Let's pick on Hillary (Her Thighness)
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
Bill's Wife
By Kate on May 25, 2016 6:51 PM | 3 Comments
She better not drop any further in the polls...
By Kate on May 25, 2016 6:51 PM | 3 Comments
She better not drop any further in the polls...
The report is devastating, although it transparently strains to soften the blow. For example, it concludes that State's "longstanding systemic weaknesses" in recordkeeping "go well beyond the tenure of any one Secretary of State." Yet, it cannot avoid finding that Clinton's misconduct is singular in that she, unlike her predecessors, systematically used private e-mail for the purpose of evading recordkeeping requirements.
State IG Finds Clinton Violated Records Rules Refused To Cooperate | National Review
Clinton expressed worries about exposure of personal emails at State Dept. - POLITICO
State IG Finds Clinton Violated Records Rules Refused To Cooperate | National Review
Clinton expressed worries about exposure of personal emails at State Dept. - POLITICO
Boys are always boys talloola. You should know that girl.
I think Hillary]s a good looking woman. All she needs is a good old boy.
Hillary, hold firm your campaign promise that said
“I oppose the TPP agreement — and that means before and after the election.”
Ignore your "advisors" and "strategists" at CNAS (Center for a New American Security) who report to you and (all) the rest of us the necessity of implementing TPP in its strategic paper of May 16, 2016, "EXTENDING AMERICAN POWER; Strategies to Expand U.S. Engagement in a Competitive World Order" you see at www.cnas.org/... which in part prominently says:
"...we urge Congress to take up, consider, and approve the TPP as soon as possible."
This Paper, the final report from CNAS Extending American Power (EAP) Project, is bad advice even though so many of your best friends have signed it.
Ignore them all telling you:
This Paper, the final report from CNAS Extending American Power (EAP) Project, is bad advice even though so many of your best friends have signed it.
Ignore them all telling you:
"Failure to pass the TPP will send a message to Asia and the world that the United States is simply too internally divided and inward looking to appreciate the value of such a vast regional trade arrangement. In the case of failure, China would also have a much freer hand in writing economic rules of the road in Asia. Over the longer term, a successful the TPP will serve as a standard-setter to encourage reform throughout the region."
We all know your best friend and mentor, CNAS Director Emeritus Madeleine K. Albright wants Obama and you to push through TPP. Nonetheless it remains to be that the best advice you can heed is the really clear message from the vast majority of U.S. citizenry who admonish you to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. You see, it’s the voice of a movement which is of course much more significant than a mere collection of electors.
Similarly, if you ascend to our national presidency, do not do every item in this First 100 Days Agenda of May 20, 2016 especially refraining from taking the “advice” to:
“...[...]… the new administration should announce that it is opening up discussions with other regional actors, including Indonesia and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as well as other actors such as South Korea and Taiwan” ...[...]…
thereby making the precipitous expansion of TPP.
What a terrible idea! Avoid confusing a victory in electoral politics, should you prevail, with a victory in movement politics which you are finding this campaign season does not favor your many primary victories. The burgeoning movement opposing TPP, TTIP and the like is global. The movement against TPP stiffly flies in the face of neoliberal policies.
TPP is an affront to people who move against racism and toward social justice, as well as moving against environmental racism, pollution impacts and deleterious health effects in communities of color, toward improved risk assessment, for promotion and implementation of stronger rather than weaker community responses to environmental threats, against pollution in developing nations, for indigenous peoples, and against climate change that is slowly yet assuredly killing us all. In other words, and more simply put: Ms. Clinton, join us in the movement to further environmental justice: Oppose TPP & TTIP including "lame duck" Congressional session TPP passage. [and see: TPP in Recent News]
We all know your best friend and mentor, CNAS Director Emeritus Madeleine K. Albright wants Obama and you to push through TPP. Nonetheless it remains to be that the best advice you can heed is the really clear message from the vast majority of U.S. citizenry who admonish you to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. You see, it’s the voice of a movement which is of course much more significant than a mere collection of electors.
Similarly, if you ascend to our national presidency, do not do every item in this First 100 Days Agenda of May 20, 2016 especially refraining from taking the “advice” to:
“...[...]… the new administration should announce that it is opening up discussions with other regional actors, including Indonesia and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as well as other actors such as South Korea and Taiwan” ...[...]…
thereby making the precipitous expansion of TPP.
What a terrible idea! Avoid confusing a victory in electoral politics, should you prevail, with a victory in movement politics which you are finding this campaign season does not favor your many primary victories. The burgeoning movement opposing TPP, TTIP and the like is global. The movement against TPP stiffly flies in the face of neoliberal policies.
