Temporary Foreign Workers put 270 Canadians out of work

Should TFWs be allowed to replace skilled Canadians just to save labour costs?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 12.5%
  • No

    Votes: 19 79.2%
  • Don't know

    Votes: 2 8.3%
  • Don't care

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    24

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I used to be an appliance repair person, I was expensive sometimes and free sometimes, I let the customer decide. No phone consultations and you must provide a light lunch I,ll be there some afternoon this week. You will be billed for missed appointments. Your dog must be tied and muzzled.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,342
113
Vancouver Island





THE CASE FOR A CONSTRUCTION MOBILITY TAX CREDIT

Canada’s Building Trades Unions have been urging the federal government to introduce a Construction Mobility Tax Credit for decades. Now industry is joining us in calling for change.

  • The Canadian Construction Association represents more than 17,000 construction companies across Canada.
  • Construction Labour Relations–Alberta (CLR-A) represent construction companies throughout Alberta.
What is the Construction Mobility Tax Credit?

The Construction Mobility Tax Credit would give skilled construction workers a personal tax exemption for expenses they incur to temporarily relocate for work. The exemption would allow workers to deduct any work-related travel expenses not reimbursed by their employers.

Why is mobility important?

Construction is Canada’s largest private-sector industry. Its direct impact on the economy is immense:

  • Construction accounts for 12 percent of Canada’s GDP.
  • The industry has more than 260,000 businesses.
  • It employs more than a million Canadians.
  • It is responsible for installing, repairing and renovating more than $150 billion worth of infrastructure every year.
Canada’s construction industry faces two major human-resources challenges: labour shortages and barriers to labour mobility.

The labour shortage challenge

Between 2013 and 2021 the construction industry needs to recruit 252,000 new construction workers to meet expansion and replacement demand. The industry is expected to attract 152,000 entrants through sustained programs aimed at traditional and non-traditional groups including women, Aboriginal people and immigrants. It will still need an additional 100,000 workers to avoid labour shortages.

Even if the construction industry succeeds in recruiting sufficient workers, mobility will continue to be an issue

The labour mobility challenge

Access to a highly skilled construction workforce is particularly important to the resource industry. The industry is pivotal to the Canadian economy and many large resource projects are located in remote, sparsely populated areas of the country.

Over the coming decade demand for skilled construction workers is expected to be strongest in the resource sector, with peak demand shifting from one region to another as large projects start up and wind down.

  • Resource projects in Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Shipbuilding in Nova Scotia and British Columbia
  • Mining projects in Northern Ontario’s Ring of Fire area
  • Utility construction in the Greater Toronto Area
  • Mining projects in Northern and rural Saskatchewan
  • Oil Sands and infrastructure projects across Northern Alberta
  • Mining and utility projects in Northern British Columbia
These projects will recruit and train new workers, both locally and from across the country. They will, however, still rely heavily on experienced, skilled workers who are willing to temporarily relocate.

Why institute a Construction Mobility Tax Credit?

The construction industry can partially solve skills shortages by encouraging more workers to temporarily relocate.

Construction workers are used to leaving their homes and families to work at distant sites for periods of time. A 2007 Construction Sector Council study found that 70 percent of surveyed tradespeople travelled to find work at least once in their careers. It also found that the cost of temporary relocation is the one of the biggest impediments to working mobile.

Figures compiled on behalf of Canada’s Building Trades Unions show that the average mobile worker spends approximately $3,500 of his or her own money to temporarily relocate. Employers rarely reimburse workers for these costs.

A Construction Mobility Tax Credit would remove one of the largest barriers to labour mobility and pave the road for workers to move more freely between regions of the country where their skills are in most demand.

Legislative background

The federal government has had two opportunities to consider a construction mobility tax credit. The Member for Hamilton-Mountain, introduced the credit in a Private Member’s Bill C-227 in 2006, and reintroduced it as Bill C-201 in 2013.

The bill would give skilled construction tradespeople a personal tax exemption on travel and accommodation expenses incurred for working at job sites more than 80 kilometres away from their homes. The credit would only apply to costs paid for by workers and not reimbursed by employers.

