Pierre Poilievre
- Thread starter Tecumsehsbones
- Start date
Around here, maybe. You have rivers I wouldn't even throw people I don't like into. Float or cling.
Evidently I can.
I side with the Palestinian people vs. Hamas, don't I?
Oh, and the Israeli people who are AGAINST the current Government's Genocide.
So there's that.
Meanwhile... you don't do any of that, you're just "fuck them all" because you can't differentiate at all.
Nah, you can't, obviously.
No, but keep whining 'bout it.
Aww, is getting called out for you being an asshole racist making you mad, Jin?
Would it soothe your feefees if I just said you were a bigot instead?
Wow! I'm shocked you know that, considering how normally self centred you are.
Wait, you said Hong Kong... so you DO know how to say the name of the Island properly... then why the fuck call it Honk Kong? Is it because you hate China... or you're just a bigot (see, I'll drop the racist stuff to bigot just for you!) but you wanna seem, you know, not so much of one now?
Yes, yes it IS under CCP control despite the people wanting otherwise. Of course the CCP is also breaking the agreements it had when it took over Hong Kong but you know... that's a whole other thread to discuss.
I do know geo-politics; apparently more than you do in a lot of instances.
Do you want a cookie for knowing that basic, middle school knowledge?
You want another cookie?
For all that Taiwan is mostly Han Chinese and those who fled Mao with Sun Yat-sen, there's enough of a divide between them, the indigenous populace and those who would rather not be part of China to call them Taiwanese, not Chinese. Cause, you know, respect.
Sure, that's why they're the biggest target of China right now, for their chips.
I don't know why you're throwing out this common knowledge as if it's some shiney new information you just HAD to share...
You'll buy Taiwanese goods because they're from Taiwan, not China.
But you can still not like them, you can still be a bigot, Jin. I mean, by your logic, just because you have that one black friend you can't be racist.
Yeah, you are, but you're a cute one, that's why I still talk to you.
Our next PM, because if he's not.. there will be blood in the streets..
Too many Canadian have had enough.. maybe another FLQ crisis
Too many Canadian have had enough.. maybe another FLQ crisis
Another bullshit utube from a clueless retard.
You need to at least attempt to find something with facts to post.
What part is bullshit?
I watched the press conference he did and it was HORRIBLE.
Like you do?
First off, what part wasn't fact?
Second, he's a commentator, most of his videos are opinion.
Third, that said, the stuff he says IS factual. If you actually look at unbiased sources.
Damn…I thought Paul Reuben’s was still in prison for public masturbation? Trying to butter someone else’s popcorn in a movie theatre or whatever…
…& the humour just rolls through you guys today. On Friday (today), Justin Trudeau will host the Canada-U.S. Economic Summit to “galvanize business and investment across Canada.” The summit will not include any Americans, despite the name, and will instead see Canadian business and labour representatives discuss matters with Trudeau and long-defeated politicians.
“We are bringing together partners across business, civil society and organized labour to find ways to galvanize our economy, create more jobs and bigger paycheques, make it easier to build and trade within our borders and diversify export markets,” Trudeau said.
Trudeau, like so many Liberals, is starting to sound like Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.
apple.news
More jobs? Bigger paycheques? Those are Poilievre talking points.
Beyond the change in tune from Trudeau, there are issues with the composition of the panel that will be advising Trudeau. No offence to Jean Charest or Rachel Notley, but their inclusion as former premiers chosen to allow Trudeau to claim it’s a non-partisan committee is not sitting well with many.
Of course, at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa and the U.S. Consulate in Toronto, the question is why the Trudeau government is holding a Canada-U.S. Economic Summit without inviting them to the table. This “summit” can’t be a smokescreen for further plans to escalate the trade war with the Americans; this should be about how to lower the temperature and avoid tariffs.
What we should be discussing is how to unleash an economy that has been locked down and shackled by years of bad policy from the Trudeau Liberals. They killed the Northern Gateway pipeline, Energy East and Energie Saguenay, three projects that would have given Canada easier access to export markets.
