To IMPEACH ????

Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Careful, OB if you make two post in a row, sleepy will get mad at you.
;)

Now, about using the WAPO as a source

'Fake News' And How The Washington Post Rewrote Its Story On Russian Hacking Of The Power Grid

...Yet, it turns out this narrative was false and as the chronology below will show, illustrates how effectively false and misleading news can ricochet through the global news echo chamber through the pages of top tier newspapers that fail to properly verify their facts...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevl...ssian-hacking-of-the-power-grid/#76c110af7ad5

It's funny, but sleepy gets mad because I have used alex jones as a source 3 times out of 20,886 posts and of course also used OTHER sources to verify the same posts, so with all the times YOU use the WAPO, which we know DELIBERATELY lies (like sleepy has been know to do about his all his apartheid zealotry ) he is likely freaking every time you cite the wapo too.

Crazy, I know, but there it is.
 
Last edited:
DaSleeper

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
 
Ocean Breeze

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Curious Cdn said:
All those GOP Senators know where their bread is buttered and it's not on the side of the Republic.
Click to expand...
indeed........THAT sums it up. this could set the standard for future administrations. ....... No problem going a bit rogue. No problem with overt Hippocracy ... Create the smoke and mirrors........confuse the public with spin........and it is just fine. Everything is subject to "interpretation".

thought A. Schiff's closing statement was effective.

The big difference between the dems and the Repubs...........at these hearings seems to be that at least the Dems are polite, articulate...........while the Republicans are aggressive and down right nasty.

Another notable things........When Clinton was being impeached........he kept out of the proceedings...........and maintained whatever dignity he had.........while continuing to do his job. Trump has to mix it up and get in the middle of it.( with his trashy tweets)......... and seems to spend most of his time watching the TV..(and TWEETING).......so when is he working??
 
Last edited:
H

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
with the GOP getting wiped out left and right it is difficult to see how they think Trump is going to help them in 2020
 
Walter

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,887
126
63
JLM said:
OR what may be more likely is the Democrats are just itching for their candidate to win, but haven't got one capable of it and are just drumming up shit against Trump! :)
Click to expand...
Making up shit is more accurate.
 
Walter

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,887
126
63
Ocean Breeze said:

Volker says he should have seen push for Ukraine probe as targeting Biden
Kurt Volker added that he did not think 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden acted in ways designed to favor his son or Burisma, an obscure natural gas company that employed Hunter Biden.
source: WAPO
Click to expand...
Utter bullshit.
 
Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Jim Jordan Ends Ambassador Taylor's Career (Impeachment Part 1)

John Ward "kills" again...VERY funny AND Very factual...(contains VIDEO!)

I really recommend people watch this video...the trumphaters will not survive if you do.

Ambassador Taylor: ( After Jim Jordan totals his story completely with the facts)
" let me just say I don't consider myself a star witness for anything!'
" I am not here to take one side or the the other!".
" My understanding is coming only from people that I talked to"


from the comments:

DANNYBOY73
19 hours ago
"No linkage"

- Republican Jim Jordan 2019.
The End.

Danny Martinez
18 hours ago
I feel like the comments is missing something

Oh yeah, epstein didnt kill himself
 
Last edited:
Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Curious Cdn said:
All those GOP Senators know where their bread is buttered and it's not on the side of the Republic.
Click to expand...
So, as usual you are recommending PAID treason. No wonder you want everyone else's guns killer. AS pelosi has intimated, the american voter is too dumb to choose the "right" candidate. So you best do that for them with a coup.

While calling everyone else a nazi.

WOW ...and you tootiefruitie sora$$es think you are going to run a hole country?



OK doood!​
​
 
Last edited:
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Ocean Breeze said:
indeed........THAT sums it up. this could set the standard for future administrations. ....... No problem going a bit rogue. No problem with overt Hippocracy ... Create the smoke and mirrors........confuse the public with spin........and it is just fine. Everything is subject to "interpretation".
thought A. Schiff's closing statement was effective.
The big difference between the dems and the Repubs...........at these hearings seems to be that at least the Dems are polite, articulate...........while the Republicans are aggressive and down right nasty.
Another notable things........When Clinton was being impeached........he kept out of the proceedings...........and maintained whatever dignity he had.........while continuing to do his job. Trump has to mix it up and get in the middle of it.( with his trashy tweets)......... and seems to spend most of his time watching the TV..(and TWEETING).......so when is he working??
Click to expand...

