Logic doesn't work on that one....;-):roll:
Actually it does. 1968 was the year drug use started running rampant!
Logic doesn't work on that one....;-):roll:
I was referring to BB not pg.....Actually it does. 1968 was the year drug use started running rampant!
Get a JOB?? I have worked from the age of 11 until the age of 64. Unlike most males, I worked 8 hours at a job I loved and then did work on our dairy farm afterwards. Over and above that did the cooking, laundry, housekeeping for the family. It is men like you who have it easy. You have way too much time on your hands. People like you make me sick with your bleeding complaints about your blooming dangerous toys and having to actually follow a few rules to use them!!Hey, Welfare is not supposed to be a career choice. Get a job.
LOL......It is not Boomer who is beating a dead horse, it is me.......over and over and over and over and over. If I disagree, I must be a welfare recipient, or illogical, or dumb, and anything else that flits through the dimly lit brains of those who cannot find a decent rebuttal or cannot stick to the subject.Boomer....doesn't it fee like you're......
..............................................................![]()
So the hippies on 4th Ave.and in Gastown are the cause ?Actually it does. 1968 was the year drug use started running rampant!
So the hippies on 4th Ave.and in Gastown are the cause ?
Are Haight and Ashbury in Vancouver ? And was that area of San Francisco a particularly violent area other than during anti Vietnam riots ?Stupid f**king question! Was 4th Ave. the only place where drugs were running rampant? Weren't Hate and Ashbury similarly involved?
Are Haight and Ashbury in Vancouver ? And was that area of San Francisco a particularly violent area other than during anti Vietnam riots ?
Taken from the previous link I posted.......Your rare selections of what you think as an excuse to allow a loosening of gun control laws in Canada, are as senseless as sticking a bandaid on arterial wound.Another example of guns saving lives
MAN SHOOTS, KILLS ALLEGED HOME INVADER TO SAVE WOMAN, BABY
![]()
On May 11, a man in Gwinnett County, Georgia, shot and killed an alleged home invader and injured another to protect a mother and baby.
The incident occurred around “just before midnight.”
According to AJC.com, the man told police he retrieved his gun after seeing the suspects “walking across his back patio.” Shortly thereafter, he heard a knock at his front door and, when he answered it, the suspects “asked him to step outside”
The man told them he did not want to step outside. Gwinnett police Cpl. Michele Pihera recounted what happened next:
When the victim said that he was not interested in stepping outside, that’s when the suspects forced their way inside the home. One of them was wearing a mask and one was armed with a bat. Inside the home was the victim’s family, a female and a small infant.
Once the men were inside, the man fired “at least two rounds,” striking one of the alleged invaders in the chest, killing him. Another suspect–32-year-old John Michael Bush–was also shot, but his wounds were not life-threatening.
Police arrested Bush when he showed up at a hospital for treatment. A third suspect was also apprehended at the hospital. Police believe he may have driven Bush for treatment.
The man claimed he saw a fourth suspect “limping” away from the scene. Police searched but did not find him.
source: Man Shoots, Kills Alleged Home Invader to Save Woman, Baby
Not at all because you are missing the elephant in the room . What else changed during the 1970's ?The points you've raised so far are non sequiturs. Pot is only one of many drugs and perhaps one of the least harmful!![]()
Not at all because you are missing the elephant in the room . What else changed during the 1970's ?
We have had Vietnamese gangs killing fighting and killing .
then came the Russian and Columbians .
Many South Asian gangs .
Lately the Iranians have been in the news .
Get the point .
Taken from the previous link I posted.......Your rare selections of what you think as an excuse to allow a loosening of gun control laws in Canada, are as senseless as sticking a bandaid on arterial wound
Let me explain this to you in a very simple way.. regardless of the Canadian Laws regarding guns, there are 1000's of people in Canada that still own 'unregistered' hand guns and rifles..
The laws mean nothing..
So would you prefer having a bunch of illegal guns in Canada, or would you prefer to know where those guns are?? Loosing the regulations allow people to come forward out of the shadows.
Illegal gun market booming in British Columbia
Illegal guns in Ottawa smuggled from several U.S. states
RCMP estimate over a million unregistered guns in Canada.
(Enjoy your false security)
You are not going to regulate criminals by passing laws- that what jails are for.