Friendly fire kills 5 American troops in Afghanistan

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Five American troops were killed in an apparent friendly fire tragedy in southern Afghanistan, the Pentagon said Tuesday.

The deaths occurred Monday when the unit came into contact with enemy forces, the coalition headquarters in Kabul said in a statement. The deaths are under investigation.

"Tragically, there is the possibility that fratricide may have been involved," the coalition statement said.

The incident comes as U.S. and allied forces are drawing down and turning the fight over to Afghan security forces.

Monday's deaths rank among of the most serious cases involving coalition-on-coalition friendly fire during the nearly 14-year Afghan war. One of the worst came in April 2002 when four Canadian soldiers were killed when an American F-16 dropped a bomb on them near a night firing exercise in the southern Kandahar.

Several news outlets, including the Associated Press and Afghanistan's Pajhwok Afghan News, reported that Monday's event took place in Arghandab district when troops called for air support during an operation in Gizee area. An Afghan National Army member and an interpreter also were killed, Pajhwok reported.

Taliban spokesman Qari Yusuf Ahmadi told Pajhwok that Taliban fighters were locked in a gun battle with foreign troops when coalition planes bombed their own troops.

The deaths bring to 36 the number of NATO soldiers killed so far this year in Afghanistan, with eight service members killed in June.


Friendly fire kills 5 NATO troops in Afghanistan
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
It's not "friendly fire", it is "stupid fire". When one soldier is hit with fire from his own side, it is an accident. Five killed is a failure of the leadership. I hate the term "friendly fire".
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,268
2,898
113
Toronto, ON
It's not "friendly fire", it is "stupid fire". When one soldier is hit with fire from his own side, it is an accident. Five killed is a failure of the leadership. I hate the term "friendly fire".

You are assuming it was a bullet. In this case it was air support which got more with one shot.

Who sent those soldiers to Afghanistan to fight for nothing? Could it be Obama?

Bush was pres when Americans were sent to Afganistan.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
You are assuming it was a bullet. In this case it was air support which got more with one shot.


.

Early in the Afghan conflict four Canadians were killed and eight wounded by an American fighter/bomber pilot who should have known better....who was repeatedly told there were Canadians in the area but bombed anyway.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Early in the Afghan conflict four Canadians were killed and eight wounded by an American fighter/bomber pilot who should have known better....who was repeatedly told there were Canadians in the area but bombed anyway.

Really? As simple as that?

Good grief.

Earlier in the war a Canadian soldier shot and killed another Canadian soldier after knowing he was a Canadian soldier and right in front of him. But that's ok because it was Canadian on Canadian and not as news worthy.
 
Last edited:

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
Really? As simple as that?

Good grief.

Nothing is simple in war, Eagle.......as well you know but when all is said and done, they are still dead and it wasn't the bad guys that killed them.

Earlier in the war a Canadian soldier shot and killed another Canadian soldier after knowing he was a Canadian soldier and right in front of him. But that's ok because it was Canadian on Canadian and not as news worthy.
Yes, we also were informed of this death.

War is senseless but the deaths of soldiers be they American or Canadian, British or whatever at the hands of "friendlies", seem just that much more so. Very sad to hear about these latest deaths.