How the GW myth is perpetuated

captain morgan

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Tonington said:
In here? How do you measure the current, by the most vocal and frequent contributors in these threads? Maybe I am going against the current here. I guess if you measure it by the dim rodents fuzzy banker logic, then very likely! Whatever the case, doesn't make one iota of difference.
Click to expand...


That depends on whether we're talking the source or regulator of the current

Sorry, couldn't help myself
 
Tonington

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
petros said:
Theoretically CO2 is a GHG and going by CO2 content there SHOULD be warming but it's not acting as theory dictates.
Click to expand...

How much warming should there be? Let's see your math.

captain morgan said:
That depends on whether we're talking the source or regulator of the current

Sorry, couldn't help myself
Click to expand...

:lol: No need to apologize.

ETA: thought of one other thing it depends on, what the substance is that's moving. There's an awful lot of BS! ;)
 
darkbeaver

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Tonington said:
Regulator or source of energy? There's a huge difference. Try welding without a regulator of pressure or flow. You solar worshipers are funny.

Speaking of differences, one difference between you and I is that I don't dismiss the effects or impact of the other factors. I dismiss the magnitude of the effect solar cycles are having right now, that's for sure, and I'm dismissive of alternative explanations that are't backed by hypothesis testing...like I said, show me something (data), don't just point like a Bronze age Pagan. Maybe you prefer the myopic view of things, but it's not for me. If I appear blind to you, maybe it's because I see the things you can't?



So what if it's .008? That doesn't mean anything. Insulin regulates lots of things, not just blood sugar, and a standard dose is 0.000002 of your blood volume. There are lots of examples in this universe where potent regulators are very small constituents of the whole.

As for the effects of gases, I have yet to see an alternative explanation of our climate compared to other planets that can be adequately explained without the gases in our atmosphere, including CO2.

Tbone has said he will watch the video I posted by Richard Alley. I have no idea if he will or not, but you should watch it too.



In here? How do you measure the current, by the most vocal and frequent contributors in these threads? Maybe I am going against the current here. I guess if you measure it by the dim rodents fuzzy banker logic, then very likely! Whatever the case, doesn't make one iota of difference.
Click to expand...

Thank you for your high quality input which I respect and admire, although that's not always evident, you're a tough nut to crack and I can only learn from trying, which is full of high quality kicks, always to the head. I'll look for your flick link and watch it. I haven't the slightest doubt that you can see and understand things that I cannot and never will, however it's a really big universe. I like it when you get excited.


The Shiny Mountains of Venus | holoscience.com | The Electric UniverseMore evidence for the electrical nature of Venus comes from the Dutch astronomer Houtgast. He found there is a marked reduction in the solar corpuscular radiation reaching the Earth whenever Venus is interposed between it and the Sun at or near an inferior conjunction. He estimated that the effect could be accounted for on the assumption that Venus has a magnetic field about five times stronger than the Earth’s [Houtgast: Sky and Telescope 15:8 (1955), p. 419.]. Since Venus has no measurable magnetic field, it is better explained as an electrical shielding effect.
 
darkbeaver

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
If I weld from a directly from a car battery the regulation is proportional to the anode diameter. Yes I partially understand the regulating qualities of the planets atmosphere. with a but
 
darkbeaver

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I'd just like to remind the participants in this er ah contest that actually winning an argument here is accompanied by a vanishingly small prize.

Tonington said:
Whatever support you give for your math. An expected result has to come from something.
Click to expand...

Could you point me to that link, I've gone back five or six pages with no results.
 
Tonington

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
petros said:
The are no constants when it comes to the planet
Click to expand...

That's retarded, of course there are. There are many physical constants. For instance, the radiation emitted by an object and how it relates to the frequency of the wavelength it is emitted at is called Planck's constant for a reason...

so what are you going to check it against?
Click to expand...

I already answered this.

You said 'expected'. How much?

Though your refusal to even try to answer is not unexpected.
 
darkbeaver

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
There are no physical constants in variable fields, it has been suggested, some have even demonstrated as much, it is thought.

Inconstant Radioactive Decay Startles Physicists | Space News

Posted on June 20, 2013 by B Talbott
For many years a scientific controversy has been brewing far from the spotlight of mainstream media. How constant are physical constants? For decades the scientific consensus has been that “true constants”, such as the speed of light and the gravitational … Continue reading →
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Locutus said:
a classic of perpetual bullsh!tting:
Click to expand...

so... uhhh... you don't concur with this insightful post just provided a short while back by member 'Zipperfish'? Do you not concur?
Zipperfish said:
NOAA has released its global analysis for October.

Global Analysis - October 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

Global Highlights


  • The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for October 2014 was the highest on record for October, at 0.74°C (1.33°F) above the 20th century average of 14.0°C (57.1°F).
  • The global land surface temperature was 1.05°C (1.89°F) above the 20th century average of 9.3°C (48.7°F)—the fifth highest for October on record.
  • For the ocean, the October global sea surface temperature was 0.62°C (1.12°F) above the 20th century average of 15.9°C (60.6°F) and the highest for October on record.
  • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for the January–October period (year-to-date) was 0.68°C (1.22°F) above the 20th century average of 14.1°C (57.4°F). The first ten months of 2014 were the warmest such period on record.

---------------
That's the NOAA report.. NASA released their report last week indicating that October, globally, was the warmest on record, tying with 2005. The UHA satellite record reported the warmest October on record, tied with 2012. No word on the HADCRUT record yet. I wonder if they've stopped doing the monthly round-up.
Click to expand...
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
captain morgan said:
Whoda thunk that it would be hot in India during the summer months... It' news to me

Please, please this one time - think of the children!
Click to expand...

ya ya, it was 48 C / 118 F that day in the India city referenced... I guess youse guys choose to sweat the small stuff while ignoring the bigger picture, hey? Again:
Global Analysis - October 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

Global Highlights


  • The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for October 2014 was the highest on record for October, at 0.74°C (1.33°F) above the 20th century average of 14.0°C (57.1°F).
  • The global land surface temperature was 1.05°C (1.89°F) above the 20th century average of 9.3°C (48.7°F)—the fifth highest for October on record.
  • For the ocean, the October global sea surface temperature was 0.62°C (1.12°F) above the 20th century average of 15.9°C (60.6°F) and the highest for October on record.
  • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for the January–October period (year-to-date) was 0.68°C (1.22°F) above the 20th century average of 14.1°C (57.4°F). The first ten months of 2014 were the warmest such period on record.
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Locutus said:
you still here? :lol:

your little posts are always interesting kid but you've got a long way to go to reach my level of internet.
Click to expand...

Grasshopper, you are not paid. The work is hard. Why do you continue? Will you walk with me Grasshopper?

​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom