Our cooling world
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
All he has are cliches, insults and feigned outrage to support his position.... You'll never see a definitive '97% consensus' of (all) scientists... It doesn't exist
97% of "what scientists" engaged in "what"? Again, I'm asking you to define your understanding/interpretation of the consensus. Quit deflecting - answer the question... waiting........
97% of 33%.
97% of 33% is far from a consensus. In fact, using it is lying. Lying to others and worst of all, yourself.
Wow... just wow. Go back and read what I replied to and what I questioned and what I asked to be proven. It's not me that has to define or prove squat. It is the one making the claim that I am calling bullshyte to. If you support his claim, then you can prove it if you so desire.
:mrgreen: clearly, another guy who doesn't know what the consensus even is... but yowzer, when did something like that ever dissuade your moronic statements from thundering forward. Perhaps you and member 'gerryh' should pool your failures, do a bit of research and come on back with your precisely defined understanding/interpretation of the consensus. I'm personally not too bothered with the number; some have it tagged as 97, some as 94, some as 91. But hey, still a consensus! And if only you actually knew what it meant!!!
I'm not asking you to "prove" anything. But yes, you do need to define what you're so hot and bothered with. Your latest post is most suggestive that you haven't a proper understanding. I'll let you twist while you blather/bluster/deflect... while you refuse to even provide a definition of what you're so concerned over. Again, it's a simple request... just state your understanding, your interpretation, of what the consensus means to you. Why is this so difficult for you? You sure wanted to talk about sumthin... but you seem to have extreme difficulty in providing even a basic definition. Go figure!
Responded to the following quote Einstein, I have even highlighted the important bits just for ya'll
If your truther buddy can't express himself to your twisted standard, then that's your problem.
Face it, your movement is dead and currently only fit to be used with the word bowel in front.
deflect away! Why is this so difficult for you? Plain and simple, so we have a clear reference point to work from: state your understanding, provide your interpretation of what the consensus means to you. Why is this so difficult for you?
Your numbers are incorrect and far too generous.
... 97% of the 33% that were polled, less the number that took legal action to have their names removed from that list
97% of 33% who wrote AGW paper and were polled and asked if they still believe their papers to be true.
What happened to change the minds of 3%?
This is typical of your responses. Baffle em with bullshyte seems to be your motto. Zipper made the comment that 97% of the worlds scientists........ I said I wanted to see proof of this 97%. Where is that number coming from? I think it is bullshyte. Prove the claim.
clearly, you don't know what you're talking about. You don't know what the consensus is. But why would that ever stop you. Again, a simple request; one you're avoiding at great lengths: please provide your understanding, your interpretation of what the consensus means to you?