(for Tec, YouTube & “Do you really think the Trudeau-Carney Liberals are about to back pipelines? It won't happen!”)
They have passed Bill C-69, brought in a carbon tax, an emissions cap, a just transition strategy to move people out of the oil and gas sector. Now, though, the Trudeau Liberals – from cabinet ministers to Trudeau’s anointed potential replacement Mark Carney – are all saying they oppose the carbon tax and that we need pipelines.
Carney has spoken about the need for more pipelines in Canada, while also saying that Quebec can have a veto on an East-West pipeline?
Jonathan Wilkinson, who has endorsed Carney, is playing games with the pipeline issue after spending decades opposing pipelines – he’s essentially Steven Guilbeault in a cheap suit and glasses trying to look respectable.
And International Trade Minister Mary Ng – who will no doubt endorse Carney at the behest of the Prime Minister’s Office, all of whom are backing Carney – has also tried to claim they back energy infrastructure after more than nine years of blocking it?
(For Tec, YouTube & “BATRA'S BURNING QUESTIONS: Trudeau puts Liberal Party ahead of country in the fight against...”)
Meanwhile…Parliament has been prorogue’d for the last two months & still is.
“We are bringing together partners across business, civil society and organized labour to find ways to galvanize our economy, create more jobs and bigger paycheques, make it easier to build and trade within our borders and diversify export markets,” Trudeau said.
Trudeau, like so many Liberals, is starting to sound like Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.
LILLEY: Does Trudeau really want to save our economy from Trump's tariffs? — Toronto Sun
Canada needs to expand oil, gas projects to be successful, but that's not something Liberals support
Beyond the change in tune from Trudeau, there are issues with the composition of the panel that will be advising Trudeau. No offence to Jean Charest or Rachel Notley, but their inclusion as former premiers chosen to allow Trudeau to claim it’s a non-partisan committee is not sitting well with many.
Of course, at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa and the U.S. Consulate in Toronto, the question is why the Trudeau government is holding a Canada-U.S. Economic Summit without inviting them to the table. This “summit” can’t be a smokescreen for further plans to escalate the trade war with the Americans; this should be about how to lower the temperature and avoid tariffs.
What we should be discussing is how to unleash an economy that has been locked down and shackled by years of bad policy from the Trudeau Liberals. They killed the Northern Gateway pipeline, Energy East and Energie Saguenay, three projects that would have given Canada easier access to export markets.
They have passed Bill C-69, brought in a carbon tax, an emissions cap, a just transition strategy to move people out of the oil and gas sector. Now, though, the Trudeau Liberals – from cabinet ministers to Trudeau’s anointed potential replacement Mark Carney – are all saying they oppose the carbon tax and that we need pipelines.
Carney has spoken about the need for more pipelines in Canada, while also saying that Quebec can have a veto on an East-West pipeline?
Jonathan Wilkinson, who has endorsed Carney, is playing games with the pipeline issue after spending decades opposing pipelines – he’s essentially Steven Guilbeault in a cheap suit and glasses trying to look respectable.
And International Trade Minister Mary Ng – who will no doubt endorse Carney at the behest of the Prime Minister’s Office, all of whom are backing Carney – has also tried to claim they back energy infrastructure after more than nine years of blocking it?
Meanwhile…Parliament has been prorogue’d for the last two months & still is.
Yeah. Galvanize. That's what you do with trash cans (that's "bins" to you, Blackleaf).
Thanks for the insight, Ron. "Party over country" seems to be a disease y'all got even worse'n we do.
For what it's worth (damn near nothing), I'm in for Pete.
Poilievre, not Buttigieg (well, him too, just not for PM of Canada).
Thanks for the insight, Ron. "Party over country" seems to be a disease y'all got even worse'n we do.
For what it's worth (damn near nothing), I'm in for Pete.
Poilievre, not Buttigieg (well, him too, just not for PM of Canada).
Feel free. I'll even answer.
Be aware, my idea of "good for Canada" has a strong shot of "good for America" in it.
First, I think he'll move to make the Canadian economy more stable: higher value to the Canadollar, better-integrated planning for continuing to drill, pump, and mine on one hand, and develop promising alternatives on the other.
Second, I think he'll step up to strengthening the Canadian Forces.
Third, I think he'll treat Dumb Donnie and whoever comes next "agnostically," by which I mean agree, disagree, cooperate, resist, all moderately and with a focus on what's good for Canada, with an understanding that what's good for North America IS good for Canada.
True Dope has, in his own haphazard, inconsistent way, moved the ball forward significantly on giving those who are not White male nominally-Christian Canadians in plaid flannel shirts an equal voice in Canadian culture and politics. But in many ways he overdid it, and fomented a lot of unnecessary resistance and resentment. Seems to me, from an outsider's medium-informed viewpoint, that a certain retrenchment would be a good idea, whilst the notion percolates some and y'all move toward the overarching national values of 1) what you bring to the table in terms of skill, knowledge, and motivation is more important than what group you belong to. and 2) every Canadian deserves an equal shot at an education, a career, and "the pursuit of happiness." I think M Poo-Lover will focus more on the individual than on the group or groups to which the individual belongs.
It's time for that.
I stand ready to be educated by all sides of the Canadian debate(s) on any or all of the above.
Just a view from abroad (Yo! I ain't no broad!).
Why bother?…& the humour just rolls through you guys today. On Friday (today), Justin Trudeau will host the Canada-U.S. Economic Summit to “galvanize business and investment across Canada.” The summit will not include any Americans, despite the name, and will instead see Canadian business and labour representatives discuss matters with Trudeau and long-defeated politicians.
“We are bringing together partners across business, civil society and organized labour to find ways to galvanize our economy, create more jobs and bigger paycheques, make it easier to build and trade within our borders and diversify export markets,” Trudeau said.
Trudeau, like so many Liberals, is starting to sound like Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.
More jobs? Bigger paycheques? Those are Poilievre talking points.LILLEY: Does Trudeau really want to save our economy from Trump's tariffs? — Toronto Sun
Canada needs to expand oil, gas projects to be successful, but that's not something Liberals support
Beyond the change in tune from Trudeau, there are issues with the composition of the panel that will be advising Trudeau. No offence to Jean Charest or Rachel Notley, but their inclusion as former premiers chosen to allow Trudeau to claim it’s a non-partisan committee is not sitting well with many.
Of course, at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa and the U.S. Consulate in Toronto, the question is why the Trudeau government is holding a Canada-U.S. Economic Summit without inviting them to the table. This “summit” can’t be a smokescreen for further plans to escalate the trade war with the Americans; this should be about how to lower the temperature and avoid tariffs.
What we should be discussing is how to unleash an economy that has been locked down and shackled by years of bad policy from the Trudeau Liberals. They killed the Northern Gateway pipeline, Energy East and Energie Saguenay, three projects that would have given Canada easier access to export markets.
(for Tec, YouTube & “Do you really think the Trudeau-Carney Liberals are about to back pipelines? It won't happen!”)
They have passed Bill C-69, brought in a carbon tax, an emissions cap, a just transition strategy to move people out of the oil and gas sector. Now, though, the Trudeau Liberals – from cabinet ministers to Trudeau’s anointed potential replacement Mark Carney – are all saying they oppose the carbon tax and that we need pipelines.
Carney has spoken about the need for more pipelines in Canada, while also saying that Quebec can have a veto on an East-West pipeline?
Jonathan Wilkinson, who has endorsed Carney, is playing games with the pipeline issue after spending decades opposing pipelines – he’s essentially Steven Guilbeault in a cheap suit and glasses trying to look respectable.
And International Trade Minister Mary Ng – who will no doubt endorse Carney at the behest of the Prime Minister’s Office, all of whom are backing Carney – has also tried to claim they back energy infrastructure after more than nine years of blocking it?
(For Tec, YouTube & “BATRA'S BURNING QUESTIONS: Trudeau puts Liberal Party ahead of country in the fight against...”)
Meanwhile…Parliament has been prorogue’d for the last two months & still is.
Just worked a 16 but I'll reply to this as it's a conversation that needs to happen, without the usual bullshit.