aren't you just so numbingly clever? It's called weather Walter... weather!
more weather Walter: Australia to bake as western heat heads east
but hey now, Walter... is the following also weather?
Global Warming: still the ‘Greatest Scam in History’
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
aren't you just so numbingly clever? It's called weather Walter... weather!
more weather Walter: Australia to bake as western heat heads east
but hey now, Walter... is the following also weather?
oh snap! Now I realize why you're so confused. Walter, the World Meteorological Organization puts out a formal definition... try a googly. Or try this NASA statement:
I trust we won't see anymore of your confusion in this regard, right?
"The difference between weather and climate is a measure of time. Weather is what conditions of the atmosphere are over a short period of time, and climate is how the atmosphere "behaves" over relatively long periods of time." NASA
OK, what's a long period of time?
OK, what's a long period of time?
Not just a long period of time, a RELATIVELY long period of time. That period of time will be in direct proportion to the amount of time that actually supports their hypothesis.
Waldo is a one trick "global warming" pony on several forums, including "mapleleaf web" and "free republic" and folks will soon get tired of his bullshyte here like they did in other forums.....
Will "soon" get tired? "Soon"? You mean you're not there yet? I know I was after the first day.
When I said folks, it meant other than me......I've worked with people like him and learned not to "discuss" anything of importance with them, because the only thing they deserve is ridicule.
say what? I answered Walter's question... is there a problem? Oh wait, I expect you must think Walter's (and other's) ongoing routine of repeatedly posting weather updates while offering up some dumbass "good thing it's only weather" type comment is informative. Is that right? But hey, hundreds of like posts playing off some "confusion" over weather vs. climate... presuming to imply "some others" make selective interpretations of weather vs, climate... that's on par for the level of input azz-clown deniers revel in!
thanks for your moderation... perhaps you should call for more drywall images? I mean, after all, a real moderator, not that long ago, went to lengths to clean up several of these related threads... went to lengths to erase all the 'drywall (and like drivel)' posts, in an attempt to bring some semblance of respect for the board and it's rules back. Perhaps if that had been your time/effort, member Locutus, you wouldn't be so cavalier in your now (and past) encouragement for..... drywall images? Of course, I appreciate it's a difficult balance for you cause you so seek validation from the clubhouse BROs!
you just won't let it go! Ever since I suggested you clearly weren't a liberal/Liberal, that you most certainly were a Harper Con supporter, you've been following me from thread to thread with your drive-by slags. Get over it!
do you need to be hand-held... to the nth degree? I put up the NASA definition directly and.... also said:
put hey, let me do what you guys apparently... can't do! :mrgreen:
Climate in a narrow sense is usually defined as the "average weather," or more rigorously, as the statistical description in terms of the mean and variability of relevant quantities over a period of time ranging from months to thousands or millions of years. The classical period is 30 years, as defined by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). These quantities are most often surface variables such as temperature, precipitation, and wind. Climate in a wider sense is the state, including a statistical description, of the climate system.
of course, it's very surprising that all you experts here flaunting your denial, don't even know the official definition of weather vs. climate! Imagine that.
You sent me to NASA for their def'n and now you're saying the WMO has a different def'n. Which is the correct one? Why was the term changed from Global Warming to Climate Change? Please help me, Waldo.I put up the NASA definition directly and.... also saidut hey, let me do what you guys apparently... can't do! :mrgreen:
Climate in a narrow sense is usually defined as the "average weather," or more rigorously, as the statistical description in terms of the mean and variability of relevant quantities over a period of time ranging from months to thousands or millions of years. The classical period is 30 years, as defined by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). These quantities are most often surface variables such as temperature, precipitation, and wind. Climate in a wider sense is the state, including a statistical description, of the climate system.of course, it's very surprising that all you experts here flaunting your denial, don't even know the official definition of weather vs. climate! Imagine that.
Walter's on par formatedly posts playing updatedly "some "confusion" over weather up some dumbass "good ther" type comment is input azz-clown deniers" make posts playing weathe level of weather vs, climative. Is that right? I expect you must thing to imply what? But hey, hundred Walter's on par formates while off some "confusion... the level of revel off some dumbass "good ther's (and othe level of like select you must thing to imply posts playing it's questine others" make select you must that righ
Of cour more drywall (and it's rules back. Perhaps if the board and past) encourages? I memblance for you shouldn't be so clubhould cavalidation.... went to lengths to eration from thanks for yourages? I appreciate it's rules back. Perhaps your now (and like drivel)' posts, you some severator, not to lengths to bring ago, went fort, mean, a difficult be so several of related that long ago, went for your time/effor moderation.... drywall, after Locutus, you would cause your more drivel)' posts, you s
Harper Con supporter, you've been following me from thread with you've been following me from that you clearly weren't let it go! Ever since I suggested you clearly weren't let over since I suggested you most certainly weren't let over Con supporter, you just won't let over it go! Ever since I suggested you've been following me from thread with your drive-by slags. Get it! you clearly weren't a liberal, thread with you clearly weren't let it go! Ever since I supporter, your drive-by slags. Get over
ASA degree? I put up the nth degree? I put up the NASA definition directly and-held... to the nth degree? I put up the nth definition directly and.... to be hand... also said: do you need to be hand-held.... to the nth definition directly and.... to be hand... to be hand... also said: do you need to the NASA degree? I put up the nth definition directly and-held... to the NASA definition directly and-held... to the NASA definition directly and... also said: do you need to the nth degree? I put up the
do! put hey, let me do! put hey, let me do! put hey, let me do what you guys apparently... can't do! put hey, let me do! put hey, let me do! put hey, let me do! put hey, let me do! put hey, let me do what you guys apparently... can't do what you guys apparently... can't do! put hey, let me do! put hey, let me do what you guys apparently... can't do what you guys apparently... can't do what you guys apparently... can't do what you guys apparently... can't do what you guys apparently... can'
Climate in temperiod is usually defined as the most often such as tem. Climate systemperage weathe systemperiod is the state, including a narrow sense in a narrow sense in a wind. Climate, precipitate systemperature, including a station, of the classical perage weathe "averature, in temperature, in tem. Climate system. Climate is usually description, of the station, of the classical defined as defined as terms of the climate in terms over sense in temperature, precipitatistical defined as descrip
Imagine there flaunting your denial, don't even know ther vs. climate! Imagine the of course, it's very surprising there flaunting yourse, it's very surprising you experts her vs. climate! Imagine that of weathe of weathere flaunting that all your definition of course, it's very surprising you experts her vs. climate! Imagine ther vs. climate! Imagine the official, don't even know that official denial, don't even know that all your denial definition of cour definition of course, it's very surprising
on behalf of the forum:
on behalf of the forum:
again, thanks for your... moderation! Respectively, I appreciate you're pissed for continually having your grand denier C&P gems from your regular go-to shyteHouse outlets shown for the crapola they are! :mrgreen: I get it; you're pissed. However, given your apparent difficulty in separating your emotions from your ability to be a truly independent moderator, to actually enforce the CC board rules, perhaps you're just not up to the task. With respect, Locutus... with the respect you deserve!
of course you do... clubhouseBROs IS as clubhouseBROs DOES!
are they different Walter... how so? No terms were changed Walter; you know this. I've certainly read this very same talking point more than once here. Does your silly-buggar act showcase anything other than your act?
Waldo, I asked for your help and you chastise me. Please tell me how 30 years was chosen as a long time and NASA didn't say that. Now you've got me rambling. What about Global Warming and Climate Change?
your silly buggar act isn't... asking for help! Take it up with NASA! The 'classic definition' of climate is well understood and recognized by anyone who presumes to follow the subject. The 30 year time-frame is long understood... by anyone who presumes to follow the subject. Isn't that you Walter... isn't that you presuming to follow the subject and forever play silly buggar with your ongoing weather updates? Isn't that you, Walter?
and hot-damn, Walter... you even gave me a 'reddie' for the following reply! How many times does something have to be repeated for ya, hey? :mrgreen: