for allegedly leaking classified information to the press, made the explosive accusation during an extensive interview with Israel’s Kan news channel Monday night.


Critics have repeatedly accused Netanyahu of refusing to accept blame for the deadliest attack in Israel’s history. But little is known about Netanyahu’s behaviour in the days immediately following the attack, while the premier has consistently resisted an independent state inquiry.

Speaking to Kan, Feldstein said “the first task” he received from Netanyahu after Oct. 7, 2023, was to stifle calls for accountability.

“He asked me, ‘What are they talking about in the news? Are they still talking about responsibility?”‘ Feldstein said. “He wanted me to think of something that could be said that would offset the media storm surrounding the question of whether the prime minister had taken responsibility or not.”


He added that Netanyahu looked “panicked” when he made the request. Feldstein said he was later told by people in Netanyahu’s close circle to omit the word “responsibility” from all statements.

On Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people in southern Israel and took 251 hostages back to Gaza. Israel then launched a devastating war in Gaza that has killed nearly 71,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not differentiate between civilians and combatants but says around half the deaths were women and children.

Netanyahu’s office called the interview a “long series of mendacious and recycled allegations made by a man with clear personal interests who is trying to deflect responsibility from himself,” Hebrew media reported.

Feldstein’s statements come after his indictment in a case where he is accused of leaking classified military information to a German tabloid to improve public perception of the prime minister following the killing of six hostages in Gaza in August of last year.

Feldstein is also a suspect in the “Qatargate” scandal, one of two close aides to Netanyahu accused of accepting money from Qatar while also working for the prime minister.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,345
14,668
113
Low Earth Orbit
We're only defending ourselves, there is no Greater Israel
■ GAZA: Israel will allow Jewish settlers to live in northern Gaza at some point in the future, Defense Minister Israel Katz said, a claim he previously made and then retracted on Tuesday. Speaking at a conference hosted by the religious Zionist newspaper Makor Rishon, Katz vowed that Israeli forces would never fully retreat from all of Gaza, and rejected that he had backtracked.​
  • At least one person was killed in Israeli strikes across the Strip, Palestinian media outlets reported.

■ WEST BANK: Defense Minister Katz said at the Makor Rishon conference that Israel is "implementing a policy of de facto sovereignty" in the West Bank. "It is impossible now, due to the circumstances, to declare annexation. Practical annexation means ... [evacuating] the Palestinians from the terror camps and stationing the IDF there, and establishing settlements."​
  • An eight-month-old Palestinian baby suffered a moderate head wound after settlers threw a stone at her home near Hebron on Tuesday night, local media reported. On Thursday, Israel Police said they arrested five settlers on suspicion of involvement in "extremist violence."

  • An IDF reservist in civilian clothing was filmed running over a Palestinian man praying on the side of the road with an ATV in the village of Deir Jarir, northeast of Ramallah.

  • Settlers threw rocks and opened fire at Palestinians near Ramallah, Palestinian media reported, saying that the violence began after Palestinians had shepherded their flock at the village's edge. Separately, settlers set fire to Palestinian workers' equipment at a quarry near Bethlehem and spray-painted threatening messages and a Star of David there.

  • Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said that "foreign governments will not restrict the right of Jews to live in the Land of Israel," after several countries – including the U.K., Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Spain – condemned Israel's decision to approve 19 new settlements earlier this week.

  • The IDF said that soldiers detained four Palestinians overnight who were planning a terror attack, and three who threw rocks at passing cars.

  • After reviewing classified materials, Israel's High Court of Justice rejected a petition against the IDF's planned demolition of 25 residential buildings in the Nur al-Shams refugee camp. The justices ruled the action was based on "a clear and urgent military necessity," citing the presence of "extensive terrorist infrastructure" in the camp.

