A jurisdiction without ocean frontage would be screwed once they separated. The idea is retarded.
A jurisdiction without ocean frontage would be screwed once they separated. The idea is retarded.
Did you see how many first Nations inhabitants there are, now?
Used to be a lot more.
And there in lies the problem . The New Brunswick beer fiasco is the prime example .We aren't united
We aren't united
I'm sure you'll learn to goose-step eventually.
Gotta be extra tough in snowshoes.
Actually the ENTIRE population if First Nations in all of North America- at the time Columbus arrived- is estimated at about one million- it is white technology and white food production methods that have enabled native populations to grow as they have!
Not that natives would admit such a thing!
Actually the indigenous population was much higher than that. The numbers you are using refer to the population of Canada and the US. But North America also includes Mexico and Central America which is estimated to have had a population in the tens of millions. It is estimated that about 90% of the indigenous population of the Americas died after the arrival of Europeans. And on the subject of food, a large number of modern crops originated in the Americas.
I wonder what BC would do if AB decided to divorce itself from Canuckistan?
More?It would still share a land bridge to the rest of Canada through the Yukon, The NWT, and from there Manitoba. In practical terms though, Canada would probably be wise to promote closer ties with the US to allow BC to trade more with it.
More?
It would still share a land bridge to the rest of Canada through the Yukon, The NWT, and from there Manitoba. In practical terms though, Canada would probably be wise to promote closer ties with the US to allow BC to trade more with it.
Infrastructure is already in place in the US, it would be crazy to attempt to develop rail and highway infrastructure through the North.
All the same, as it would be crossing through the US, there is the risk for tariffs, taxes, etc, but that's BC's problem
Oh- Bar Silly Sister begs to DIFFER as usual- with NOTHING to contribute!
Mexicans may consider themselves part of North America -with good reason- we are talking here about lands that came under the influence of English speaking peoples!
Therefore Bar Silly- your comment is off topic and irrelevant as usual!
Port of Vancouver , and Prince George ,multiple border crossing into the U.S. market place . B.C. is situated perfectly and always has been . After all we were bribed into Canada with the railroad that Canada needed more then B.C.Infrastructure is already in place in the US, it would be crazy to attempt to develop rail and highway infrastructure through the North.
All the same, as it would be crossing through the US, there is the risk for tariffs, taxes, etc, but that's BC's problem
Port of Vancouver , and Prince George ,multiple border crossing into the U.S. market place . B.C. is situated perfectly and always has been . After all we were bribed into Canada with the railroad that Canada needed more then B.C.