Global Warming: still the ‘Greatest Scam in History’

[Danbones]

PS:
Oh look! It isn't the sun that's causing the new ice age, it's man maid volcanoes!

SCIENCE | April 30. 2013. 16:30
Why changes in solar activity don’t mean a ‘mini ice age’ is on the way
https://www.carbonbrief.org/why-changes-in-solar-activity-dont-mean-a-mini-ice-age-is-on-the-way

Geeezus!!!!...and to think they all go off according to the solar cycles too...


One scientist says this temp drop could be the dawn of an itty bitty ice age

Complain all you want, it is apparently THAT cold.

Montreal has just survived an all-time record cold streak. Six crisp consecutive days below -17C degrees (underscored by exactly zero long johns in my size at the store earlier this week). Friends in Toronto are no better off.

Environment Canada has issued an extreme cold temperature warning to folks in the GTA (the extreme cold criteria is a bracing -30C degrees, so do get to the local long john store today).

There was also talk of brave, well-bundled snow zombies in Edmonton. Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia have all received similar temp alerts. In case you've been cleverly hibernating since November, it's officially colder in Canada than usual. Anyone who isn't a Yeti should note that this newer, cooler Canada could be here for, wait for it, another two decades. Weep as you see fit, your tears will freeze anyway.

No kleenex needed! Bonus.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-cold-weather-streak-1.4470272

The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare

Global Warming: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, but it has a very important job: It measures U.S. temperatures. Unfortunately, it seems to be a captive of the global warming religion.

Its data is fraudulent.

What do we mean by fraudulent? How about this: NOAA has made repeated "adjustments" to its data, for the presumed scientific reason of making the data sets more accurate.

Nothing wrong with that. Except, all their changes point to one thing — lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past, and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present.
https://www.investors.com/politics/...stical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/


So how come Everything, yes...EVERYTHING about you trumphaters proves to be FRAUDULENT?

 

[Danbones]

Blast of snow for New England before record-cold Thanksgiving

Record lows are expected throughout the region, with daytime temperatures forecast to be 20 to 35 degrees below normal
http://sandhillsexpress.com/abc_nat...before-recordcold-thanksgiving-abcid36131389/

 

[petros]

Globally? We have record highs here.

Please link to "the record".

 

[Bar Sinister]

I really have to laugh at how poorly global warming deniers understand climate. They frequently use local weather conditions as proof that the Earth is not getting warmer, but completely fail to understand that the amount of solar energy reaching the Earth hardly fluctuates at all. In fact solar output fluctuates by only about one-tenth of one percent. What that means is that even though it may be unseasonably cold in some locals the overall average temperature of the Earth has not changed on that particular day. However, the deniers insist on posting irrelevant and often anecdotal data as proof that GW is not happening, when in fact worldwide climate data proves that it is. So far as I am concerned unless climate deniers can actually offer scientific proof that the Earth is cooling or as best, not warming, then the case for denial is closed.



If you are interested you can read more about solar output and the global warming in the links below.



https://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/solar_variability.html


https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2671/long-term-warming-trend-continued-in-2017-nasa-noaa/

 

[JLM]

I really have to laugh at how poorly global warming deniers understand climate. They frequently use local weather conditions as proof that the Earth is not getting warmer, but completely fail to understand that the amount of solar energy reaching the Earth hardly fluctuates at all. In fact solar output fluctuates by only about one-tenth of one percent. What that means is that even though it may be unseasonably cold in some locals the overall average temperature of the Earth has not changed on that particular day. However, the deniers insist on posting irrelevant and often anecdotal data as proof that GW is not happening, when in fact worldwide climate data proves that it is. So far as I am concerned unless climate deniers can actually offer scientific proof that the Earth is cooling or as best, not warming, then the case for denial is closed.



If you are interested you can read more about solar output and the global warming in the links below.



https://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/solar_variability.html


https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2671/long-term-warming-trend-continued-in-2017-nasa-noaa/

You tend to forget that not everyone is as stupid as you are! Weather is like one piece in a jigsaw puzzle. Without it you don't have the complete picture!

 

[darkbeaver]

Globally? We have record highs here.

I,m not surprised and you,re not the only one experianceing local out of ordinary climate which includes a mix of hot and cold. Some deserts have grass growing in them now and the locals have never seen any nor had there parents.

 

[darkbeaver]

The derogotory term "denier"is perhaps most applicable to officials and there agencys. Of course these officials are dependents of the most powerfull ruling class and even if thier own driveways are plugged with supposed/proposed impossible snow they are obliged to conform to the official word or join those fellows on the bread lines. Can you appreciate the looming extermination event? Having trouble adapting to that certain enevitability? Are you in denial?

 

[darkbeaver]

I really have to laugh at how poorly global warming deniers understand climate. They frequently use local weather conditions as proof that the Earth is not getting warmer, but completely fail to understand that the amount of solar energy reaching the Earth hardly fluctuates at all. In fact solar output fluctuates by only about one-tenth of one percent. What that means is that even though it may be unseasonably cold in some locals the overall average temperature of the Earth has not changed on that particular day. However, the deniers insist on posting irrelevant and often anecdotal data as proof that GW is not happening, when in fact worldwide climate data proves that it is. So far as I am concerned unless climate deniers can actually offer scientific proof that the Earth is cooling or as best, not warming, then the case for denial is closed.



If you are interested you can read more about solar output and the global warming in the links below.



https://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/solar_variability.html


https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2671/long-term-warming-trend-continued-in-2017-nasa-noaa/

Global warming stopped at arround .5 C some time ago. It,s obvious that you have not considered that you may be mistaken, a year or two from now you,ll be more informed .

 

[MHz]

How much more will that cost, it sounds very, very expensive.

 

[Gilgamesh]

What a stupid cartoon. Recent fires in SoCal have SFA to do with global warming and a lot to do with population expansion, and forest mismanagement.

The bs never ends.

 

[Bar Sinister]

You tend to forget that not everyone is as stupid as you are! Weather is like one piece in a jigsaw puzzle. Without it you don't have the complete picture!

Yes, I am the stupid one because I actually understand how world climate works. Coming from someone with your level of ignorance it ia actually a form of praise.

 

[Bar Sinister]

What a stupid cartoon. Recent fires in SoCal have SFA to do with global warming and a lot to do with population expansion, and forest mismanagement.

The bs never ends.

Yeah right. Continual droughts and higher than normal temperatures have nothing to do with it. Apparently you are fully buying in the to BS Trump routinely spins out. Do you have your rake?

 

[Bar Sinister]

Global warming stopped at arround .5 C some time ago. It,s obvious that you have not considered that you may be mistaken, a year or two from now you,ll be more informed .

".5?' That is strange because it is already 0.8 higher.

 

[JLM]

Yes, I am the stupid one because I actually understand how world climate works. Coming from someone with your level of ignorance it ia actually a form of praise.

Don't persist in being an idiot! I've forgotten more about climate than you ever knew!

 

[Bar Sinister]

Don't persist in being an idiot! I've forgotten more about climate than you ever knew!

Then please explain why you do not seem to understand that the amount of solar energy striking the Earth each year is almost constant. Or is that part of what you have forgotten?

 

[JLM]

Then please explain why you do not seem to understand that the amount of solar energy striking the Earth each year is almost constant. Or is that part of what you have forgotten?

That is an assessment that you have made, which is fairly inaccurate.

 

[Danbones]

NOAA Scientists Falsify Data to Dupe World Leaders on Climate Change
Scientific sleight-of-hand pushed economy-hobbling Paris Agreement
https://observer.com/2017/02/noaa-fake-global-warming-data-paris-agreement-climate-change/

Maurice Strong, the Father of America’s Destruction

His name is Maurice Strong, born in Canada, lived in New York, and now exiled in China, but still the power behind Obama and the liberal House and Senate of America. To start to understand this man and his influence read his statement below to a group of reporters.

“In order to save the planet, the group [GIM] decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about? This group of world leaders [GIM] forms a secret society to bring about an economic collapse.”

