I dont care about why but I do care the real feeling of the HongKong people. They love British far more than China.
Is it justice to admit savages independent?
- Thread starter chineseroman
- Start date
Uncivilized african have no ability to creat modern GOVT. Civilized western have the responsibility to lead the uncivilized people and territories.
it means that colonization of an area may impose a different culture on that area. some people argue that is always wrong since it was imposed on the people, however, some good happens too... it is not black and white
sometimes people are better off, other times not
Hong Kong was better off in my opinion... Tibet is an example of a country that has not done well under the rule of China
Interesting links thanks Goob. I have always found Chinese history to be interesting with the various dynasties and multi-revolutions...etc. A fascinating people also.
The people may not agree with you here Goober.
Depends on which side of the colonization you are on. North American Indians did not fare too well under the oppressive rule of Britain.
Opium was exported from India to China by Jewish bankers. You obviously don't respect reality because you use Wickedpedia.
The North American's land does not belong to the indians. We cant say the glassland belong to the sheep. Because of the babyish society of indian had not developed the system of land wealth. Nobody owe the land before the western people came in.
In fact, the empire dont care about the abuse of Opium or the negtive influence to the society. Just opium trade surplus of British make the silver came out of China, lowering his empire tax. He is angry about this.Opium was exported from India to China by Jewish bankers. You obviously don't respect reality because you use Wickedpedia.
I would say whether colonization was good or bad is truly something which can be argued on either side. It is not always good, it is not always bad. If you read Chinese history before Communism, China has a long and rich history.
The North American land did belong to the Indians in that they were here first. Grassland and sheep is not a good comparison. North American Indians had their own rich culture before they were invaded. It is true they did not own the land they lived upon the land. And in truth no one really owns land. We are only here upon the earth for a short time. The land is a living thing with a nature of it's own.
The BBC http://www.56.com/u20/v_NTg4ODUyMDk.html/1030_sonicluo3.html It says the Arabic numerals came from greek. Indeed, all the science came from Greek. What the other parts of the earth did is justing learning and copying, never creating.
wouldn't know about the BBC, the link you supplied is all gobledgook, not english. Just letting you know you got another one wrong.
