Don't be ridiculous. Swords, spears, war axes, arbalests, misericordia, garrotes, maces, arrows, javelins, shurikens, poison darts, tomahawks, clubs, naphtha, ship rams, cannon, the list goes on and on and on. . .As far as I can see, guns are still the only article that's sole purpose is to kill the living.
Oh, I'm fine....... after all, I am one of the sane majority. Just for the heck of it, Google and see what happened to cigarette companies who tried to sell dangerous items to the public and got sued. It took awhile and they are still hanging in there but nicely controlled. I wouldn't invest in stocks of either cigarettes or gun companies.
Well, the difference between a car driven by a drunk and a gun in the hands of a nutcase IS....drum roll please.....wait for it.....A car is to get from here to there, a gun is the same except t it is meant to transport one of the living to one of the dead!!
For those who cannot tell the difference are advised to shoot their car motor and see which one survives, the gun or the car. Be careful of the ricochet though, finding out the difference could be painful or fatal.
So What You Are Saying That People Aren’t Responsible ? So Why Do They Get Charged With Murder , And Not The Gun ? Your Article Is Just Illogical Sh*t , Guns Don’t Get Up And Pull Their Triggers ! People Pick Up The Fukking Gun , Load It , Aim , And Pull The Trigger . Therefore , That Person Is Responsible For That Death , Not The Gun .
Good grief, the comparison was between car crashes and guns Now which of the items you mention fall into that category and all told have they killed anywhere near the number of people killed world wide by guns in a single year in the past 10 years!!Don't be ridiculous. Swords, spears, war axes, arbalests, misericordia, garrotes, maces, arrows, javelins, shurikens, poison darts, tomahawks, clubs, naphtha, ship rams, cannon, the list goes on and on and on. . .
Good grief, the comparison was between car crashes and guns Now which of the items you mention fall into that category and all told have they killed anywhere near the number of people killed world wide by guns in a single year in the past 10 years!!
Irrelevant. You stated that the gun was the only device made exclusively for killing living things. I simply demonstrated how wrong you were.Good grief, the comparison was between car crashes and guns Now which of the items you mention fall into that category and all told have they killed anywhere near the number of people killed world wide by guns in a single year in the past 10 years!!
Ahh You can't get away with that. In the short term, I hardly think bow and arrow deaths even come close to guns in the past 100 years. Why do we consider ourselves civilized when everyone needs to be armed to survive or for protection against our own species ?? I am sorry but cave men or Mongols do not qualify as lawful citizens.The definitive answer is that one of the oldest weapons is responsible for taking the most lives. Guns and bombs are such recent innovations in the time scale of human history that they could never compete with the humble bow and arrow, which has been around since Neolithic times and on every continent except Australia. Only the atlatyl (a lever operated spear) is older than the bow and was almost completely replaced by it more than 10,000 yeas ago. All the great empires employed bows in warfare: the Mongols, Phonecians, Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, and even Medieval Britain.What weapon has killed the most people in history
Not irrevelant, you took it out of context. Oh and one other thing, the cigarette companies finally lost big time in all the law suits brought against them. I wouldn't count too strongly about gun manufacturers getting off either. Make take three or more tries but it will happen.Irrelevant. You stated that the gun was the only device made exclusively for killing living things. I simply demonstrated how wrong you were.
Can you give us a straight answer for just one or two posts?
You don't have a problem with a police officer with gun, but you have a problem with lawful citizens having guns. Come on and be truthful about the difference...
The difference certainly is not the handgun, and it certainly doesn't have anything to do with cars.
The difference - and I'll describe this in a general sense - the difference is your confidence in lawful citizens.
Am I correct so far? Please respond.
She probably won't, but I can fill in the stuff that most fairly sane anti-gunners use.Can you give us a straight answer for just one or two posts?
The first answer is accidental deaths, suicides, and the fact that someone who has thus far been a lawful citizen cannot be presumed to remain so. Accidental gun deaths and suicides in the United States exceed homicides by a factor of two. And since most homicides are committed by people known to the victims, which indicates that the homicides were previously-lawful citizens who "snapped." Ergo, the large majority of gun deaths are caused by lawful citizens, so the issue is the guns, not the motivation of the wielders.You don't have a problem with a police officer with gun, but you have a problem with lawful citizens having guns. Come on and be truthful about the difference...
The difference certainly is not the handgun, and it certainly doesn't have anything to do with cars.
Essentially. The anti-gunner position is that guns are too dangerous and powerful to be in the hands of anyone but trained professionals.The difference - and I'll describe this in a general sense - the difference is your confidence in lawful citizens.
Am I correct so far? Please respond.
Bloody right. I have found in the US, law is not in the hands of law enforcement but in the hands of those who have managed to circumvent the laws by buying or stealing guns from those able to buy them legally. There are gun shop everywhere, but even lawful citizens boast about having guns they have not acquired legally. This I know from several some "law-abiding" citizens who have guns gotten from sources off the radar. And NO I would not even think of reporting any of them. I value MY life too much.Bump
It is down. Way down. As far as your attempt to portray an extreme example as typical, let me turn that one back on you. When you can demonstrate a way to remove every single legal and illegal gun from society, I am 100% on your side. But it must be every single gun. Nothing less will have any effect at all.When I am told gun violence is down, I simply turn on the news and I know, just as everyone with the least grasp of math, knows it is so high as to be off the chart. Just today, 4 armed men broke into a home, pistol whipped the owner, raped his wife and made off with anything of value. How does a home owner with a single gun work with that!!
Bloody right. I have found in the US, law is not in the hands of law enforcement but in the hands of those who have managed to circumvent the laws by buying or stealing guns from those able to buy them legally.
Bloody right. I have found in the US, law is not in the hands of law enforcement but in the hands of those who have managed to circumvent the laws by buying or stealing guns from those able to buy them legally. There are gun shop everywhere, but even lawful citizens boast about having guns they have not acquired legally. This I know from several some "law-abiding" citizens who have guns gotten from sources off the radar. And NO I would not even think of reporting any of them. I value MY life too much.
It is down. Way down. As far as your attempt to portray an extreme example as typical, let me turn that one back on you. When you can demonstrate a way to remove every single legal and illegal gun from society, I am 100% on your side. But it must be every single gun. Nothing less will have any effect at all.
Wrong......The major newspapers only report crimes committed with guns...the news of guns saving lives are hidden in local news only.Hi Bluebyrd- From skimming over your post, I think you are telling us that people are the problem, NOT guns! We hear all the time that crime is down, and yet we know from what we see on news and see on the street that, that is pure, unadulterated, utter bullsh*t. How much crime that the cops themselves commit actually gets reported? Even if guns were completely banned and destroyed, it wouldn't make one iota of difference to crime.............we'd still have to watch our backs fully expecting to get hit on the head with a rock. But then again it has a lot to do with the system, like murderers going to jail for 4 years. Oh yeah, it's not called murder, it's called negligent death!
NO, NO and NO................REPORTED crime is down!
Add that to seemingly quiet, introverted mental patients, bullied students and road rage and you have a recipe for exactly what we have here.......the highest gun violence within a "civilized" country period. .
Don't bother to quote faulty stats either dating from 2010 and before, because no matter what source you quote, IT IS NOT accurate. The NRA saw to that, by getting funding cut for compulsory reporting of gun wounds or deaths.
.
When I am told gun violence is down, I simply turn on the news and I know, just as everyone with the least grasp of math, knows it is so high as to be off the chart. .