The immigration ministry.How did your government find that many people who have no values other than money to work for them? Are there that many sociopaths running around Canada?
The immigration ministry.How did your government find that many people who have no values other than money to work for them? Are there that many sociopaths running around Canada?
In my estimation there are many that would do the job for all the reasons you list at 1/3 of the remuneration package that is the current standard. Unfortunately those people are not welcomed by the vast majority of the public service who enjoy things the way they are. No one has a better deal and let's keep it that way should be there motto.Just money? Wow. No spouses, children, families, hometowns to whom they feel some loyalty? No personal pride in a job well done, or feeling that it's worth doing?
How did your government find that many people who have no values other than money to work for them? Are there that many sociopaths running around Canada?
You think the entire civil service earns top 1%?In my estimation there are many that would do the job for all the reasons you list at 1/3 of the remuneration package that is the current standard. Unfortunately those people are not welcomed by the vast majority of the public service who enjoy things the way they are. No one has a better deal and let's keep it that way should be there motto.
To answer the second question, sociopaths like to hire other sociopaths and even more so when they are related. That way they all agree to pay themselves more.
What burns me is for them to earn in the top 1% during their working days and then to receive a golden pension above and beyond what regular Canadians get. If they haven't been able to build a nest egg before retiring at that level of income they don' deserve more imo. Paying out six figure pensions to 80 and 90 year old people is a huge waste but good for the banks where it sits.
And on, and on, and on
Our government is totally inept & incompetent. This is disgusting!!View attachment 31986
View attachment 31987
View attachment 31988
Could it be as ‘simple’ as this above?
Top earners where I live are all public employees. Cute that they refer to themselves as servants.You think the entire civil service earns top 1%?
Funny that you think I'd fall for you moving the goalposts from "top earners are civil servants" to "civil servants are top earners."Top earners where I live are all public employees. Cute that they refer to themselves as servants.
Read that again.Funny that you think I'd fall for you moving the goalposts from "top earners are civil servants" to "civil servants are top earners."
Nice try, though.
Yep, based on the obviously untrue "fact" that all civil servants make big bucks.Read that again.
Funny that you think I'd fall for you moving the goalposts from "top earners are civil servants" to "civil servants are top earners."
Nice try, though.
That's too many. We have 2.9 million civilian Federal employees, out of a population of 326 million. Your average compensation tells me the civil service is top-heavy. See my thread on "How to Reduce the Federal Workforce" for how to reduce it without going all Trumpy.
- Overall average: The average annual salary for all full-time Canadian workers in 2023 was less than $70,000, while the average total compensation for a full-time federal employee was $125,300, according to a 2023 report from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
- As of April 1, 2024, the federal public service had 367,772 employees. This number includes employees in the core public service and broader public sector agencies.
Hmmm…U.S. F-35 fighter jets were available to fly only half the time in 2024 due to maintenance shortcomings by Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), a report from the Defense Department's Office of the Inspector General said.The Canadian federal government says a reconsideration of its $19-billion purchase of U.S.-made warplanes is under way, a review that defence analysts warn could antagonize U.S. President Donald Trump as Ottawa and Washington prepare for talks on a new economic and security relationship.
The problem isn't the current US regime. Since we will have these planes for 30+years, there will be around 8 different US presidents effectively controlling our air force. Unless we can reverse engineer much of the planes, we are totally reliant on the whims of US politics to keep the planes in the air.

canadiandefencereview.com
But they last a long time. Since the Canadian air force does not have the budget for fuel or parts, it tends to balance out.Yep, and we picked the F-35 over the F-22 because the 22 was "too expensive."
Nothing more expensive than hangar queens.
Unhinged.Mobilization Plan Charlie calls for creation of volunteer 'Maple Leaf Battalion'
Former NDP Member of Parliament and leadership hopeful has a far-out plan to defend Canada
Author of the article:Robert Smol
Published Jan 03, 2026 • Last updated 1 day ago • 4 minute read
File photo of Canadian Forces.
File photo of Canadian Forces. Photo by FILE PHOTO /POSTMEDIA NETWORK
In recent weeks, I have been both enthralled and perplexed by the over-the-top, literal call-to-arms from former NDP MP Charlie Angus.
As many of us might recall, Angus was once a serious contender for the NDP leadership. He is now a regular contributor on the popular anti-Trump American YouTube Channel Meidas Touch.
As a result, Angus is gaining popularity among impressionable anti-MAGA youth in the United States, many of whom now believe Canada under Carney is preparing to mobilize militarily against Donald Trump and the United States.
From a military planning perspective, such mobilization might seem reasonable, but given our current state of preparedness, it is not realistic.
Especially now that Charlie Angus wants to encourage Canada to raise a new volunteer militia battalion to help protect this nation.
“In reality,” he states on his Substack, “the government is sending a message to Donald Trump.”
“This is about being prepared” Angus further states on his Meidas Touch broadcast to his American and Canadian followers. “This is about being ready for whatever comes.”
He then goes further stating that his proposal for a militia battalion is “sending a message that Canada is not going to be pushed around.”
Charlie Angus(files)
Charlie Angus(files)
Wow!
I never thought one who served in the endemically anti-military, pacifist NDP caucus for years would become such a jingoistic warmonger. At least that is what card-carrying members of the NDP often labelled me simply for suggesting that Canada meet the basic NATO standard for military preparedness.
