Jagmeet Singh is a hypocrite
- Thread starter AMKiller
- Start date
Now, now.....no need to get nasty about deeds done long ago by Muslims...though it is true that the son of Mohamed was murdered by enemines with the ranks of the Faithful- not everybody wanted an automatic coronation of the kid- hence the Shi-ite and Sunni troubles- still arguing 1600 years later about some poor victim of MUslim terror!
But we Christians cannot be too smug- we have The Spanish Inquisition to live down. But these are events from the past- and we all share some shame. The trouble is what is happening NOW! And that hypocrite Jagmeet Singh is feeding on Islamophobia for the sake of buying votes- he should be ashamed to be so deceitful- since he presents himself as one of the Khalsa- THE PURE!!
Consider:
Here is an article illustrating the sort of reverse racist crap being taught by over priced college and university profs! With some comments of my own in brackets):
Heckler targeting Jagmeet Singh reminder racism exists in Canada: Prof
THE CANADIAN PRESS
FIRST POSTED: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 07:37 AM EDT | UPDATED: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 07:51 AM EDT
A political science professor says a racist heckler that interrupted a campaign rally for NDP leadership hopeful Jagmeet Singh is an example of the discrimination that deters minorities from politics.
A video posted on YouTube of Singh’s campaign event in Brampton last week shows a woman interrupting his speech and accusing him of supporting Shariah law and the Muslim Brotherhood.
(The Muslim Brotherhood has been banned in most European countries and its even banned in some Muslim countries for their racist and violent policies. If Singh refuses to condemn them then HE is the bigot! As for the Cdn woman and her fears of Sharia Law-why would a woman not be concerned since Sharia Law will- if implemented here- turn her into a second class person in her own country of birth! So if Singh is the great supporter of tolerance and democracy that he claims to be then why would he not speak against Sharia Law- the Muslim system of belief and law that will erase about half of our Cdn constitution? How can he be silent in the face of such a threat? Unless either he supports it or he is so desperate to get elected that he is willing to sell us out in exchange for Muslim votes?)
Singh, who is Sikh, responds to the woman saying he supports and loves her, and that he won’t be intimidated by hate.
(And he is apparently mesmerized by Muslim voters as well?)
“Everyone in this room loves you, we all support you, we believe in your rights,” he said as she continued yelling at him in front of a crowd of supporters.
(Yeah, he supports her unless it costs him votes then she is GONE!)
Erin Tolley, an associate professor at the University of Toronto, said the incident is a reminder that although Canada promotes multiculturalism, racist views are still prevalent.
(Oh- LIE-berals will now tell us it is racist to fear major changes mandated by a Muslim minority that erase our civil rights!)
“I think one danger in Canada is we become very congratulatory about our multiculturalism ... but to some extent that conceals the number of Canadians that harbour racist sentiments,” she said.
(Muslims of the Cdn Caliphate have told us that “Sharia Law is the most perfect system and that we are sinning to deny this”! Muslim radicals see nothing wrong with wiping out much of our constitution and major chunks of our culture and civil rights just to satisfy their personal religious preferences- where is the tolerance in that?)
Tolley said studies have shown about 30 per cent of Canadians hold racist opinions and while they may not all be vocal about their views, it does influence how they vote.
(Our LIE-beral govt has repeatedly told us that Canada is a hotbed of racists and yet there are huge numbers of non white people here- from many cultures and yet LIE-berals regularly get elected in spite of those bigots. How does that happen unless LIE-berals and their allies are selling us FAKE NEWS about Cdn tolerance- for the sake of buying votes regardless of what is best for the country?)
In her research on race and politics, she said discrimination against minorities, gender and people’s sexual orientation can give them pause about whether they want to enter or continue in politics.
(Yeah- I bet thats right- its enough to turn your stomach watching politicians twisting themselves in HYPOCRITE knots for the sake of votes at any price!)
“I’m working on a study right now talking to people who had ran for the nomination of their party and many candidates of colour were somewhat surprised by what a negative experience it was, and so they are thinking twice about whether they want to continue,” she said.
Singh’s ability to keep calm and respond in a positive manner to the heckler is evidence that it wasn’t the first time he experienced outwardly racist remarks, Tolley said.
(Yes- Singh presented hs hypocrite view with style and grace- but FOOLED NOBODY!)
Although it was a negative incident, she said it did allow Singh to show off his leadership skills and raise his profile across the country.
(Gosh, I would say the event showed Singhs two faced effrontery rather than any real signs of fair play and justice! Singh is NOT the guy to turn to for an honest defense of democracy and capitalism!)
The point is Muslims emulate Mohammad to this very day. Today's terrorist acts are recent and not from long ago.
The Inquisition and the Crusades were responses to Muslim conquests of Europe. Seems everyone forgets this.
Agreed on your other points.
spilledthebeer gets would up and rambles. Stay focused on your questions and don't let him or his alter egos confuse you.
---
What most people do not understand about Islam, or more particularly, the spread of Islam, is that the Crusades and most of the other battles were a reaction to Muslims attacking first in an attempt to spread their belief system. This is standard. What must be understood is that very few European military operations were attacks on Muslim territiry. They were defensive, meant to push them back.
Dr. Bill Warner made this map. It will explain things. If you wish to understand Islam better, his readings should be part of your library.
edited to add: The word kafir means unbelievers. Non-Muslims.
[youtube]I_To-cV94Bo[/youtube]
Thanks for that.
Muslims hide and lie about their history. Muslims attacked Christian Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Spain, the Balkans, Constantinople, Sicily and Lebanon forcing conversion onto the people of these once Christian lands. They took slaves from these lands. In India, during 800 years of Muslim Moghul reign, 400 million Hindus and Sikhs were slaughtered. The Ottomans slaughtered a million Armenians, yet we never here of these genocides.
I'm afraid Muslims are smarter than most left wing morons and the downfall of the west will be because of these apologists.
Considering that no statistics were kept in ancient times of actual deaths you have to take those figures with a grain of salt. Especially the 400 million number.
So maybe it was 200 million or maybe it was 600 million. The point is not many people know of the biggest genocide in history because Muslims lie about their history.
It was not in ancient times, Islam wasn't around in ancient times. This was between approximately 1000ad to 1857ad.
https://www.sikhnet.com/news/islamic-india-biggest-holocaust-world-history
We know how many died in the Armenian genocide yet Muslims don't acknowledge this mass murder.
Last edited:
Difference is, the Church has admitted these crimes and apologized for them while Muslims don't acknowledge any of their atrocities.
A patch work of neighbourhoods divided by religion, skin colour and whatever else indeed represents a well thought out road map for national cohesion. Splinter groups each with their own interest at heart represent very fragile building blocks from which to construct a nation. The muslim movement has done really well in supplying their distinct building blocks that are incompatable with all others making cohesion really challenging. I've always felt compromise can solve any issue whilst pigheadedness ever leads to conflict.
That is because, by definition, an atrocity is 'an extremely wicked or cruel act'. When Muslims are engaged in killing kaffir (infidels, non-believers), it is obeying religious doctrine, not an atrocity. They would deny and probably laugh if you suggested that.
What would be defined as an atrocity is dependent on which side you support.
Last edited:
Ah. He's a guy who is running to be the leader of the NDP. IMO, it doesn't matter if he is chosen or not. The NDP will not form the next government. It would surprise me if the NDP elected enough members to be an effective body in Ottawa. You can read about him here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagmeet_Singh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagmeet_Singh
Yes, in that department, he rivals Justin. His beard needs a trim though.
Just cosmetic stuff, not much substance!
Justin doesn't have much substance, but he's PM. Why can't Jagmeet get elected the same way?
I can see it now. CTV. Capital Beat: Political Fashion. What's In?
Does Armani scream substance in Parliament?
What are MPs wearing this fall?
Political Insider: Pastels or Grey for Andrew Sheer?
The Liberal Cabinet in Turmoil! Plain or Striped Ties?
Orange accessories for the Ladies of the NDP
I can see it now. CTV. Capital Beat: Political Fashion. What's In?
Does Armani scream substance in Parliament?
What are MPs wearing this fall?
Political Insider: Pastels or Grey for Andrew Sheer?
The Liberal Cabinet in Turmoil! Plain or Striped Ties?
Orange accessories for the Ladies of the NDP
Everyone lies about their history. The point is that those figures seem to have been pulled out of the air. Using anti-Muslim Sikhs as a source is rather questionable.