The next jury would be just as tired of gangs as the last.
Move to North Battleford and make it happen.
North Battleford, a city of 14,400, has the highest overall score in the country in Statistics Canada's 2016 Crime Severity Index. The city previously had the country's worst rate for violent crime, but saw an eight per cent reduction in that type of crime in 2016. The city's violent crime score is now second highest in the country.
With a 15 per cent increase in non-volent crime in 2016, though, North Battleford still leads the country in the rate for those crimes.
Double Jeopary. An appeal requires fresh evidence without using anything from the 1st trial.
That's why it it's called a jury of your peers.
Oh good Lord. Trudeau is live on the tube crying for for a dead gangbanger saying "I'm not going mention what led up to the shooting but" ...boohoo poor Injuns.
F-ck you Trudeau.
The Crown will have to appeal this. Nothing to do with Trudeau, whatsoever (or the Indians, either). You cannot kill people to protect your property here in Canada, pretty much anywhere in the US, anywhere that adheres to Common law in the world. Just because a jury found him innocent does not mean that they are right. Also, there is no "double jeopardy" law in Canada so the Crown can charge him over and over for this same killing if and when new evidence comes along. This is far from over.
The Crown will have to appeal this. Nothing to do with Trudeau, whatsoever (or the Indians, either). You cannot kill people to protect your property here in Canada, pretty much anywhere in the US, anywhere that adheres to Common law in the world. Just because a jury found him innocent does not mean that they are right. Also, there is no "double jeopardy" law in Canada so the Crown can charge him over and over for this same killing if and when new evidence comes along. This is far from over.
There are many grounds for appeal.
I'm sure they will put their pointy little heads together and come up with something.
The Crown will have to appeal this. Nothing to do with Trudeau, whatsoever (or the Indians, either). You cannot kill people to protect your property here in Canada, pretty much anywhere in the US, anywhere that adheres to Common law in the world. Just because a jury found him innocent does not mean that they are right. Also, there is no "double jeopardy" law in Canada so the Crown can charge him over and over for this same killing if and when new evidence comes along. This is far from over.
But what if the accused feared a life was being threatened?
When are people going to get it through their heads that this is not a racial issue? What would anyone with an I.Q. of 5 think could happen when you go driving on to private property pissed to the eye balls & armed to the teeth, with criminal intentions (stealing)?
Shoot first, ask questions later. A bunch of of Saskatchewan farmers say "It's okay".
The law of treeless jungle ...
Armchair SJW jurors always know better than the jurors sitting in the courtroom don't you know,,......But what if the accused feared a life was being threatened?
When are people going to get it through their heads that this is not a racial issue? What would anyone with an I.Q. of 5 think could happen when you go driving on to private property pissed to the eye balls & armed to the teeth, with criminal intentions (stealing)?
Steal first and pray you don't get shot second.
its the government we are talking about.Not if they have anything resembling a brain in their tiny bureaucratic heads.
All appealing this will do is put another jury in the box, to hear the same evidence.
What could possibly make them think another 12 individuals would unanimously come up with a verdict completely opposite that of the first 12?
Another trial would simply end up enraging the Native community even more, and keep the anger boiling for the full length of another trial.
It would be so, so stupid.