"What is brewing in the West Bank these days is not just another 'spat of clashes,' nor some seasonal event having to do with the autumn olive harvest season, nor some local outburst of violence that can be contained or framed as a local problem. This is a different, much more dangerous reality: one that derives from policy. This policy is clear and ongoing. It is intended to change facts on the ground, so that West Bank annexation does not remain some political statement about the future, but becomes daily action grounded in the present" – Jack Khoury
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
30,728
11,238
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Following a one-hour phone call in July with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, Carney (yeah, our Carney) declared that we would have peace in our time, with Abbas at the helm of a Palestinian state. What Carney seems to disregard is that Abbas, currently in his 20th year of a four-year election mandate, has virtually no legitimacy in the eyes of Palestinians, and is regarded as a corrupt, old demagogue.
Hamas is planning to hold “internal” elections to choose its new political bureau head, Saudi Arabia-based outlet Asharq News reported on Saturday.

The election, which was originally set to be held in early 2025, was ordered by a leadership council that was established after the deaths of Hamas’s previous political bureau heads, Ismail Haniyeh and the mastermind behind Hamas's October 7 massacre, Yahya Sinwar.

Asharq reported that the decision to hold the election, which will result in the dissolution of the leadership council, was forced by “the appearance of contradictory opinions among the members of the council” regarding Hamas’s future in Gaza and ties with regional allies.

The Hamas Shura Council, made up of approximately 50 terrorists representing the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and global Hamas operations, has begun preparations for the election, Asharq reported, adding that the vote will occur within the next few days or weeks.
The declaration states: “In the context of the end of the war in Gaza, Hamas must cease exercising its authority over the Gaza Strip and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with the support and cooperation of the international community, in accordance with the objective of a sovereign and independent State of Palestine.”
The two leading candidates for the position are Hamas chief negotiator Khalil al-Hayya and Khaled Mashaal. According to Asharq, Hayya is expected to win due to his popularity in the Gaza Strip and involvement in Hamas operations in the West Bank.
It also mentions (?) the deployment of a “temporary international stabilisation mission” under a mandate from the UN security council to protect the population, support the strengthening of the capacities of the Palestinian state and provide “security guarantees to Palestine and Israel”.
Hayya’s platform is based on maintaining the current status quo of Hamas strategy, which includes “armed confrontation with Israel in the Gaza Strip, until the war ends, and the Israeli army completely withdraws from the Strip,” Asharq stated.

In contrast, Meshaal reportedly leans towards a path based on trying to distance Hamas from Iranian influence, strengthening ties to moderate Arab nations, and continued participation in ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Gaza.
Hamas may have suffered severe military setbacks, yet it has accumulated something far more potent: a narrative capable of shaping international perceptions, polarizing public discourse, and fueling a new wave of antisemitism around the world.

Militarily, the trajectory of the war is grim but predictable: Israel will likely succeed in dismantling much of Hamas’s physical infrastructure. The confrontation is a clear one: a professional army facing armed groups deeply embedded beneath hospitals, schools, and residential neighborhoods. It is a war Israel can win, albeit at immense human cost.
The human shields is bullshit. Enough stupidity already.
For decades, Hamas has understood something essential about modern conflict: wars are no longer decided solely by military strength but by global perception. And it prepared meticulously for that front.

Its leaders invested heavily in shaping coverage from Gaza – restricting journalists’ access, imposing conditions on reporting, choreographing scenes of devastation, and ensuring that the images reaching the world aligned with its political goals.
UN is going to put peacekeeping forces into West Bank and Gaza aka the State of Palestine.
Can’t wait. It’ll be an interesting show. Israel focused on destroying tunnels and conducting urban operations designed to minimize civilian casualties – efforts acknowledged by military experts but seldom reflected in mainstream coverage – Hamas pursued another objective: embedding in global discourse the gravest moral accusation available, that Israel is committing genocide. It is a potent narrative, one that is emotionally compelling despite the lack of legal or historical grounding. And it is proving remarkably effective.

