The supreme court ruling did not say anything about the Canadian Government having an obligation to get him out of gitmo.They should have got him out of gitmo YEARS before they did. As in the first year he was in there. They didn't, they broke their own laws, they pay.
Supreme Court of Canada repatriation ruling: In January 2010, in a unanimous 9–0 decision, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the participation of Canadian officials in Khadr's interrogations at Guantanamo clearly violated his rights under the Charter. These interrogations occurred in February 2003 under the Cretien Liberals who were in power at that time, by Canadian Foreign Affairs intelligence officer Jim Gould and an official from CSIS.
The Supreme Court, however, stopped short of ordering the government to seek Khadr's return to Canada. It left it to the government to determine how to exercise its duty to conduct foreign affairs while also upholding its obligation to respect Khadr's constitutional rights.
He didn't just plead guilty to murder, although that was a biggie.I'll ask you, aside from the coerced guilty plea, what evidence do you have that he killed anyone.
What counter-evidence can you provide that those bombs he was building and placing in the video didn't do their job and go off? What proof do you have that the bombs he placed didn't kill someone...maybe even an unsuspecting innocent bystander or family? What evidence can you provide that counters the the charges and subsequent conviction of murder in violation of the laws of war, attempted murder in violation of the laws of war, conspiracy, or the two counts of providing material support for terrorism and spying that he plead guilty to? Do you think the video and photos are faked like some here who are supporting their self-delusional ideas??
His guilt was established through a confession, accepted by both the prosecution and defense in the face of overwhelming evidence against him.
Last edited: