New Ontario Impaired Laws are another cash grab for the Insurance Folks
- Thread starter Retired_Can_Soldier
- Start date
No it doesn't. It has to do with getting behind the wheel when you are a danger to others. It's about spending massive amounts of taxpayers dollars trying to address a problem that may or may not exist. It's politicians need to tell us they are doing something for us.
But WHY does he advertise it to the whole wide world? I guess it must be possible to be too f**king numb to feel shame!
Since seniors are clearly impaired due to age and yet are not statistically more hazardous then the general population, the direct link between minor impairment and hazard cannot be made. While you simpletons have a hard-on against impaired drivers, I simply want to eliminate hazards. I understand you don't quite understand the difference. Most people don't. That's why politicians can continue telling people that it's a worthwhile cause to spend millions every year, ruin people's lives and get very little benefit. Now, you're a Trudeau supporter so it's understandable that you would support a reckless and wasteful use of taxpayers dollars however some of the other simpletons claim to be conservative so it kind of boggles the mind
roflmfao.... problem with your premise...is.... I'm not a Trudeau supporter.
You just keep getting stupider and stupider......
Every time cannuck get on a thread it gets derailed by him saying something stupid, having it pointed out to him and then proving the fact he is stupid by posting more stupidity.
Of course you are...Not that it's really relevant.
If one of you simpletons could actually provide any data that shows that a driver at 0.05 is a greater risk than a senior or a shift worker, I would reconsider my position. Clearly you can't so you have to fall back to your default silliness.
That's just the schtick of your common garden troll ... and he keeps getting fed
You'll keep denying anyhow. It helps with the post count - as if it matters
Just keep driving drunk. Then, you can be one of your own precious statistics
Like I said, more silliness. If a shift worker is impaired by lack of sleep to the same level as driver with a BAC of 0.08, shouldn't the concern and the response be similar?
I was wondering when the king of trolls would show up
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11538713
Night Shift Workers Are At An increased Risk For Car Crashes, Even During Daytime Commute
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9562992
The government will sanction somebody that blows 0.05 and yet knowingly promotes the shift work culture that leads to even greater impairment.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11538713
Night Shift Workers Are At An increased Risk For Car Crashes, Even During Daytime Commute
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9562992
The government will sanction somebody that blows 0.05 and yet knowingly promotes the shift work culture that leads to even greater impairment.
Last edited:
wrong, again.... you really are starting off 2017 in a bad way.
A peace officer may immediately suspend a person’s driver’s licence for 24 hours if the officer reasonably suspects that the driver: • Has a medical or physical condition ( WHICH INCLUDES FATIGUE OR LACK OF SLEEP) that affects the driver’s physical or mental ability, or, •
Are you tired or impaired behind the wheel alberta has the immediate …
now, you were babbling about things not being even or consistent?
maybe you should sit this one, and probably many more, out untill you can bring your education up to snuff to be able to converse with the big boys.