There is no such thing as "climate science"
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
I've heard but in this case I am dead on target.
What does that have to do with the quote/link I quoted of yours.
Don't you see why I am dead on target as I pointed out above?
This quote/link below... Do you see? Do you See? See it? Can you see what I am talking about?
Second chance... the quoted link of yours directly above. Do you see? See it? Do you see it?
So, here are the actual studies that they cite.
Expert credibility in climate change
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf
http://cmbc.ucsd.edu/Research/Climate_Change/Oreskes 2004 Climate change.pdf
Where do you find any mention of psychologists?
Lol, I guess I have to speak in words that you understand.
Do you have brain damage? Do you not see who referenced that article first?
Or are you only worried about the fact that their page isn't set up to link properly?
Where don't they and please tell the psychological influences on the mechanics of climate?
Do hurricanes need cognitive behaviour training to overcome their anger issues?
Do hurricanes need cognitive behaviour training to overcome their anger issues?
umm...
You want me to prove a negative and until then you are just going to plow on with your baseless crap.
And they are the one's butchering science?
Eaglesmack, do you approve his message?
Say it with me:
in ter dis ci pli nar y
You keep the narrow focus if you like. It suits your style.
Once again your complete inability to follow a thread and to stay focused is astounding. Astounding I say!
Say it with me: "NOTHING. Psychology has nothing to do with climate mechanics therefore a psychologist is not a climate scientist studying the mechanics of climate."
So what? We've already established that answering some questions related to climate requires an interdisciplinary approach.
And here it is from the National Academies of Science:
Fostering Advances in Interdisciplinary Climate Science
Seriously, are you drinking?
This thread is one big hoopla over what climate science is, and so when someone points out that there are many interdisciplinary aspects besides your new found love of the phrase 'climate mechanics' you think that's all there is to AGW?
I'm sure Tecumsehsbones is right. Enjoy your parallel reality Derpy. I leave the floor to you.
This will go a long way in answering your questions... I don't have the interest in schooling someone that refuses to see reality
.. Which brings us back to the original question: What (by definition) is a 'climate scientist' and do academic institiutions offer dedicated studies and degrees in Climate Science?
This is not exactly a strong argument. If you can't explain this in even the most basic way, you might not be on the right side of this one.
What exactly do you think would be a better way to ensure that research is accurate and credible?
All you post is rhetoric and platitudes... Moreover, you have zero interest or ambition in actually uncovering any info on your own accord.
It's pointless for myself or any other to provide any info to you as it is wasted.
As the expression goes; you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink
How about full disclosure, proof (is always nice) and the ability for anyone to challenge rather than the 'approved list' of peer-reviewers that are chosen by the lobby that has been already ID'd as fraudulent