Fed up with Islam Yet???

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
And the Ramadan body count so far...

836 Dead.


 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,309
4,019
113
Edmonton
I guess there are those who simply don't get what Colpy is saying (on purpose & to create conflict). I believe rational people understand that most terrorists today are Islamists but not all Muslims are Islamists or terrorists. That's a fact. I think they deliberately misconstrue what is being said to denigrate the person who says it and make themselves feel suprerior. By bringing in "Christian" activities is merely a distraction of the real issues we face. There are "loony toons" in every religion, which is also a fact that can't be disputed. However, we're talking about Islam here. Want to talk about Christian terrorists?? Start another Thread!!

JMHO
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,265
9,473
113
Washington DC
I guess there are those who simply don't get what Colpy is saying (on purpose & to create conflict). I believe rational people understand that most terrorists today are Islamists but not all Muslims are Islamists or terrorists. That's a fact. I think they deliberately misconstrue what is being said to denigrate the person who says it and make themselves feel suprerior. By bringing in "Christian" activities is merely a distraction of the real issues we face. There are "loony toons" in every religion, which is also a fact that can't be disputed. However, we're talking about Islam here. Want to talk about Christian terrorists?? Start another Thread!!

JMHO
Yes, but Colpy has not (nor has anyone else) suggested a blanket ban on immigration on any group other than Muslims. Those of us who answer with accounts of illegality and brutality by Christians are merely pointing out that, if one is going to ban immigration by all members of a religion on the basis of the conduct of a few members of that religion, then to be consistent one must ban Christians as well as Muslims.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Yes, but Colpy has not (nor has anyone else) suggested a blanket ban on immigration on any group other than Muslims. Those of us who answer with accounts of illegality and brutality by Christians are merely pointing out that, if one is going to ban immigration by all members of a religion on the basis of the conduct of a few members of that religion, then to be consistent one must ban Christians as well as Muslims.

How about just ban people whose names sound terroristy... Maybe any name that requires you to hawk a loogie as part of the pronunciation?
 
Last edited:

55Mercury

rigid member
May 31, 2007
4,388
1,065
113
Doesn't sound terroristy enough, besides, I can say those names without needing to clear my throat as part of the process.

BTW - I went back and added some context to my earlier reply.
to be fair, it is generally acceptable to hork a loogie after pronouncing them.

just sayin'

:?P
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
How about everyone packing up and moving to whatever country their ancestors came from? Every country should become seclusionist? Course that may prove to be a problem with wifey and folks like her (her Dad is from northern Manitoba and Mum is from Ireland). Multiple citizenship? :D

Anyway, restrict immigration to one ethnicity and it'd be fair to restrict immigration to ALL...... and on the basis of names that sound "terroristy"? Ludicrous.
 

Omicron

Privy Council
Jul 28, 2010
1,694
3
38
Vancouver
When was the last time a Baptist stoned a group of boys to death...

Well... there was the case of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard

It's when dumbies take the Laws of God into their own hands. It's like they think they're going to get a medal at the Pearly Gates for being a Brownshirt-for-God, in spite of how it specifically states "Judgement is Mine" (sayeth the Lord).

Lucky for Christians they have an ecumenical heirarchy to reign the mobs in so they don't do things like burn hundreds of thousands of women at the stake for being witches. Christians don't force conversion by the sword... much more efficient to use Inquisition torture.

That being said, and yes, I know it's a bit off topic, but there *is* something that kind'a bugs me about Muslims and their fixation on the Hijab.

If you read the Koran, what it says is that it's okay for Muslim women to dress in a humble fashion according to the standards of the day so they can go to market without being picked on. In otherwords, the Prophet said it was okay for women, if not the guys, to be discrete about their faith.

So what happens? It gets turned around so that Muslim women have to wear an anachronistic form of headgear that blatantly identifies them as Muslim, while the guys get to waltz around in modern suit-and-ties.

Christians would never do anything like that. They wouldn't have female orders where the rule was nuns dress in the conservative fashion of the day, only to get it locked down such that you can see a nun coming from a mile away.

Something to keep in mind about North American Muslims... don't forget that lots of North American Christians moved here to get away from religous tyranny.

... Obama wanted no terror attacks on his watch.

F#@K acknowledgement and benefits for dead and wounded military personnel.

Frankly dude, I didn't believe you when I first read it, but then I found this: Veterans Face Red Tape Accessing Disability, Other Benefits : NPR


All it's saying is that Muslims haven't figured out how to do violence on a massively well-organized scale.
 
Last edited: