Our cooling world

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Looks like the Antarctic will bottom-out next week around 2.5 million square km of sea ice. That's way above average because the water and the air are warmer than usual.

again Walter? Yet again? You can't simply keep dropping your references to Antarctic sea-ice extent without speaking to what significance you presume to... see in it... to make from it. You continue to ignore the lengthy posts scrutinizing your simple Antarctic sea-ice extent C&P references... lengthy detailed posts that I've even provided a critical summary of, for you... apparently, for you to also ignore! This summary:
- why do you continue to ignore the lengthy post responses provided to you that clearly question/detail:- why you presume to draw equivalencies between the Arctic and Antarctic

- why you presume to ignore the reasons provided to you for a couple of recent years growth in sea-ice extent... reasons that speak to, in part, a warming influence in that regard?

- why you presume to not provide any interpretation of your own as to why the Antarctic sea-ice extent has increased... while repeatedly speaking sarcastically to 'warming causing ice to form"

- why you presume to ignore the fact Antarctic sea-ice extent melts per norm, almost entirely, year-to-year.

- why you presume to ignore the fact no like Arctic concept of significant multi-year sea-ice exists within the Antarctic exists

- why you presume to ignore the significant long-term trend in decreasing Antarctic ice mass​
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
He gets easily frustrated arguing with idiots. :lol:

yes, they certainly are idiots... of the denier extraordinaire kind! But you misread/misinterpret... there certainly is no frustration I'm projecting. This is shytes & giggles for me - big time! On those most rare occasions that I feel like slumming, I'll throw up a dedicated window for CC... and playing with these most juvenile and petutant a-holes is just that - playTime! I'll throw out a post and watch them gravitate to my post... like moths to a light... they just can't help themselves! The latest frustration wrinkle on their parts is that with them ON IGNORE, they've resorted to peppering my posts with reddies! :mrgreen: Swwwwweet!
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Great plot too: 97% of the world's scientists contrive an environmental crisis, but are exposed by a plucky band of right wing nutbars, billionaires & oil companies


That is great stuff!... Coordinate with your buddy and get that fiction in the novel.

I can already tell that this will be a big hit with the world's scientists... I'd plan and selling at least one book to each so you had better print off 20 or 30 books
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Great plot too: 97% of the world's scientists contrive an environmental crisis, but are exposed by a plucky band of right wing nutbars, billionaires & oil companies

and these CC "fake-skeptics/deniers" just lap it up... lap it up good... lap it up reeeal good!
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
I thought he is on the payroll of the believers. No one could possibly post all that BS without being paid for it.

any time lil' drive-by arteeest! Any time you'd actually like to put something forward... and stay and argue it... and substantiate it beyond your numbingly stooopid regular fall-back. You know, where you huff-n-puff, throw insults, deflect and distract wildly... where you revert to your now infamous response where you state something like, "I don't need to support anything... it's all been said in prior CC threads/posts... I'm not going to reinvent the wheel here for you"!!! :mrgreen:
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Great plot too: 97% of the world's scientists contrive an environmental crisis, but are exposed by a plucky band of right wing nutbars, billionaires & oil companies





Bullshyte, prove this "97%" crap. You've put it forward, now prove it.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Bullshyte, prove this "97%" crap. You've put it forward, now prove it.

most deniers, I expect you're included, don't exactly know what the consensus even is. They'll blather and bluster and whine and wail... yet they, I expect you're included, don't even understand what the consensus is. Typically, if you ask one to define their understanding, to provide their interpretation, they'll either go mute and scurry away... or... they'll deflect/distract to no end. In that vein, what will you do when I ask you to provide your understanding/interpretation of what he consensus is?

cause, I'm asking you... waiting............