And let’s not forget that Charlie Angus’ NDP was the party that, at its convention back in 2021, had a resolution on its agenda to abolish, yes, abolish the Canadian Armed Forces.
It is also common knowledge among military historians that the NDP, until some years ago, wanted Canada to withdraw from NATO. Trump would certainly have admired the NDP for that had they been elected and acted on their anti-NATO stance.
It is also well known that the NDP has consistently opposed nearly every attempt, successful or unsuccessful, to re-equip the armed forces over the past few decades.
But for Angus and his followers, that century of pacifist, anti-military, anti-NATO sentiment among the NDP and the left is now just spent marijuana smoke in the earth’s troposphere.
So here is a summary of the key objectives of what I like to call Mobilization Plan Charlie.
“This will be a volunteer army trained in weapons and the use of drones,” the former musician states in his Substack.
His proposed name for this “army” or “battalion” (he mistakenly uses the two terms interchangeably) would be the Maple Leaf Battalion.
Excuse me for a moment, Charlie, but Canada already has a volunteer army trained, as much as the government might allow, in the use of weapons, including drones. This includes dozens of reserve units.
And may I add that many of those reserve units – such as The Royal Montreal Regiment, the Queen’s Own Rifles, The Toronto Scottish, and the Loyal Edmonton Regiment, to name a few – already have the maple leaf showing prominently in their unit badges.
Angus also suggests the “Maple Leaf Battalion” get proper uniforms and access to weapons.” Thanks, Charlie, but that’s obvious.
He also has an original idea for training this new force.
Charlie’s plan: Have the Canadian Rangers train the citizen volunteer army/battalion! Yes, the proposal would be that the vanguard of Canada’s new patriotic war mobilization plan against what he calls “gangster states” would come from the tepidly trained and equipped Canadian Rangers.
As I have reported here and in other media outlets, the Canadian Rangers, contrary to public opinion, are not actual combat soldiers trained to engage in, let alone train others for, tactical combat military operations.
It seems only pacifist resistance is the route for Charlie Angus’ citizen army, the crack Canadian Ranger-trained Maple Leaf Battalion, as they don uniforms and take up their weapons to, I guess, sort of fight.
Excuse me, but this veteran does not feel safer.
Hopefully this reality check will temper the ideological self-pleasuring martial fantasies pushed by Angus, his followers, and other left-wing proponents. Maybe they might be convinced at some point that prudent and systematic military planning is the way to go if we actually want to “be ready.”
Otherwise, impending military and wartime reality will hit us even harder, and all of this flamboyantly unnecessary militia hype will collapse just as fast and hard as a green soldier’s passion for patriotic glory collapses the moment he encounters his first anti-personnel mine within a concentrated kill zone of enemy machine gun fire infused with chlorine gas.
– Smol is a retired military intelligence officer who served in the Canadian Armed Forces for more than 20 years. He is currently completing a PhD in military history. Reach him at rmsmol@gmail.com
![]()
SMOL: Mobilization Plan Charlie calls for creation of volunteer 'Maple Leaf Battalion'
I've recently been both enthralled and perplexed by the over-the-top, literal call-to-arms from former NDP MP Charlie Angus. Read more.torontosun.com
instagram.com
U.S. President Donald Trump’s envoy to Ottawa is warning of consequences to the continental defence pact if Canada does not move forward with the purchase of 88 F-35 fighter jets.While the federal government has already put down its money for the first 16 warplanes, which are due to be delivered early next year, Blair is suggesting that the first F-35s might be accepted and the remainder of the fleet would be made up of aircraft from European suppliers, such as the Swedish-built Saab Gripen, which finished second in the competition.
It is crazy , but the CBC pushes and the sheep eat it up . Elbows up Canada . Hoorah .U.S. President Donald Trump’s envoy to Ottawa is warning of consequences to the continental defence pact if Canada does not move forward with the purchase of 88 F-35 fighter jets.
If the Carney government were to order the Swedish-built Gripen fighter jet, as it is considering, the ambassador says the arrangement with NORAD would still have to be rethought.
Well, at least he’s not threatening NATO?
A former top Canadian national security official described the ambassador’s remarks as "clearly a political pressure tactic to force the Canadian government’s hand." "This is another off-the-cuff remark by the ambassador,” Rigby said. "It can’t be ignored but neither should it be taken as gospel truth from either the administration or the Pentagon."
At least one nation is regretting its purchase of F-35s. Denmark has been embroiled in a dispute with the Trump administration over the president’s push to own Greenland. The small European country even deployed those jets to the Arctic island over the threats.
Rasmus Jarlov, head of the Danish parliament's defence committee, has described "second thoughts" over the order, but says the country has little choice now that it is their only operational fighter aircraft.
Jarlov has a message for Canada: "choose another fighter jet. They're in for repairs about half the time or even more," he said, "so the Americans have all the power of actually destroying our air force just by shutting down [parts] supplies."
CBC News asked the U.S. ambassador whether he recognized the political implications of the Canadian government choosing the F-35 when many Canadians see the United States itself as a threat, amidst Trump’s recent and repeated talk of the "51st state" and annexing Greenland.![]()
NORAD would be 'altered' if Canada doesn’t buy F-35 jets, warns Trump envoy to Ottawa — CBC News
U.S. President Donald Trump’s envoy to Ottawa is warning of consequences to the continental defence pact if Canada does not move forward with the purchase of 88 F-35 fighter jets.apple.news
"That's crazy. We're not a threat," said Hoekstra.