Jesus H Christ™

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

Possibly. But if you're going to assume that whatever the Crown says is the truth, why bother having trials and such?

She'll get her day in court.

 

[petros]

Avenue R.....right in the thick of the alphabet soup. It makes my neighbourhood in Regina look like Beverley Hills.

Possibly. But if you're going to assume that whatever the Crown says is the truth, why bother having trials and such?

What does the Crown have to gain by lying and pressing a false charge? 1st degree charges aren't handed out like lollipops in Canada.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

She'll get her day in court.

How is that responsive to the question?

 

[petros]

See above.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Avenue R.....right in the thick of the alphabet soup. It makes my neighbourhood in Regina look like Beverley Hills.



What does the Crown have to gain by lying and pressing a false charge? 1st degree charges aren't handed out like lollipops in Canada.

Oh, OK. Lock her up, then. A trial would be a waste of time and money. The government would never lie or be mistaken.

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

Oh, OK. Lock her up, then. A trial would be a waste of time and money. The government would never lie or be mistaken.

Have you been drinking whatever it is that Bornruff drinks?

 

[petros]

Boat gas?

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Have you been drinking whatever it is that Bornruff drinks?

Not that I know of. How bout you? What's your tipple du jour?

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

Not that I know of. How bout you? What's your tipple du jour?

This morning its coffee. I only ask because I don't see anyone any calling to avoid a trial and go directly to lynching.

 

[DaSleeper]

Oh, OK. Lock her up, then. A trial would be a waste of time and money. The government would never lie or be mistaken.

I never saw such outrage pre Zimmerman trial.......

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

I never saw such outrage pre Zimmerman trial.......

Precisely. Zimmerman was clearly guilty, or he would never have been charged.

 

[Blackleaf]

A 35 year old woman in Saskatoon has been charged with first degree murder of a 5 year boy.

Why?

I'm baffled.

Probably because she may have murdered him.

 

[MHz]

This morning its coffee. I only ask because I don't see anyone any calling to avoid a trial and go directly to lynching.

Course not that would be a violation of their rights, lynching in the morning and then the trial in the afternoon. Letter of the Law and all of that.

 

[taxslave]

Hopefully she pleads guilty if for no other reason than to piss off all the lawyers hoping for a retirement project.

 

[petros]

I never saw such outrage pre Zimmerman trial.......

Still cheering on the wife beating killer that scammed supporters out of $410,000?

 

[JLM]

That would be funny if it wasn't in a thread about the murder of a 5 year old.

I didn’t assign the title to the thread.

 

[DaSleeper]

Precisely. Zimmerman was clearly guilty, or he would never have been charged.

And found "Not Guilty"............

 

[Blackleaf]

Or, rather, what the Crown claims is a murder of a 5 year old.

Or, rather, the jury.

If this woman had killed a child in Britain, she would have been sentenced to die in prison.

In Canada she'll probably be out in five years.

 

[DaSleeper]

Still cheering on the wife beating killer that scammed supporters out of $410,000?

When was he found guilty of that in court? Or is it just in selective newspapers?

 

[JLM]

Or, rather, the jury.

If this woman had killed a child in Britain, she would have been sentenced to die in prison.

In Canada she'll probably be out in five years.

Yeah, but under fairly strict conditions!