New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria

[petros]

Goo looking....

 

[Zipperfish]

well look at that. You and I agree on something. I really can't see where I could argue with you on the above.

It's amazing the level of agreement on climate change once we take off our political blinders. Me included.

 

[petros]

Did Politicians argue 600 years ago about glôbal warming? What about when it rapidly cooled 450 years ago? Did they have **** fits?

How about the Roman Senate did they freak out and make deals with the Greeks when it got cold really fast?

 

[skookumchuck]

But you do argue against the warming. That's why you are always going on about the antarctic ice (I think the sea ice around antarctica is growing to record proportions) or have threads about global cooling, or go on and on about NASA fudged numbers whenever presented with any evidence of warming.

otherwise these threads would have people saying "Sure it's warming but it's natural." But if you read through it, most of the deniers deny any warming whatsoever.



No this is put together by the NPCC Nongervnemtnal Panel on Claimte Change or something. That's the website you got it from.

WTF are you talking about? I have said nothing about Antarctic ice or NASA numbers.

 

[taxslave]

yes, until you respond you will remain positioned... and labeled as a denier. Again, it's a simple question you refuse to answer... I'll ask once more: do you accept that the principal causal tie to the relatively recent warming is one attributed to anthropogenic sources - yes or no? It's a very simple question requiring a single word response from you... one you repeatedly ignore and refuse to answer. Go figure, hey!

NO. Sheer BS promoted by a small group that wants to destroy our way of life by giving massive amounts of our money to have not and probably never will have countries. You bought into the scam hook line and sinker.
This is simply climate changing as it has always done. We should all be focusing on cleaning up our act by building with best available technology and practices.
If you really want to save the planet the single best thing to do is stop population growth.

 

[Zipperfish]

Did Politicians argue 600 years ago about glôbal warming? What about when it rapidly cooled 450 years ago? Did they have **** fits?

How about the Roman Senate did they freak out and make deals with the Greeks when it got cold really fast?

The difference this time is that we are trapping more heat in the troposphere due to emissions of CO2, which are much higher than they have been at any of those times.

WTF are you talking about? I have said nothing about Antarctic ice or NASA numbers.

Deniers. They love to deny.

 

[taxslave]

It's capping and trading.

Is that the same as fudging the numbers?

 

[petros]

The difference this time is that we are trapping more heat in the troposphere due to emissions of CO2, which are much higher than they have been at any of those times.



Deniers. They love to deny.

More than the Vikings and more than Egyptians then Romans? What did they do to force the cooling that lead to the alpine glaciers we get to watch melt away today?

Find me one temp spike during any one of the 17 plus interglacials we have data on that didn't end with a wicked drop in temperature.

This planet has an awesome cooling system comprised of water.

 

[Zipperfish]

More than the Vikings and more than Egyptians then Romans? .

yes. that's the whole point. The CO2 levels. That's the whole basis of the theory.

 

[petros]

The jar theory expecting jar results.

 

[skookumchuck]

The difference this time is that we are trapping more heat in the troposphere due to emissions of CO2, which are much higher than they have been at any of those times.



Deniers. They love to deny.

Don't blather, show me where i said that, you idiot.

 

[Zipperfish]

The jar theory expecting jar results.

Spectral physics is even more widely accetped than climate change. It has hundreds of applications everyday, from microwave ovens to medical diagnostics to lasers to chemistry, It's fudnamental to quantum phsycis. To be honest, you're the first person claiming to be a scientist I've ever met who doesn't accept it.

Don't blather, show me where i said that, you idiot.

Isn't what the "bull" in "globull warming" means? Petros doesn't deny that it's warming either. Except when someone privides evidence--like 2014 being the warmest year on the surface temperature record. Then it's full denial mode. Typical of idealogues.

 

[petros]

Spectral physics is even more widely accetped than climate change. It has hundreds of applications everyday, from microwave ovens to medical diagnostics to lasers to chemistry, It's fudnamental to quantum phsycis. To be honest, you're the first person claiming to be a scientist I've ever met who doesn't accept if.

I'm the only one who doesn't believe we live in a jar?

 

[Zipperfish]

I'm the only one who doesn't believe we live in a jar?

And the dance begins.

 

[DaSleeper]

Sure is hard to get converts in this forum...huh?

 

[petros]

And the dance begins.

Hungry? Want a cricket and a beer?

 

[Zipperfish]

Hungry? Want a cricket and a beer?

Beer would hit the spot to be honest. Gonna go grab a root beer right now.

 

[petros]

Risking farting the jar?

 

[captain morgan]

Isn't what the "bull" in "globull warming" means? Petros doesn't deny that it's warming either. Except when someone privides evidence--like 2014 being the warmest year on the surface temperature record. Then it's full denial mode. Typical of idealogues.

Your movement has utterly failed to provide any form of confidence in the premise that climatic warming/cooling is the result of human activity.

That there is the bull in anthropogenic globull warming

 

[Zipperfish]

Your movement has utterly failed to provide any form of confidence in the premise that climatic warming/cooling is the result of human activity.

That there is the bull in anthropogenic globull warming

2014 was the warmest year on the instrumental surface temperature record.