Gun Control is Completely Useless.

[B00Mer]

I think a million Canadians should just start carrying concealed regardless.

What they going to build prisons for everyone and take that much revenue out of the economy?

If enough people just do it, the laws get changed

 

[Twin_Moose]

They already do in the underworld Boomer and the law abiding are paying for it

 

[JLM]

Well, ya gotta keep them bad people in their place. You know, Muzzies. And Jooz. And Caflicks.

And Ambulance Chasers!

 

[spilledthebeer]

WRONG!



It is a constitutional right recognized in the Bill of Rights of 1689, part of our constitutional framework.


In fact, exactly the opposite of your contention is true.


The royal signature on the Bill of Rights of 1689 was a condition of William of Orange taking the throne after the Great Revolution.


It was the people forcing the Crown to recognize their rights.

Actually Colpy......................................


I think you would find that LIE-berals will tell you the old British Law has been superceded..................................


by the new Cdn Constitution........................................


that DOES NOT MENTION EITHER PROPERTY RIGHTS...........................................


OR the right to bear arms!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And LIE-berals would then DARE YOU..................................


to meet them in court and prove them wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You might find that difficult to do...................................................


as long as a LIE-beral judge was on the bench!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It costs upward of #100 grand to launch a major legal challenge on anything these days..............................


so DO YOU have that kind of money to burn chasing a principle???????????????????????????



They stick together you know..........................................


LIE-berals and judges...............................................


working AGAINST US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


JUST LOOK at the hoops Doug Ford had to go through to get the size of Toronto City Council shrunk down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


A LIE-beral judge SAID NO- and denied the Ford application.......................................


even though it was COMMON KNOWLEDGE that Ford would win on Appeal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


But THERE is the deal..............................................


LIE-berals wanted to STALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Get those Toronto Hogs re-elected......................................


and then hope like HELL that Ford would lose the 2022 election.......................................


so Toronto Silly Hall HOGS could continue on their Gravy Train..........................................


un-interrupted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Curious Cdn]

WRONG!
It is a constitutional right recognized in the Bill of Rights of 1689, part of our constitutional framework.
In fact, exactly the opposite of your contention is true.
The royal signature on the Bill of Rights of 1689 was a condition of William of Orange taking the throne after the Great Revolution.
It was the people forcing the Crown to recognize their rights.

So, time to smuggle in an arquebus from Buffalo in the trunk of the car?

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

So, time to smuggle in an arquebus from Buffalo in the trunk of the car?

How 'bout a blowgun?

 

[taxslave]

But cliffy and breezy will be happy. Or don't you care about their happyness?

 

[JamesBondo]

We don't have a right to bear arms. It is a privilege granted by the Crown.

I know in my heart that you are so full of shit on this.

I believe that ultimately I am responsible for my own health and welfare. There are times of emergency and disaster when I have to provide my own food, my own first aid, my own fire protection, my own security. It is contemptible for someone to feel that a government that is willing to do this for me during good times is allowed to also take the responsibility away from me.

 

[Curious Cdn]

I know in my heart that you are so full of shit on this.
I believe that ultimately I am responsible for my own health and welfare. There are times of emergency and disaster when I have to provide my own food, my own first aid, my own fire protection, my own security. It is contemptible for someone to feel that a government that is willing to do this for me during good times is allowed to also take the responsibility away from me.

You are an enemy of the Crown.

 

[Colpy]

So, time to smuggle in an arquebus from Buffalo in the trunk of the car?

A silly answer that begs the question; why do you so hate the ancient rights of free people?

 

[MHz]

I think a million Canadians should just start carrying concealed regardless.

What they going to build prisons for everyone and take that much revenue out of the economy?

If enough people just do it, the laws get changed

That would create how many jobs?? putting how much money into the economy, . . . retard.

 

[Curious Cdn]

A silly answer that begs the question; why do you so hate the ancient rights of free people?

Your interpretation of our "rights" ...

Carry a gun around St. John in the open in a holster. Take it to court. Let's see what your "rights" really consist of.

 

[Colpy]

Your interpretation of our "rights" ...

Carry a gun around St. John in the open in a holster. Take it to court. Let's see what your "rights" really consist of.

In the British constitutional tradition, the right is limited by "as allowed by law", which legitimizes such things as licenses. As I said before, the limited right is for the purposes of defense (already banned in Canada, unconstitutionally) but most importantly it is a RIGHT, not a privilege.......as you originally claimed, and which I took issue with.



