Yup trying to get sympathy for the "cop killer."
I'll bet there are already a dozen lawyers lined up to defend the pr!ck!
Everybody dies.
Not without a hell of a struggle. -
Last edited:
Yup trying to get sympathy for the "cop killer."
Everybody dies.
Eleven, actually. I had to withdraw cuz I'm not licensed in NB.I'll be there are already a dozen lawyers lined up to defend the pr!ck!
How would that get him sympathy? Sane or insane, they get locked up.
This "person" had this planned. He spoke about doing something like this to friends, he purposefully walked out in public with weapons and an appearance that would alarm people to get them to call 911...
There IS no defense for this; none. He wasn't "crazy", he didn't "snap"... he did this with full knowledge of what he was doing.
I hope he rots for what he did.
you'd best hope so...if there were no one to defend him, the justice system would collapseI'll bet there are already a dozen lawyers lined up to defend the pr!ck!
you are not looking at this in a logical way nor at the big picture...There's no doubt in my mind, but between the lawyers and psychiatrists they'll make it out to be something else. That's the problem with our "justice" system, the people we should be able to depend on are just as bonkers/evil as the miscreants.
it's not him you are defending it's our system so they sure as hell had better do a good job, the lives of the innocent depend upon itIndeed, everybody deserves a defense.
But nobody ever said they deserve a good defense.
And I'd hate to be the lawyer trying to defend the indefensible.
you'd best hope so...if there were no one to defend him, the justice system would collapse
everyone deserves a defense...that's how we protect the innocent
you are not looking at this in a logical way nor at the big picture...
(see above)
I hear you too but don't believe that will happen here...I hear you, Sal and I partially agree. Everyone deserves a lawyer to see they get a fair trial - but not some f**kin' A$$hole looking for wrinkles, like they spelt his middle name wrong when they laid the charges.
As one of the a*sholes, I'll answer that. The criminal judicial system is a machine, a machine that grinds up lives and spits them out. It also grinds up the Constitution and individual rights along the way, and produces bizarre results, like 5X the sentence for crack cocaine than for an equal amount of powder cocaine, or in some states a major felony conviction and substantial prison time for half a joint. The prosecutor is supposed to independently investigate and be convinced of the accused's guilt before he proceeds, but that doesn't happen. The cops find somebody who "looks good" for the crime, then the whole machine switches from looking for the criminal to making the tightest case they can against the accused. They bring dozens of people, millions of dollars, and a veil of secrecy that's damned hard to break. Against that, unless the accused happens to be rich, you've got a defence lawyer working alone, or a public defender with 500 other cases on his desk (the average U.S. public defender handles 600 cases a year). The defence rarely has any ability to conduct independent tests, little if any budget to investigate, and often can't even see the prosecution's full case, despite the legal requirement that the prosecution turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defence. It's also fighting against the bias of "if he wasn't guilty, the cops wouldn't have arrested him," which is the exact OPPOSITE of what the bias should be (innocent until proven guilty).I hear you, Sal and I partially agree. Everyone deserves a lawyer to see they get a fair trial - but not some f**kin' A$$hole looking for wrinkles, like they spelt his middle name wrong when they laid the charges.
I hear you too but don't believe that will happen here...
none the less looking for every wrinkle is the job of the lawyer, and if he were defending you, the emotion attached to it would not be the label of fuking azzhole...
it can not be done one way for one and another for someone else
it's the way the system plays it...it is not truthful or just but it's the best we currently have and we have to protect it at all costs
As one of the a*sholes, I'll answer that. The criminal judicial system is a machine, a machine that grinds up lives and spits them out. It also grinds up the Constitution and individual rights along the way, and produces bizarre results, like 5X the sentence for crack cocaine than for an equal amount of powder cocaine, or in some states a major felony conviction and substantial prison time for half a joint. The prosecutor is supposed to independently investigate and be convinced of the accused's guilt before he proceeds, but that doesn't happen. The cops find somebody who "looks good" for the crime, then the whole machine switches from looking for the criminal to making the tightest case they can against the accused. They bring dozens of people, millions of dollars, and a veil of secrecy that's damned hard to break. Against that, unless the accused happens to be rich, you've got a defence lawyer working alone, or a public defender with 500 other cases on his desk (the average U.S. public defender handles 600 cases a year). The defence rarely has any ability to conduct independent tests, little if any budget to investigate, and often can't even see the prosecution's full case, despite the legal requirement that the prosecution turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defence. It's also fighting against the bias of "if he wasn't guilty, the cops wouldn't have arrested him," which is the exact OPPOSITE of what the bias should be (innocent until proven guilty).
So, yeah, I'm gonna blow holes in the procedural case if I possibly can. I'm going to leap on every single tiny little error the cops and prosecutors have made. Because if they spelled the accused's name wrong, or got his address wrong, or his birthday, they're being sloppy. And being sloppy means they also might have fudged the forensic tests, or maybe it just kinda slipped their minds that they have some exculpatory evidence they were supposed to turn over to me.
And if my guy is guilty, I'm gonna use every trick in the book to get him off, or to get him a lighter sentence. Because when you have the might and wealth of the state all set up to lock you in a cell forever, you deserve to have one guy who's in your corner.
A whole lot worse than a prosecutor feels when somebody he locked up 20 years ago is finally exonerated. I know, I've spoken to them. And I've watched and listened while they just shrugged and said "Too bad. I was just doing my job." Even when the case was shot through with abuses of process and Constitutional violations.Oh, I like that avatar!! I agree with every "wrinkle" that casts doubt as to the guilt of the accused but not wrinkles arising from some bureaucrat screwing up. In this case there are lots of eye witnesses, finger prints etc. so I can't see any reason why the trial should last more than half an hour. Of course I know realistically (again because of a f*(ked up justice system) that, that won't happen.
O.K. Tecumseh, I stand corrected and upon further thought agree with what you say with one exception, which I've high lighted. How would you feel if you got an axe murderer (that you know to be guilty) acquitted and he went out and did a few more axe murders?
Either way I don't see a particularly enjoyable future for him. Down the road a few years, I think he might reflect that "he shouldn't have done that".
There's no doubt in my mind, but between the lawyers and psychiatrists they'll make it out to be something else. That's the problem with our "justice" system, the people we should be able to depend on are just as bonkers/evil as the miscreants.
And I'd hate to be the lawyer trying to defend the indefensible.
Personally I couldn't do it. Not knowingly anyway. If I knew for a fact the person was guilty I wouldn't be able to defend them. If they are guilty and it is known, counsel them to plead guilty. Saying "not guilty" otherwise is a lie and a waste of time and money.
I looked at the video. I didn't see danny whimper.Take a gander at this and keep a dry eye.
Fallen Moncton RCMP officer’s police dog, Danny, breaks the hearts of Canadians as he whimpers at funeral | National Post