Global Warming: still the ‘Greatest Scam in History’

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
uhhh, Locutus... that's emeritus prof! Renowned denier Lindzen has moved on to formally become a hired gun. Apparently, his past Heartland, GWPF, Cooler Heads Coalition, etc., gigs just weren't paying his bills! And this way, of course, he doesn't have all those wascally legitimate scientists always debunking his published papers!
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,870
116
63
uhhh, Locutus... that's emeritus prof! Renowned denier Lindzen has moved on to formally become a hired gun. Apparently, his past Heartland, GWPF, Cooler Heads Coalition, etc., gigs just weren't paying his bills! And this way, of course, he doesn't have all those wascally legitimate scientists always debunking his published papers!
No proof?
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Ask him to post a pretty graph Petros... He loves pretty graphs

hey Cappy, long time no drive-by insult! Wassup. Don't tell me you have the same condition as member taxi... graphs are your friends! You shouldn't be afraid of graphs... again, they're simply a presentation format! :mrgreen:

Hottesth ever!

dance petros, dance!

Where is the proof of your claim that Lindzen is a "hired gun"?

oh you got me Walter... cause there's no past examples of Lindzen being paid for appearances/speeches. :mrgreen: Lindzen doesn't regularly appear along the denier rubber-chicken circuit... that's some other guy!
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,870
116
63
oh you got me Walter... cause there's no past examples of Lindzen being paid for appearances/speeches. Lindzen doesn't regularly appear along the denier rubber-chicken circuit... that's some other guy!
Just as I thought, pulling it out of yer azz as usual.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
hey Cappy, long time no drive-by insult! Wassup. Don't tell me you have the same condition as member taxi... graphs are your friends! You shouldn't be afraid of graphs... again, they're simply a presentation format! :mrgreen:

Your graphs are so pretty and because of that, they must be fact.

... Oh, I almost forgot

 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Your graphs are so pretty and because of that, they must be fact.

... Oh, I almost forgot

and there we have it! You've managed to combine your regular 'butt-hurtin' with drywall. You're a baiting master... a freakin' master baiter! :mrgreen:

and by the by... why not try countering any of those graphs you so have difficulty with. I appreciate that would get in the way of your insult drive-by schtick, but.....

The last one said it was the hottest ever.

That's scienterrific proof.

did it? Dance petros, dance! :mrgreen: Look, I acknowledge this doesn't go back to the Holocene Optimum you're forever flogging, but... oh wait, are you ready yet? Are you finally going to put forward the points of comparative reference between the Holocene Optimum and today's relatively recent warming. Are you finally ready... or are you still working on your reply?

 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
and by the by... why not try countering any of those graphs you so have difficulty with. I appreciate that would get in the way of your insult drive-by schtick, but.....

Why bother?... I have millenia of periodic, continental glaciation episodes to articulate my position.

Lemme guess, you don't believe that there was ever any continental glaciation, right?

Look, I acknowledge this doesn't go back to the Holocene Optimum

So, basically, what you're saying is that the graph and therefore your position, is entirely useless.

Thanks for the clarity on that
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Why bother?... I have millenia of periodic, continental glaciation episodes to articulate my position.

Lemme guess, you don't believe that there was ever any continental glaciation, right?

So, basically, what you're saying is that the graph and therefore your position, is entirely useless.

Thanks for the clarity on that

oh my! Not another guy, yet another guy, who presumes to use the long-distant past to... to... to.... say sumthin (?????) about today's relatively recent warming.

Since 98?

Which 98?

Hottest

:mrgreen: again, are you getting closer to finally offering up your comparative reference(s) between the Holocene Optimum and today's relatively recent warming? What are you waiting on... why is it taking you sooooooooo long to reply? :mrgreen:
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
oh my! Not another guy, yet another guy, who presumes to use the long-distant past to... to... to.... say sumthin (?????) about today's relatively recent warming.

Ummmm... I don't know what to say to that kind of massive degree of stupidity.

Hint: If the argument is that the climatic swings are a function of natural cycles; going back as far as possible is the scientifically prudent thing to do.

Sorry that it completely undermines your myopic agenda.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,390
12,827
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ummmm... I don't know what to say to that kind of massive degree of stupidity.

Hint: If the argument is that the climatic swings are a function of natural cycles; going back as far as possible is the scientifically prudent thing to do.

Sorry that it completely undermines your myopic agenda.

Data on 17 interglacials is readily available on the IPCC site. Good stuff really.