They won't move an old pipe for that....It could go through the US below the lakes and be shorter.
They won't move an old pipe for that....It could go through the US below the lakes and be shorter.
They aren't pay $36In BC to somebody who just walked out of a premployment course.
I don't think so. Hard to predict of course, but I suspect this will evolve to soemthing like the "war in the woods" of the 80s, over concerns with forestry practices. One of the conditions for the pipeline is consultation with First Nations, and that's going to be a mighty hard condition to meet, considering the overwhelming opposition by First Nations.
Time this country came to the realisation it is not native land, not the developed land.
Second the pipe is being laid, and when it is all laid and operational, I highly suspect the 'conditions' will go by the wayside.
I am all for this project, but not to give the Indians any royalties, they need to work for the land and pay for it like we do. Time to move on and quit blaming and start doing.
OK, so physicists, meteorologists, and biologists aren't qualified to speak on climate change, but an oceanographer is qualified to speak on pipelines.Cousteau was a huge supporter of pipelines
OK, so physicists, meteorologists, and biologists aren't qualified to speak on climate change, but an oceanographer is qualified to speak on pipelines.
OK, so physicists, meteorologists, and biologists aren't qualified to speak on climate change, but an oceanographer is qualified to speak on pipelines.