As if a huge debt burden were a good thing.
... the bigliest everything ...
As if a huge debt burden were a good thing.
... the bigliest everything ...
that real gross domestic product will expand by 3.3 percent in the 2018 calendar year, before slowing to 2.4 percent in 2019 and 1.8 percent in 2020, based on the fourth quarter year-over-year figure. In June, CBO forecast 2 percent growth this year. The Trump 2019 budget request assumed that tax cuts would propel the economy to 3.1 percent growth this year and remain above 3 percent through 2024.
Didn't Trump once hint that the US could just choose to default on its debt?
Doesn't he always run his businesses that way?
Start a rumor like that and you will be believed by everyone with T. D. S. in the forum!Didn't Trump once hint that the US could just choose to default on its debt?
Start a rumor like that and you will be believed by everyone with T. D. S. in the forum!
Anyway, back on topic Trump wants it to be the biggest debt the world has ever seen. MAGA!
Well... that's fake.
You're right. I don't think he's that stupid as to intentionally grow the debt. He just grows it to pay to the military the wall etc. etc. etc.
After Trump's blistering attack against allies, he and other NATO leaders approve plans to bolster defenses against Russia
NATO issued a statement that leaders, including President Trump, approved a tough package of measures to improve the alliance's ability to defend against Russia.
Leaders also said they would increase efforts to fight terrorism across the Middle East. And they reiterated their pledge to increase defense spending, Trump's main focus going into the meeting.
The decision suggested that Trump is holding back from slashing support for the alliance despite his anger over what he says is Europe's taking advantage of the U.S. security umbrella. But NATO leaders are still concerned that he will make concessions to Russian President Vladimir Putin when they meet on Monday.
How Woodrow Wilson’s Great Blunder Led to Hitler, Lenin, Stalin and World War II
https://fee.org/articles/wilsons-wa...-led-to-hitler-lenin-stalin-and-world-war-ii/
I'm talking about China and Southeast Asia. China herself has already made the move to take control of the South China Sea and they, themselves claim it as an historic property of China. They have hardly left any coastal access to Indonesia, Vietnam, The Phillipines. I suppose if you pressed the point, Korea and Japan are also ancient claims of the Chinese, although the Japanese sent them packing on a few occasions.
http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/ea...proposed-for-chinas-claims-in-south-china-sea
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_in_the_South_China_Sea
By the way, a substantial part of what is now Russia was also tributary to a Chinese Empire that goes six thousand years.
Wilson was a peacenik.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Points
In retrospect, what was needed at the end of WWI was a military occupation of Berlin ... which, by the way, is precisely what eventually happened 40 million dead later.
Yes but that will change , as it has most places .
Have you seen how closely Chinese border claims are hugging the shoreine around the South China Sea? What's the point of that beyond some sort of neo-imperialism?Sorry - your source is pure speculation. Laying the blame on Wilson for events beyond his control is just historical revisionism. The article is riddled with historical errors and suppositions. One example is that the so-called October Revolution could have been prevented if the US had stayed out of the war. At the time there were too few US troops in Europe to have any influence on events in far off Russia. Another is that Germany took no aggressive action toward the US - I suggest you look up Zimmerman Telegram and the German U-boat campaign in the Atlantic.
Actually the Japanese sent the Mongols packing. China for the most part has shown little interest in areas of the world outside of its traditional areas.
And as for Wilson - the article Walter sited contains serious historical errors and engages in unfounded speculation. I've tried to explain this to Walter, but I doubt he will understand.
Exactly what changes do you foresee?
Have you seen how closely Chinese border claims are hugging the shoreine around the South China Sea? What's the point of that beyond some sort of neo-imperialism?