New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria

[captain morgan]

Great, we're on the same page then... The IPCC and truther crowd have no proof that AGW even exists, let alone is a problem.

I guess that we can now move on from the incessant demands of bank transfers to alleviate something that doesn't exist

 

[petros]

Climate doesn't change. It was supposed to stay at the coldest point in the Holocene forever and ever and ever.

 

[taxslave]

Climate doesn't change. It was supposed to stay at the coldest point in the Holocene forever and ever and ever.

FUK THAT. We want it to warm up.

 

[waldo]

you keep nattering on about the Medieval Warming Period (MWP):

- notwithstanding warming of today's relatively recent period is warmer than the MWP

- notwithstanding there is no scientific acceptance that the MWP was global... that it was anything more than a regional localized event

- don't hesitate to provide your support and substantiation to draw an equivalency between the causes of warming attributed to the MWP period and the warming of today's relatively recent period.

still waiting petros... still waiting!

what you ignored is the delineation I pointedly made between a small number of persons/scientists making predictions versus predictions/positions made and held by formalized scientific bodies/institutions.

The two scientific bodies (earth sciences) I have membership in take no stance on AGW but don't deny it's warming and make no claims why it's warming.

The Geological Society of America

Climate Change Adopted in October 2006; revised April 2010; March 2013

Position Statement

Decades of scientific research have shown that climate can change from both natural and anthropogenic causes. The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2011), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse-gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s. If current trends continue, the projected increase in global temperature by the end of the twenty-first century will result in significant impacts on humans and other species. Addressing the challenges posed by climate change will require a combination of adaptation to the changes that are likely to occur and global reductions of CO2 emissions from anthropogenic sources.
​

 

[petros]

Medival warm period? Son, you are way off. You have no idea what the Holocene is do you?

 

[waldo]

Medival warm period? Son, you are way off. You have no idea what the Holocene is do you?

are you dancing again? When you refer to "the last AGW"... when you speak to "800 years or so ago"... just what event were you speaking to?

and... and... you have nothing to say about that GSA climate change position statement? Seeing as you claimed 2 organizations (you didn't name) that you belong to take no causal position... I find it most convenient for you to ignore the GSA position statement I put forward - go figure!

 

[DaSleeper]

 

[taxslave]

still waiting petros... still waiting!

​

The Geological Society of America

Climate Change Adopted in October 2006; revised April 2010; March 2013

Position Statement

Decades of scientific research have shown that climate can change from both natural and anthropogenic causes. The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2011), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse-gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s. If current trends continue, the projected increase in global temperature by the end of the twenty-first century will result in significant impacts on humans and other species. Addressing the challenges posed by climate change will require a combination of adaptation to the changes that are likely to occur and global reductions of CO2 emissions from anthropogenic sources.
​

In there is a big IF. IF the trend continues. IF their computer models are accurate, which has proven not to be the case. The one fact is that IPCC and others have manipulated data to suit their conclusions.

 

[waldo]

right on cue lapper! :mrgreen:

 

[DaSleeper]

Have you ever wondered why you are so well liked by everybody?

 

[waldo]

In there is a big IF. IF the trend continues. IF their computer models are accurate, which has proven not to be the case. The one fact is that IPCC and others have manipulated data to suit their conclusions.

don't hesitate to speak directly to the models and related inaccuracy you're claiming... the specifics. Sure you can!

equally, what data manipulation are you claiming the IPCC has done? Or your broad, generalized "others" has done? Sure you can, taxi... sure you can!

watch the taxi peel away now! :mrgreen:

Have you ever wondered why you are so well liked by everybody?

I appreciate you live and die based on the perceived "likeness" you have with your anonymous clubhouse crew! These last posts of yours... is this you adding to the thread content... is this you speaking to the thread OP/subject related discussion? :mrgreen: Lapdogs do what lapdogs do!

 

[taxslave]

don't hesitate to speak directly to the models and related inaccuracy you're speaking to... the specifics. Sure you can!

equally, what data manipulation are you claiming the IPCC has done? Or your broad, generalized "others" has done? Sure you can, taxi... sure you can!

watch the taxi peel away now! :mrgreen:

Don't be obtuse. It is a fact that IPCC and East Anglia among others got caught manipulating data and computer projections have not proven out. Face the facts, you are praying to a false god.

 

[waldo]

Don't be obtuse. It is a fact that IPCC and East Anglia among others got caught manipulating data and computer projections have not proven out. Face the facts, you are praying to a false god.

again, per your claimed facts: what data manipulation did the IPCC get "caught" at? Did, as you say, "East Anglia" get "caught" at?

what computer projections are you speaking to?

 

[taxslave]

: Lapdogs do what lapdogs do!

You have certainly proved that to be true. Get your puppy treat yet today?

 

[waldo]

You have certainly proved that to be true. Get your puppy treat yet today?

you're ignoring the questions/challenges put to you to step-up and detail your claimed facts - is this you peeling away taxi? :mrgreen:

 

[taxslave]

All of this has been posted before in this and other threads you have read. DOn't deny the facts.

 

[waldo]

All of this has been posted before in this and other threads you have read. DOn't deny the facts.

and there it is! :mrgreen: The ever present, ever ready taxi go-to!!! As taxi has done now a brazillion times over: "It's all been posted before... I'm certainly not going to reinvent the wheel"!

 

[taxslave]

and there it is! :mrgreen: The ever present, ever ready taxi go-to!!! As taxi has done now a brazillion times over: "It's all been posted before... I'm certainly not going to reinvent the wheel"!

You realize of course that we are laughing AT you, not with you?

 

[waldo]

You realize of course that we are laughing AT you, not with you?

I could give a rats-patooey what the likes of you and your ilk think or presume to laugh at! Hasn't that registered with you yet... by now?

now quit avoiding the questions/challenges put to you. The TaxiPeelAwayProtocol in full gear! :mrgreen:

 

[EagleSmack]

tard