The Standing Committee on Human Resources, Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities supports the concept. In 2008, the committee recommended that the Income Tax Act be modified to provide for a tax credit for workers who must leave their principal residence to work on a temporary basis, provided that they maintain their primary residence.

Who would benefit?

Workers would benefit from reduced relocation costs and increased employment opportunities.

Employers would benefit from access to larger pools of qualified workers, and reduced costs relating to participation in programs such as the Temporary Foreign Worker program.

The Government of Canada would benefit from increased long-term income tax revenues and reduced dependence on costly social programs. The tax credit could yield a return on investment of nearly 5:1 for the Government of Canada.

What should government do?

We propose that the Government of Canada adopt a construction mobility tax credit, similar to the one proposed in Private Member’s Bill C-201, on a trial basis through 2015. (The Member for Hamilton-Mountain has agreed to withdraw her bill if the government agrees to create similar legislation of its own or if included in Federal Budget 2014.)

We expect that a three- or four-year pilot project to test this initiative will demonstrate conclusively that a Construction Mobility Tax Credit is sound public policy that will yield significant benefits for workers, employers and government alike.



BCTD Canada - Putting Canadians First
At one time you could claim any travel on public carriers as an expense against income. For some reason you could never claim for driving yourself.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Bet you never told a customer up front you were going to charge them $85 for two minutes to turn a screw. LOL

Even if that's all you do to fix the problem.
85$ is the price to show up (overhead)
And your knowledge.

Why are old people so cheap?
Plumbers have families to feed too.
Cheap people like you make me sick.

If you can't afford to fix your house, just
Do everyone a favour and sell it.

**** I hate cheap ****s like you.
 
Last edited:

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Yet Another Group of Canadian Tradesworkers Displaced by Low-Cost TFWs on Oil Sands Construction Site









The time has come for Canadian construction workers to express their outrage at the Harper Government's temporary foreign worker program (TFWP), which is being increasingly used by employers to displace Canadians and replace them with vulnerable and exploitable foreign workers, says Alberta Federation of Labour president Gil McGowan.

"The construction industry in Northern Alberta generates some of the best jobs in Canada," McGowan said. "But increasingly - instead of being filled by Canadians - those jobs are being given to temporary foreign workers earning as little as half the prevailing wage.


Stephen Harper says he won't tolerate abuse of the TFW program but the reality is that employers are simply using the program the way it was designed to be used and that is to undercut Canadians. When it comes to the TFWP, Stephen Harper is the walking, talking definition of hypocrisy."


McGowan's comments came in response to news that 65 Canadian ironworkers, working for a Quebec-based company called Pacer Construction on Imperial Oil's Kearle Lake oil sands project, were laid off on Tuesday, Feb. 4, and replaced by TFWs from Croatia who are being paid only $18 / hour - less than half the prevailing wage earned by Canadians doing the same work.


McGowan will be available for comment in Calgary at 2:15 p.m. at the Air Canada departure level. Reporters interested in talking with the ironworkers who were displaced can contact Ironworkers Local 720 Business Manager Harry Tostowaryk at 780-482-0720.


Read more: Yet Another Group of Canadian Tradesworkers Displaced by Low-Cost TFWs on Oil Sands Construction Site - Press Release - Digital Journal
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Even if that's all you do to fix the problem.
85$ is the price to show up (overhead)
And your knowledge.

Why are old people so cheap?
Plumbers have families to feed too.
Cheap people like you make me sick.

If you can't afford to fix your house, just
Do everyone a favour and sell it.

**** I hate cheap ****s like you.

F**K you, A$$hole!
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
120,205
14,854
113
Low Earth Orbit
I wonder if lazy as$ eastern Canadians who bitch and whine but won't move to take work has anything to do with it?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Too many assumptions going on here.

But I suppose the idea that anyone not moving to Alberta is on welfare is a completely valid point if you want to ignore reality.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Too many assumptions going on here.

But I suppose the idea that anyone not moving to Alberta is on welfare is a completely valid point if you want to ignore reality.

Suncor is flying people in from Nfld (at no cost to the individual) on a rotational basis every week.

There are no excuses MF, other than the sad and pathetic ones that you are providing