It's "temporary" because there will always be a new threat that requires more freedoms be taken away to deal with the problem..
This is why we should never let neocons touch quotes from Franklin or Churchill.
It's "temporary" because there will always be a new threat that requires more freedoms be taken away to deal with the problem..
This is why we should never let neocons touch quotes from Franklin or Churchill.
Maybe you are just too easily frightened.
The key word there is 'temporary''
Nope. I just expect some results for all the BS I have to put up with everytime I go through the airport just to go to work.
Your plane hasn't been taken over by terrorists has it? Just what type of results are you looking for?
Pipelines and refineries and mines with no welfare bums hanging around blocking access.
And being able to get on a plane without spending an hour in the airport while some idiot steals my first aid scissors because they are a "threat".
And being able to get on a plane without spending an hour in the airport while some idiot steals my first aid scissors because they are a "threat".
Nah they just rather not have more power to stop them.
I don't agree with Bill C-51, rather than taking Freedom away, give citizens the right to protect themselves.
![]()
This is what we can look forward to with C-51:
![]()
My fellow citizens would not be at the wrong end of that gun. But I can see eccoterrorists and the anti everything crowd being dumb enough to try it. ANd they are much more of a threat to our way of life than any foreigners.
22 Minutes: Connie - Anti-Terror Legislation
www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLo_UQZib9jJihDLnBhBQABx0oIVUBlx-P&v=I1IliGODznk