Now, perhaps you could quit running the goalposts down the field, you're starting to look tired.

 

[spaminator]

Two more Florida deputies fired for inaction in Parkland school massacre
Reuters
Published:
June 26, 2019
Updated:
June 26, 2019 4:52 PM EDT
Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony, centre, announces that two additional deputies have been fired as a result of the agency's internal affairs investigation into the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Wednesday, June 26, 2019. (Joe Cavaretta/South Florida Sun-Sentinel via AP)
A Florida sheriff has fired two more deputies, alleging that they failed to take action to stop the 2018 massacre of 17 students and staff at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history.
The deputies, Edward Eason and Josh Stambaugh, were terminated for neglecting their duty during the Feb. 14, 2018 shootings, Broward County Sheriff Gregory Tony said on Wednesday. The decision followed an investigation into the conduct of seven deputies.
In addition to the fatalities, 17 people were wounded in the assault in Parkland, Florida. An expelled student Nikolas Cruz, who was 19 at the time, is awaiting trial on murder and attempted murder charges.
Two Broward County deputies, Scot Peterson and Brian Miller, were previously accused of neglecting their duty during the shootings. Peterson was suspended and later left the force, while Miller was terminated.
Peterson was charged on June 5 with felony child neglect and negligence after having taken cover outside the school building while the gunman went on a rampage inside. Peterson was briefly jailed but is currently out on bond.
No disciplinary action will be taken against the remaining three deputies, Tony said.
“As we conclude this final chapter for this organization in terms of this internal affairs investigation, we are now going to continue moving forward with fixing the issue that exists here in the agency related to training,” Tony told a news briefing.
The deputies’ union said it would challenge the firings of Eason, Stambaugh and Miller in arbitration.
Jeff Bell, president of the Broward Sheriff’s Office Deputies Association, said the investigation that resulted in their dismissals was tainted because it was not completed in a timely way. He said the terminated deputies were being made scapegoats for the shootings.
“Once again, the deputies and sergeants are left holding the bag for all the discipline that’s being applied,” he said by phone.
Peterson also faces legal trouble in civil court. Last May, the father one of the students killed in Parkland filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the former deputy.
Another ripple effect of the shootings occurred at the top of the department in January when newly elected Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suspended Scott Israel as Broward County sheriff, claiming he showed leadership failures at the time. DeSantis named Tony as his replacement.
http://torontosun.com/news/crime/tw...ired-for-inaction-in-parkland-school-massacre

 

[JamesBondo]

Carry a gun around St. John in the open in a holster. Take it to court. Let's see what your "rights" really consist of.

Too much information. Clearly your gun is detachable. Please don't carry it around in an open holster.

 

[JamesBondo]

A silly answer that begs the question; why do you so hate the ancient rights of free people?

Some people look to 'the government' to solve all their problems. Any logic or reason that leads away from that is dealt with willful ignorance
.

 

[Curious Cdn]

Some people look to 'the government' to solve all their problems. Any logic or reason that leads away from that is dealt with willful ignorance
.

Some of us have loyalty to our countries. Other whackos think that it is their right to arm themselves, join private militias to wage war against the same country. Two centuries ago, traitors like that would have been swinging from gibbets, not posting their blah-blah on anonymous forums.

 

[Danbones]

Says the genocidal nazi/commie globalist Canada hating liar.

You just can't wait to start shooting the unarmed peasants in record numbers who can't shoot back at you can you?

Yet you run from bar fights you start with your own yap.

 

[Colpy]

Some of us have loyalty to our countries. Other whackos think that it is their right to arm themselves, join private militias to wage war against the same country. Two centuries ago, traitors like that would have been swinging from gibbets, not posting their blah-blah on anonymous forums.

Reply deleted.


Not in the mood to deal with idiots this morning.


Later, maybe.

 

[Curious Cdn]

If it were not for those "whackos (that) think that it is their right to arm themselves, join private militias to wage war against the same country." you would not be free.
The USA did it first, in exactly the way you discribe.
When Canada tried it in 1837, the Brits were so afraid of another North American rebellion they sent "Radical Jack" Durham to figure out a way to forestall further insurrection. He advised a number of things, most importantly gov't responsible to the people.
The Yanks, in large part, bought our freedom too. With armed rebellion, touched off btw by the British attempt to seize arms.

Crazy bastards and their self-appointed agenda do not make me freer. Stand for election, you bloody cowards, so we can see what you really think. If you're ready to "seize power" for your own self-delusions of righteousness, you are our enemies.