New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
You have to love the morons that expect people to do search the net for them when they get cornered.
it's called the "70s global cooling meme" for a reason! I've responded to that here with a lengthy pointed post that showcased a paper (a meta study) of all the related published papers in the 60s/70s timeframe and the positions they held. The number of papers holding a cooling predictive position were significantly less than those with a warming predictive position. Did you think Locutus' post was bringing something new? Notwithstanding that post was simply a '2 paragraph' newspaper reference from the 60s... I'll hold that meta-study up to that clipping anytime. Bottom line is that meme you're again trotting out was one simply perpetuated by the media... most notably and principally, a Newsweek article.
of the other references you make, I'm not familiar with the posts you presume to speak to or the predictions themselves. The key point for you is to speak to, in any of these type predictions, is where are they coming from and what acceptance did they/do they hold. We're forever hearing from the "Captain Morgan" types around here about the Arctic ice free predictions. Yes, they've been made... progressively made, by a small number of scientists over time. I've never seen/read it established as a formal position statement from any recognized or acknowledged scientific body. So, per design, instead of recognizing the most significant, multi-decadal, sea-ice extent/volume/mass loss in the Arctic... deniers will ignore all that Arctic ice loss in favour of continually hyping the "ice free" predictions.
do you have anything subject related to add to this thread?
Even better, if weirdo pretends that they don't exist, then they simply don't exist.
This is one of the more childish situations (and posters) here at CC
I like Canadians. They're like Americans, only more Canadian. Are you suggesting that I shouldn't be interested in Canadian issues, or that watching the poo-flinging snow-apes of the Great White North is somehow less interesting or worthy than the poo-flinging of their more southerly cousins?
oh really! Pick your moments... oh my! No worries... put up with all this crap around here... and "your moment might surface"! :mrgreen:
again, there is no debate here... no chance for debate with the ongoing insult-fest and marginalization ploys. My posts aren't intended to coddle deniers... particularly those on this board who know little to nothing of the subject... but are forever in insult drive-by mode posturing as if they actually know something on the subject other than C&P from denier blogs.
aren't you clever... do you have anything to add to the thread's OP subject matter and related posts on radiative forcing and sensitivity?
yes... you're always looking for your next one, aren't you?
again: your inability and unwillingness to support your "documented frauds" statement is noted... has been noted, now several times.
Well, to be fair, your moment probably won't surface.
Fair few of 'em seem to be intended to whine about how hard-done-by you are.
you get the board you want... the board you deserve.
given the chance to discuss and disagree anonymously, negativity rules here! Typically, the usual suspect default position is to demean, insult, degrade and basically create (presumed) discomfort for those who they disagree with. Attempts to share a point of disagreement in a civil manner is read as a weakness... strength is perceived as an extension of aggression, intimidation and insults. What does it say of (some) human nature that the clubhouse crew here would spend its time over a brazillion posts trying to inflict (presumed) discomfort on other members... on anonymous personas! This is how YOU want to spend YOUR time? What pleasure can be found by insulting an anonymous board persona?
given the chance to discuss and disagree anonymously, negativity rules here! Typically, the usual suspect default position is to demean, insult, degrade and basically create (presumed) discomfort for those who they disagree with. Attempts to share a point of disagreement in a civil manner is read as a weakness... strength is perceived as an extension of aggression, intimidation and insults. What does it say of (some) human nature that the clubhouse crew here would spend its time over a brazillion posts trying to inflict (presumed) discomfort on other members... on anonymous personas! This is how YOU want to spend YOUR time? What pleasure can be found by insulting an anonymous board persona?
I'm rarely here... and now I'm off again - CUlater! By the by, you've made it clear you relish and enjoy the, as you called it, "ape poo flying" here. Enjoy it... nurture it! One would think all you guys would, at some point, get tired of simply jerking the exact same circle with the exact same members... over and over and over again! :mrgreen:
I find it odd that we have not had a host of positive responses to your, by your own admission, brilliant posts. One would assume that, given you are correct in assuming that you know only the real truth about climate science, a host of followers would have shown up long before now.
Are so called "sensitivity related postings" designed to prevent me from posturing my denial? Or to just make me realize that you are merely a colossal joke?
I have known for some time that you consider this place to be your personal sandbox, made known by you urging the mods and owner of this site to defend the turf by your rules. Too bad it does not work eh?
