Like I said, they'd better play nice.
When the oil's gone, a have-not region with a history of of "not getting along" will be trying to negotiate re-entry into the Canadian federation. I won't be around to see it but my grandchildren will be.
Like I said, they'd better play nice.
We don't want to be with crybaby Alberta.Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta & B.C. Want To "Separate" From Canada | MTL Blog
Alberta on its own or with BC, and Sask..
Why don’t you like Alberta’s cleaning up the oil spilling into their waterways ?Oil will be obsolete far before all the bitumen in Alberta is gone.
That is precisely why they are all in such a panic.
Alberta and BC, maybe. Alberta alone would be landlocked. If alone, it would need to develop very friendly relations with a neighbouring state that has at least one year-round port. That would be either Canada or the US. From the standpoint of efficiency, given that Vancouver is the nearest port, Canada would be the best bet. In other words, if Alberta wanted to separate, it had better play nice.
It's all Corporate haulers and mainly teamsters.Ship to Seattle ports.. the Interstate via the US is a better road and better access.
I bring up product from Los Angeles ports all the time to Canada. I’ve never pull out of the Vancouver port, not sure what even comes in via that port.. but I’m sure it’s important to Vancouver, just not the rest of Canada.
The BC highways suck
Having the US as our only destination for exported oil is a nasty spot to be in. It pretty much allows them to set the price, especially now since the shale oil boom in that country has put them in a position much less reliant on imported oil. Trump makes no secret that his plan is "US FIrst" when it comes to international trade. We need offshore customers. (That's "We" as in Canadians)
As for the BC NDP's opposition to the Kinder Morgan expansion, I see green spoons stirring that pot. BC Green Party leader Andrew Weaver has John Horgan under his thumb and he knows it.
Like I said, they'd better play nice.
Having the US as our only destination for exported oil is a nasty spot to be in. It pretty much allows them to set the price, especially now since the shale oil boom in that country has put them in a position much less reliant on imported oil. Trump makes no secret that his plan is "US FIrst" when it comes to international trade. We need offshore customers. (That's "We" as in Canadians)
As for the BC NDP's opposition to the Kinder Morgan expansion, I see green spoons stirring that pot. BC Green Party leader Andrew Weaver has John Horgan under his thumb and he knows it.
Alberta clearly needs to export oil to the Pacific Rim. Having a single customer for it is problematic on many levels and the selling price is a big one. Maybe, BC needs to receive a bigger piece of the action. Money has a mysterious ways of talking down everything else.
Churchill has been on the radar for some time relative to a number of industries (resource, agri and aerospace).
Like you said, the infrastructure is there although I understand that the rail capacity has unique challenges (I suspect due to issues related to permafrost)
Churchill has been on the radar for some time relative to a number of industries (resource, agri and aerospace).
Like you said, the infrastructure is there although I understand that the rail capacity has unique challenges (I suspect due to issues related to permafrost)
We don't want to be with crybaby Alberta.
I've lived in BC probably before you were born, punk.
My bad
Then stay in Ontario. WE don't want your kind in the west.
I doubt that. You are not much older than me and I was born here while you brought your freeloader lifestyle with you from Quebec where freeloading off the taxpayer was invented.
Muskeg
Two lines would be needed. A Heavy year round line and the current light line that heavy freight can only be shipped in winter.
The light line can haul empties back in summer.