Turns out pipelines don't do much for the economy
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
Not to you I guess but you also seem to be unaware that pipelines fall under the 3rd top category.
Do you have too many baristas dragging down in ON's GDP per capita??
BTW that category will be #2 within ten years.
Do you have too many baristas dragging down in ON's GDP per capita??
BTW that category will be #2 within ten years.
You are one confused man.
What? No Ontario?
They are 27th? Wow!
What went so horribly wrong?
Sad ain't it...
Ontario is a joke now.
Yup. Would you invest in Ontario?
From 2008 – 2028.
• The Saskatchewan mineral industry will invest over $50 billion in expansions and new mines.
• This translates to new investments of more than $6 million a day.
• Mining employment (direct, indirect and induced) will see its contribution rise to 17% of total employment or almost 1 in 5 jobs.
• Mining will generate over 286,000 person years of direct employment in construction in operational activity.
• Mining will contribute an additional $9.5 billion per year to provincial GDP.
• Mining will generate $28 billion in provincial revenues or $1.4 billion per year, for a total of over $50 billion.
From 2008 – 2028.
• The Saskatchewan mineral industry will invest over $50 billion in expansions and new mines.
• This translates to new investments of more than $6 million a day.
• Mining employment (direct, indirect and induced) will see its contribution rise to 17% of total employment or almost 1 in 5 jobs.
• Mining will generate over 286,000 person years of direct employment in construction in operational activity.
• Mining will contribute an additional $9.5 billion per year to provincial GDP.
• Mining will generate $28 billion in provincial revenues or $1.4 billion per year, for a total of over $50 billion.
Fact is there should never have been a study in the first place. Should have just built the pipeline and cash would be flowing by now. KM has spent more time bogged down is useless and expensive drama than it took to plan and build the origional line.
Not much of what you post does.
Sitting outside the welfare office complaining about how hard it is with no padded chairs on the sidewalk.
I noticed that the only really important one is left off the list. Working Canadians.
The great Canadian shielded .You are one confused man.
What? No Ontario?
They are 27th? Wow!
What went so horribly wrong?
Neibhour buddy has yard signs supporting no Kinder Morgan , I put up home made sign asking him to shut off his natural gas pipeline . Of course torn down .
And beyond. Crazy amounts of potash in the south and everything a miner's heart could desire in the north.
Trans-Hudson Orogen is my shtick.
Trans-Hudson Orogen is my shtick.
You are one confused man.
What? No Ontario?
They are 27th? Wow!
What went so horribly wrong?
OK - so just build the pipeline to Hudson's Bay.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Where does this idiot come up with this shit? First off dumbass, LA isn't a state. California's economy produces $1 trillion more than the next most productive state in the US, New York.
It's economy is bigger than that of France, India, Italy, Brazil and Canada and just a few hundred billion less than the economies of the UK and Germany. In sheer numbers California has the 6th largest economy in the world.
What makes it seem "poor" is the high cost of living in the state and it's massive debt as a result of gross mismanagement. It's also not a very business friendly environment due to the high cost of doing business there. Hmmm sounds quite a bit like Ontario.
They have pipelines all over the place.
They have pipelines to tidewater already.
But they want more.
In common practice, La.=Louisiana. Officially Its abbreviation is "LA.".
Los Angeles is "L.A.". ( LOL, It didn't sound like you missed your period there, Haha)
just sayin.
https://www.abbreviations.com/abbreviation/Louisiana+
Last edited:
It was re-studied under the new LIB. environmental standards and still passed Harper has no hand in this disaster.