So you'll need to prove that the Economist's version is a wild assumption then.
Words like "if, might, could, possibly, may etc" are a dead give away MF.
At the new prices buy some aviation fuel and bump the timing a bit and you'll be setting new record.Run out? Oh oh. I better take the 5mpg 427CID 67 Fairlane out for a 175km/h run this weekend. Global warming is going to give us a nice balmy weekend.
Knock knock?
US is now the world's biggest producer of oil, thanks to fracking.WHat ever happened to OPEC?
Lower energy prices are better for the economy as a whole and slowing down the development of the oil sands will not have a negative impact on the economy. In fact it might even be better if we are not fixated on one resource.
I didn't know you're a liberal.
Not. Common sense.
Natural gas is the future of energy..
Burn baby burn!
It's not even a good transitional source of energy.
My thing is the transition to renewables but we know that won't happen without some influence over the oil industry.
The hand that moves industry is legislation and that Economist article made it clear that a shift in regulatory policy to accommodate the environment necessarily influences the oil sector.
It's also the reason why Conservative governments like ours and Australia's - governments that are effectively working for oil companies - promote free trade like it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I think people are slowly starting to realize that we need very tight control on business and financial practice, whereas social matters need more liberty without causing significant harm to the environment.
It's super abundant. Far too cheap for renewables to compete with.
I'm not talking about how cheap it is.
It will do until people understand that coal is the way to go. Canada has several hundred years of the stuff in the ground just waiting to be bought and used.