That will probably go right over his head.......One word: Eisenhower
So not only was D-Day a mainly British-planned and organised operation, but almost all the equipment used during it was British too.
Try to keep up, Walter. I'm just feeding Blackie's fantasy that World War II was an English-only, no-Yank-or-Canuck-or-Russkie-participation, triumph of His Maj and the Great English Peepul.
Cuz I'm a nice guy, and I don't see no harm in Blackie's silly delusion.
The Soviets won the war in Europe.
It's the other way around. Most Yanks think D-Day - an operation in which the British took the lion's share and received the lion's share of the credit - was a Yank-only operation and the British and Canadian were notable for their absence.
Thank God for historians like Mr Hastings, who tell it as it was. No American, Saving-Private-Ryan-style romantic claptrap from him. Just plain, bare, raw history.
Nope... YOU are the one saying it was all Brits which is why you're taking the heat retard.
Considering it was the British who planned and organised the whole operation, a Briton who ran it, and it was mainly British ships and equipment used, it doesn't take a Stephen Hawking to work it it was the Yanks and Canucks who were the subordinate, junior partners in the whole affair.The brits were subordinate.
It was the British who insisted on delaying the opening of a Second Front through the invasion of France until 1944 because of the terrible experience at Dieppe.
That's because the British, as you seem to forget, had been busy fighting the Germans since 1939, unlike the Americans, and had already used up a lot of men and resources by the time of the Pacific Theatre, unlike the Americans latecomers who were fresh as daisies. It would be wise to do some research before writing such comments.In fact, after the fall of Singapore there was very little British involvement in the Pacific Theater until 1945.
Eisenhower was the Supreme Allied Commander... the limeys were subordinate.
In a British planned and led organisation using British ships and equipment.The US and Canada finished the war the brits started.
Monty - not Eisenhower - was in command of all Allied ground forces during Operation Overlord from the initial landings until after the Battle of Normandy. He then continued in command of the 21st Army Group for the rest of the campaign in North West Europe.
In a British planned and led organisation using British ships and equipment.
And it was the Germans who started WWII, just as they had started WWI.
Did you learn history at school at all, by any chance, or was your your teacher just useless?
The Brits were support troops on the Western Front and absolutely non-existent in the Pacific Theater until the Japanese were already beaten.
Without the Commonwealth nations, the US, and the USSR... the Brits lose the war. They could not even win the Battle of Britain without the Commonwealth and US help.
Sad
Monty was subordinate to Eisenhower. FACT
Don't be stupid... the brits were subordinate to the Americans.
Why? Because the Germans invaded Poland? Who else invaded Poland around that time BL?
Today’s commemoration of the 70th anniversary of D-Day is one of the last at which a diminishing band of the men who took part will be present.
Read more: On D-Day's anniversary, raise a glass to Britons who turned potential disaster into victory | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
D-Day was the Brits' greatest day because of all the brave Canadian boys who came to you blokes rescue!
I'm used to getting this total self absorbed, chauvanistic self-adulation from American treatments, salivating all over themselves.. .
Where?
Rubbish.
It is more likely that Churchill liked the idea that Hitler and Stalin were administering a major bloodletting to each other on the Eastern Front, and that he believed that London and Washington would benefit from a stalemated war in the East.
Since he already had nearly three years of war experience, Churchill had much influence on the Johnny-come-lately Yanks, newcomers to the war in Europe. It is therefore understandable that the opinion of the British leader ultimately prevailed, and that plans for opening a second front in 1942 were quietly discarded.
That's because the British, as you seem to forget, had been busy fighting the Germans since 1939, unlike the Americans, and had already used up a lot of men and resources by the time of the Pacific Theatre, unlike the Americans latecomers who were fresh as daisies.
It would be wise to do some research before writing such comments.
Monty couldn't fit his ego on the boat.Monty - not Eisenhower - was in command of all Allied ground forces during Operation Overlord from the initial landings until after the Battle of Normandy. He then continued in command of the 21st Army Group for the rest of the campaign in North West Europe.