Maurice Strong - regarding Generation Investment Management LLP
http://www.unitypublishing.com/Government/Maurice Strong.htm

from the link:

George Soros and his Canadian sidekick, Kyoto architect Maurice Strong, are the brains behind the likes of Al Gore, Mikhail Gorbachev and Barak Obama, all who belong to the above and the “Chicago Climate Exchange” which will make billions on climate change.

Strong, the silent partner, is a man whose name often draws a blank on the Washington cocktail circuit... ...That’s because he spends most of his time in China where he has been working to make the communist country the world’s next superpower.

Yeah, NOW we are getting down to the heart of all of this BS aren't we?

 

[Danbones]

I really have to laugh at how poorly global warming deniers understand climate. They frequently use local weather conditions as proof that the Earth is not getting warmer, but completely fail to understand that the amount of solar energy reaching the Earth hardly fluctuates at all.

In fact solar output fluctuates by only about one-tenth of one percent. What that means is that even though it may be unseasonably cold in some locals the overall average temperature of the Earth has not changed on that particular day.

However, the deniers insist on posting irrelevant and often anecdotal data as proof that GW is not happening, when in fact worldwide climate data proves that it is. So far as I am concerned unless climate deniers can actually offer scientific proof that the Earth is cooling or as best, not warming, then the case for denial is closed.
If you are interested you can read more about solar output and the global warming in the links below.
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/solar_variability.html
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2671/long-term-warming-trend-continued-in-2017-nasa-noaa/

First of all, Climate has weather in it. We have had climate change on the planet since day one and always will.

Here the facts will call you a fibber outright


1. Introduction
The Sun’s radiative output provides 99.96 % of the energy driving Earth’s climate (Kren 2015). Historically misnamed the “solar constant,” the Sun’s total radiant energy incident on the Earth varies with time. Even small changes in this energy over long periods of time can affect Earth’s climate, as demonstrated in modern times by Eddy (1976) and substantiated by more recent studies (Haigh 2007; Lean & Rind 2008; Gray et al. 2010; Ineson et al. 2011; Ermolli et al. 2013; Solanki et al. 2013).

Total solar irradiance (TSI), the spatially- and spectrally-integrated radiant energy from the Sun incident at the top of the Earth’s atmosphere and normalized to one astronomical unit, has been measured with space-borne instruments continuously since 1978 (see Figure 1).
This measure JSWSC, 2016, doi:10.1051/swsc/2016025 Magnitudes and Timescales of TSI Variability, G. Kopp, p. 2 averages 1361 W m-2 (Kopp & Lean 2011) with typical increases of ~0.1 % from the minimum to the maximum of the 11-year solar cycle during recent decades (Fröhlich 2006).

Additional and occasionally larger variations occur as sunspots and facular magnetic features emerge, transit, and decay on the Earth-facing portion of the solar disk.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1606/1606.05258.pdf


Solar output and heat are not the same thing pal. Heat is one very narrow band of radiation which was hitting the planet in whatever form for several BILLION years before man. With all types of climate change.

Also it's SOLAR and COSMIC radiation which forms clouds and this is influenced by FLUCTUATIONS in some of the sun's output of NON heat type radiation, so again you and your CROOKED X-perts are talking KOO KOO.

A team of scientists from the National Space Institute at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU Space) and the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem has linked large solar eruptions to changes in Earth's cloud cover in a study based on over 25 years of satellite observations.
https://phys.org/news/2016-08-solar-impact-earth-cloud.html#jCp

Solar cycles cause global warming

A new peer-reviewed study on Surface Warming and the Solar Cycle found that times of high solar activity are on average 0.2°C warmer than times of low solar activity, and that there is a polar amplification of the warming. This result is the first to document a statistically significant globally coherent temperature response to the solar cycle, the authors note (source: Mark Morano).
https://www.skepticalscience.com/solar-cycles-global-warming.htm




You will never win an argument quoting the deliberately mistaken man!

 

[Danbones]

BITTER COLD SMASHES RECORDS
https://www.accuweather.com/en/weat...coldest-on-record-in-northeastern-us/70006672

 

[petros]

".5?' That is strange because it is already 0.8 higher.

0.8 higher than when?