TPP is an affront to people who move against racism and toward social justice, as well as moving against environmental racism, pollution impacts and deleterious health effects in communities of color, toward improved risk assessment, for promotion and implementation of stronger rather than weaker community responses to environmental threats, against pollution in developing nations, for indigenous peoples, and against climate change that is slowly yet assuredly killing us all. In other words, and more simply put: Ms. Clinton, join us in the movement to further environmental justice: Oppose TPP & TTIP including "lame duck" Congressional session TPP passage. [and see: TPP in Recent News]
Hillary, hold firm your campaign promise that said“I oppose the TPP agreement — and that means before and after the election.”Ignore your "advisors" and "strategists" at CNAS (Center for a New American Security) who report to you and (all) the rest of us the necessity of implementing TPP in its strategic paper of May 16, 2016, "EXTENDING AMERICAN POWER; Strategies to Expand U.S. Engagement in a Competitive World Order" you see at www.cnas.org/... which in part prominently says:
"...we urge Congress to take up, consider, and approve the TPP as soon as possible."
This Paper, the final report from CNAS Extending American Power (EAP) Project, is bad advice even though so many of your best friends have signed it.
Ignore them all telling you:"Failure to pass the TPP will send a message to Asia and the world that the United States is simply too internally divided and inward looking to appreciate the value of such a vast regional trade arrangement. In the case of failure, China would also have a much freer hand in writing economic rules of the road in Asia. Over the longer term, a successful the TPP will serve as a standard-setter to encourage reform throughout the region."
We all know your best friend and mentor, CNAS Director Emeritus Madeleine K. Albright wants Obama and you to push through TPP. Nonetheless it remains to be that the best advice you can heed is the really clear message from the vast majority of U.S. citizenry who admonish you to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. You see, it’s the voice of a movement which is of course much more significant than a mere collection of electors.
Similarly, if you ascend to our national presidency, do not do every item in this First 100 Days Agenda of May 20, 2016 especially refraining from taking the “advice” to:
“...[...]… the new administration should announce that it is opening up discussions with other regional actors, including Indonesia and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as well as other actors such as South Korea and Taiwan” ...[...]…
thereby making the precipitous expansion of TPP.
What a terrible idea! Avoid confusing a victory in electoral politics, should you prevail, with a victory in movement politics which you are finding this campaign season does not favor your many primary victories. The burgeoning movement opposing TPP, TTIP and the like is global. The movement against TPP stiffly flies in the face of neoliberal policies.
TPP is an affront to people who move against racism and toward social justice, as well as moving against environmental racism, pollution impacts and deleterious health effects in communities of color, toward improved risk assessment, for promotion and implementation of stronger rather than weaker community responses to environmental threats, against pollution in developing nations, for indigenous peoples, and against climate change that is slowly yet assuredly killing us all. In other words, and more simply put: Ms. Clinton, join us in the movement to further environmental justice: Oppose TPP & TTIP including "lame duck" Congressional session TPP passage. [and see: TPP in Recent News]
No wonder Trump is set to win when the left is still busy trying to destroy the economy with garbage like this.
From a Canadian perspective we have the Cons and Libs supporting TPP so we are almost doomed to it.
I'm not sure Trump would cancel it but there would be riots in the streets from his supporters if he doesn't. As for Hillary I would be stunned if she didn't support it.
The following short video would be funny if it wasn't true...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkVe7arGLW0
Q: Do you know if this setup would have been any different from the setup of other employees?
A: Yes, this would have been different.
Q: How would it have been different?
A: My understanding is that most of the employees’ computers in the State Department are connected through the State Department’s OpenNet e-mail system …
Q: So this would have been separate from the OpenNet system?
A: Correct.
A: She wouldn’t have had a password.
Q: So the computer would have just been open and be able to use without going through any security features?
A: Correct.
First "Shocking" Deposition In Clinton Email Case Reveals She Did Not Use A Password | Zero Hedge
A: Yes, this would have been different.
Q: How would it have been different?
A: My understanding is that most of the employees’ computers in the State Department are connected through the State Department’s OpenNet e-mail system …
Q: So this would have been separate from the OpenNet system?
A: Correct.
A: She wouldn’t have had a password.
Q: So the computer would have just been open and be able to use without going through any security features?
A: Correct.
First "Shocking" Deposition In Clinton Email Case Reveals She Did Not Use A Password | Zero Hedge
There's not a candidate running with the integrity, character and honor to lead 330 million people as their President. Not one.
Disagree. Munster displayed about the same degree of maturity and integrity as the rest of the cut throats.