The one person on CanCon capable of understanding an analogy (and apparently aware of the requirements for a street-legal automobile).Uhm…no.
Formula1 on a Canadian City Street. Just off the top of my head I’m gonna say nope.
1) If the tires project out farther than the body of the vehicle then nope.
2) if no horn then nope.
3) no headlights? Then nope.
4) no tail lights or signal lights or license plate light or back up lights or marker lights…??? Then nope. Where would a license plate get mounted on a Formula One vehicle anyway?
5) functional horn? If nope then nope.
6) no mudflaps? Then nope
7) Government approved (not track approved) bumpers and bumper inserts and crumple zones and so on and so forth? Then nope & nope & nope.
8) Then insurance. If an insurance company is not going to insure this vehicle to be on the road in Moose Knuckle, SK, then it can’t be on the road.
9) The tires, though they would be something incredibly freaky beyond a Z rating…. They’re probably not street legal with the lack of tread.
There’s probably a whole lot more but then we’re gonna get into the decibel level from the sound it emits, and a minimum height requirement I’m assuming, and then the approved functional climate controls to utilize this thing in our climate will be an issue.
Well done, sir.