What is at stake is not simply Israel’s reputation; it is the integrity of how we understand violence, responsibility, and history itself. A world that cannot distinguish between a democracy defending its citizens and a terrorist organization hiding behind its own civilians is a world that has surrendered its moral compass.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,345
14,668
113
Low Earth Orbit
Hamas is planning to hold “internal” elections to choose its new political bureau head, Saudi Arabia-based outlet Asharq News reported on Saturday.

The election, which was originally set to be held in early 2025, was ordered by a leadership council that was established after the deaths of Hamas’s previous political bureau heads, Ismail Haniyeh and the mastermind behind Hamas's October 7 massacre, Yahya Sinwar.

Asharq reported that the decision to hold the election, which will result in the dissolution of the leadership council, was forced by “the appearance of contradictory opinions among the members of the council” regarding Hamas’s future in Gaza and ties with regional allies.

The Hamas Shura Council, made up of approximately 50 terrorists representing the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and global Hamas operations, has begun preparations for the election, Asharq reported, adding that the vote will occur within the next few days or weeks.

The two leading candidates for the position are Hamas chief negotiator Khalil al-Hayya and Khaled Mashaal. According to Asharq, Hayya is expected to win due to his popularity in the Gaza Strip and involvement in Hamas operations in the West Bank.

Hayya’s platform is based on maintaining the current status quo of Hamas strategy, which includes “armed confrontation with Israel in the Gaza Strip, until the war ends, and the Israeli army completely withdraws from the Strip,” Asharq stated.

In contrast, Meshaal reportedly leans towards a path based on trying to distance Hamas from Iranian influence, strengthening ties to moderate Arab nations, and continued participation in ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Gaza.
Hamas may have suffered severe military setbacks, yet it has accumulated something far more potent: a narrative capable of shaping international perceptions, polarizing public discourse, and fueling a new wave of antisemitism around the world.

Militarily, the trajectory of the war is grim but predictable: Israel will likely succeed in dismantling much of Hamas’s physical infrastructure. The confrontation is a clear one: a professional army facing armed groups deeply embedded beneath hospitals, schools, and residential neighborhoods. It is a war Israel can win, albeit at immense human cost.

For decades, Hamas has understood something essential about modern conflict: wars are no longer decided solely by military strength but by global perception. And it prepared meticulously for that front.

Its leaders invested heavily in shaping coverage from Gaza – restricting journalists’ access, imposing conditions on reporting, choreographing scenes of devastation, and ensuring that the images reaching the world aligned with its political goals.

Can’t wait. It’ll be an interesting show. Israel focused on destroying tunnels and conducting urban operations designed to minimize civilian casualties – efforts acknowledged by military experts but seldom reflected in mainstream coverage – Hamas pursued another objective: embedding in global discourse the gravest moral accusation available, that Israel is committing genocide. It is a potent narrative, one that is emotionally compelling despite the lack of legal or historical grounding. And it is proving remarkably effective.

What is at stake is not simply Israel’s reputation; it is the integrity of how we understand violence, responsibility, and history itself. A world that cannot distinguish between a democracy defending its citizens and a terrorist organization hiding behind its own civilians is a world that has surrendered its moral compass.
Israel is Israel's worst enemy. All Hamas had to do was let Israel be Israel. Netanyahu and the Synagogue if Satan is to blame for Israel's reputation not Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran. If you can't see the forest for the Zionist terrorists trees that's on you. Israel let Oct 7 happen if not planned it and the world knows this and so does half of Israel who are pissed off at Bibi and the KKK and then there is the unjustifiable wholesale slaughter of women and children in Gaza and and the terrorism in the West Bank that Hamas fought back over. In the 9 months leading up to Oct 7 500 Palestinians were murdered in the West Bank. Nobody else is to blame for the Greater Israel Project that lead to Hamas attacking. The world sees this and they saw how Israel murdered Israel is on Oct with tank rounds, hellfire missiles and 30mm M230 cannons.

Don't be a dolboyob.