Here from your favourite source right now WaPo

Opinions | The Democrats’ impeachment bombshells aren’t exploding

As we enter week two of the House impeachment inquiry, it seems pretty clear that Democrats are suffering a massive ordnance failure. Their “bombshells” are not exploding.
The first unexploded bombshell came when acting ambassador to Ukraine William B. Taylor Jr. testified that a member of his embassy staff had overhead a cellphone conversation between President Trump and Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, in a Kyiv restaurant in which Trump discussed the need for Ukrainian officials to pursue “investigations.” Aha, Democrats cried! A firsthand witness could now testify they heard Trump pressing the Ukrainians for investigations.
Um, so what? Trump had already released a rough transcript of his call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in which he had pressed him for investigations. The overheard call told us nothing we did not already know. Indeed, the only one likely to get in trouble from this revelation is Sondland, who violated operational security by calling the president in public on an unsecure cellphone.
How about former Ukraine ambassador Marie Yovanovitch’s testimony? We learned that Trump fired her without explanation (which as president he had every right to do) and besmirched her reputation. Yes, Trump treated her horribly, but being a jerk is not an impeachable offense.
Then, as though to prove the point, Trump attacked her on Twitter as she was testifying, writing, “Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad.” Democrats pounced, trying to turn Trump’s blunder into a new charge of “witness intimidation.” Please. Witness intimidation is defined as “the threatening of a crucial court witnesses by pressure or extortion to compel him/her to not to testify.” Yovanovitch had already been fired as ambassador and was in the process of testifying. No bombshell there, either.
Then on Tuesday, Democrats asked Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman about his assertion that Zelensky had mentioned “Burisma” in his call with Trump, even though the word was not in the transcript released to the public. The suggestion was that the transcript had been doctored. Vindman testified that it was “not a significant omission” and that the career staff who produce the transcripts simply “didn’t catch the word.” In other words, there was no bombshell scrubbing of the transcript.
They got nothing damaging from Vice President Pence’s Eurasia adviser Jennifer Williams, who testified Tuesday morning that investigations never came up in Pence’s meeting with Zelensky in Warsaw. They got nothing from former special envoy Kurt Volker or former National Security Council staffer Tim Morrison on Tuesday afternoon. So after three days of hearings, Democrats have failed to produce anything remotely explosive.
That means they are losing. Polls show the vast majority of Americans agree with Vindman that the Trump-Zelensky call “was inappropriate.” They agreed with Vindman before he testified. But only a minority of Americans say Trump’s conduct warrants impeachment and removal. And the hearings are not changing their minds. Indeed, support for the impeachment inquiry has ticked down since the hearings began, as has the number of Americans tuning in to watch.
That means Democrats are failing to convince Americans that Trump’s misconduct rises to the level of treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors. In blackjack, the tie goes to the dealer; in impeachment, the tie goes to the president. If Republicans fight Democrats to a draw, Trump wins.
Indeed, Republicans increasingly seem to believe impeachment will help them at the polls next November. A few weeks ago, Senate Republicans were discussing the possibility of a quick dismissal of any charges sent over by the House. They suggested they might follow the precedent set by Sen. Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) during the Clinton impeachment trial and offer a motion to dismiss the charges soon after the trial begins. They would need just a simple majority to end the proceedings.
Now, Republican senators appear to be moving in the opposite direction. The Post has reported that there is discussion of drawing out the impeachment trial to keep the six Democratic senators who are running for president trapped in Washington and off the campaign trail. If Republicans thought impeachment was hurting them, there is zero chance they would be talking about an extended trial. As long as they show they are taking their jobs as jurors seriously, an impeachment trial can energize their base and help them keep the Senate and hold the White House.
Indeed, impeachment could be to the 2020 election what the Brett M. Kavanaugh hearings were to 2018 Senate midterms — except GOP voters see Democrats smearing not just Trump’s Supreme Court pick but Trump himself.
That is a message on which Trump will happily run.
Click to expand...

Gotta be disheartening that the most anti-Trump news paper is saying this is a nothing burger
 
Ocean Breeze

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48

Top diplomat says there was a 'quid pro quo' involving aid to Ukraine and probe of Bidens, in his bluntest characterization yet

In his prepared testimony for the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union, said more directly than he ever had before that President Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, sought to condition an important White House invitation for Ukraine��s new president to demands that his country publicly launch investigations that could damage Trump��s Democratic political opponents.

Sondland also told the committee that while he never knew for sure if the White House had frozen nearly $400 million in security assistance as part of the pressure campaign against Ukraine, he operated as if that was the case.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...l_news__alert-politics--alert-national&wpmk=1
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Ocean Breeze said:

Top diplomat says there was a 'quid pro quo' involving aid to Ukraine and probe of Bidens, in his bluntest characterization yet

In his prepared testimony for the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union, said more directly than he ever had before that President Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, sought to condition an important White House invitation for Ukraine��s new president to demands that his country publicly launch investigations that could damage Trump��s Democratic political opponents.

Sondland also told the committee that while he never knew for sure if the White House had frozen nearly $400 million in security assistance as part of the pressure campaign against Ukraine, he operated as if that was the case.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...l_news__alert-politics--alert-national&wpmk=1
Click to expand...


Aren't you getting tired of this boring subject yet? Especially since NOTHING will ever come of it! :)
 
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Ocean Breeze said:

Top diplomat says there was a 'quid pro quo' involving aid to Ukraine and probe of Bidens, in his bluntest characterization yet
In his prepared testimony for the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union, said more directly than he ever had before that President Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, sought to condition an important White House invitation for Ukraine��s new president to demands that his country publicly launch investigations that could damage Trump��s Democratic political opponents.
Sondland also told the committee that while he never knew for sure if the White House had frozen nearly $400 million in security assistance as part of the pressure campaign against Ukraine, he operated as if that was the case.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...l_news__alert-politics--alert-national&wpmk=1
Click to expand...

You and they must not be listening to the same hearing that I am, he said inexplicitly no 'Quid pro quo'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom